These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37422937)

  • 1. Monocular information for perceiving large egocentric distance: A comparison between monocularly blind patients and normally sighted observers.
    Gao L; Huang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Liu Z; Pan JS; Yu M
    Vision Res; 2023 Oct; 211():108279. PubMed ID: 37422937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Targeted reaching with monocular depth information and haptic feedback: Comparing between monocular patients and normally sighted observers.
    Gao L; Liu Z; Chen Z; Pan JS; Yu M
    Vision Res; 2023 Oct; 211():108274. PubMed ID: 37343461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monocular Perception of Equidistance: The Effects of Viewing Experience and Motion-generated Information.
    Chen S; Li Y; Pan JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2022 May; 99(5):470-478. PubMed ID: 35149634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Space perception of strabismic observers in the real world environment.
    Ooi TL; He ZJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Feb; 56(3):1761-8. PubMed ID: 25698702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual distance perception indoors, outdoors, and in the dark.
    Dukes JM; Norman JF; Shartzer CD
    Vision Res; 2022 May; 194():107992. PubMed ID: 35030510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets.
    Rieser JJ; Ashmead DH; Talor CR; Youngquist GA
    Perception; 1990; 19(5):675-89. PubMed ID: 2103000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: implications for real and virtual indoor environments.
    Creem-Regehr SH; Willemsen P; Gooch AA; Thompson WB
    Perception; 2005; 34(2):191-204. PubMed ID: 15832569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distance estimation in the visual and visuomotor systems.
    Servos P
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 130(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 10638439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.
    Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distance impairs postural stability only under binocular viewing.
    Lê TT; Kapoula Z
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3586-93. PubMed ID: 16899270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of visual and nonvisual sensory inputs to walked distance in a blind-walking task.
    Ellard CG; Shaughnessy SC
    Perception; 2003; 32(5):567-78. PubMed ID: 12854643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Role of Binocular Vision in Driving Pseudoneglect in Visual and Haptic Bisection: Evidence From Strabismic and Monocular Blind Individuals.
    Ciricugno A; Rinaldi L; Vecchi T; Merabet LB; Cattaneo Z
    Multisens Res; 2020 Mar; 33(4-5):549-567. PubMed ID: 31059488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monocular vision and increased distance reducing the effects of visual manipulation on body sway.
    Moraes R; Lopes AG; Barela JA
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Sep; 460(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 19501130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of somatosensory input in target localization during binocular and monocular viewing while performing a high precision reaching and placement task.
    Tugac N; Gonzalez D; Noguchi K; Niechwiej-Szwedo E
    Exp Eye Res; 2019 Jun; 183():76-83. PubMed ID: 30125540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peripheral fading with monocular and binocular viewing.
    González EG; Weinstock M; Steinbach MJ
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 17081583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monocular vernier acuity in normally binocular, monocular, and amblyopic subjects.
    Osuobeni EP
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Jul; 69(7):550-5. PubMed ID: 1635759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.
    Grant S
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 233(12):3489-505. PubMed ID: 26298046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binocular depth discrimination and estimation beyond interaction space.
    Allison RS; Gillam BJ; Vecellio E
    J Vis; 2009 Jan; 9(1):10.1-14. PubMed ID: 19271880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereograms using absolute distance information.
    Kuroki D; Nakamizo S
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4206-16. PubMed ID: 17045325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.