BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37423916)

  • 1. Reconsidering pregnancy screening policies for minors: patient-specific estimate of fetus and effective dose for potentially pregnant minors undergoing optimized dose CT of the pelvis.
    Nosrati R; Callahan MJ; Tsai A; Voss SD; Zhang D
    Pediatr Radiol; 2023 Sep; 53(10):2054-2059. PubMed ID: 37423916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating fetal dose from tube current-modulated (TCM) and fixed tube current (FTC) abdominal/pelvis CT examinations.
    Hardy AJ; Angel E; Bostani M; Cagnon C; McNitt-Gray M
    Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 46(6):2729-2743. PubMed ID: 30893477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
    Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation dose reduction in thoracic and abdomen-pelvic CT using tube current modulation: a phantom study.
    Sabarudin A; Mustafa Z; Nassir KM; Hamid HA; Sun Z
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5135. PubMed ID: 25679153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of CT dose to the fetus and pregnant female patient using patient-specific computational models.
    Xie T; Poletti PA; Platon A; Becker CD; Zaidi H
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Mar; 28(3):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 28887589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of radiation doses and lifetime attributable risk of radiation-induced cancer in the uterus and prostate from abdomen pelvis CT examinations.
    Shubayr N; Alashban Y
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1094328. PubMed ID: 36699908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NCICT: a computational solution to estimate organ doses for pediatric and adult patients undergoing CT scans.
    Lee C; Kim KP; Bolch WE; Moroz BE; Folio L
    J Radiol Prot; 2015 Dec; 35(4):891-909. PubMed ID: 26609995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrospective analysis of dose delivered to the uterus during CT examination in pregnant women.
    Dabli D; Linard M; Durand Q; Frandon J; de Oliveira F; Beregi JP; Greffier J
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2022; 103(7-8):331-337. PubMed ID: 35346620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hip Imaging in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Estimation and Intrapatient Comparison of Patient-Specific Radiation Doses of Low-Dose CT and Radiography.
    Nosrati R; Zhang D; Callahan MJ; Shore BJ; Tsai A
    Invest Radiol; 2023 Mar; 58(3):190-198. PubMed ID: 36070536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic CT simulation optimization for radiation therapy: A general strategy.
    Li H; Yu L; Anastasio MA; Chen HC; Tan J; Gay H; Michalski JM; Low DA; Mutic S
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031913. PubMed ID: 24593731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of fetal radiation exposure in pregnant women undergoing computed tomography and rotational angiography examinations for pelvic trauma.
    Matsunaga Y; Haba T; Kobayashi M; Suzuki S; Asada Y; Chida K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Apr; 200(6):580-587. PubMed ID: 38486458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography.
    Nawfel RD; Judy PF; Schleipman AR; Silverman SG
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 15220498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation analysis of organ doses determined by Monte Carlo simulation with dose metrics for patients undergoing chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations.
    Fujii K; Nomura K; Muramatsu Y; Goto T; Obara S; Ota H; Tsukagoshi S
    Phys Med; 2020 Sep; 77():1-9. PubMed ID: 32755745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control.
    Israel GM; Cicchiello L; Brink J; Huda W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1342-6. PubMed ID: 21098193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating lung, breast, and effective dose from low-dose lung cancer screening CT exams with tube current modulation across a range of patient sizes.
    Hardy AJ; Bostani M; McMillan K; Zankl M; McCollough C; Cagnon C; McNitt-Gray M
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4667-4682. PubMed ID: 30118143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of fetal radiation dose from computed tomography scanning in late pregnancy: depth-dose data from routine examinations.
    Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Voloudaki A; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Invest Radiol; 2000 Sep; 35(9):527-33. PubMed ID: 10981996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Organ and effective doses in pediatric patients undergoing helical multislice computed tomography examination.
    Lee C; Lee C; Staton RJ; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE
    Med Phys; 2007 May; 34(5):1858-73. PubMed ID: 17555267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Size-specific dose estimations for pediatric chest, abdomen/pelvis and head CT scans with the use of GATE.
    Kostou T; Papadimitroulas P; Papaconstadopoulos P; Devic S; Seuntjens J; Kagadis GC
    Phys Med; 2019 Sep; 65():181-190. PubMed ID: 31494372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Organ doses for reference pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Lee C; Kim KP; Long DJ; Bolch WE
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2129-46. PubMed ID: 22482634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Body Size-Specific Organ and Effective Doses of Chest CT Screening Examinations of the National Lung Screening Trial.
    Lee C; Flynn MJ; Judy PF; Cody DD; Bolch WE; Kruger RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1082-1088. PubMed ID: 28267354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.