43 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37423919)
1. TruEst: a better estimator of evolutionary distance under the INFER model.
Zabelkin A; Avdeyev P; Alexeev N
J Math Biol; 2023 Jul; 87(2):25. PubMed ID: 37423919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ancestral Genome Reconstruction on Whole Genome Level.
Feng B; Zhou L; Tang J
Curr Genomics; 2017 Aug; 18(4):306-315. PubMed ID: 29081686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconstructing the genomic architecture of mammalian ancestors using multispecies comparative maps.
Murphy WJ; Bourque G; Tesler G; Pevzner P; O'Brien SJ
Hum Genomics; 2003 Nov; 1(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 15601531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multichromosomal median and halving problems under different genomic distances.
Tannier E; Zheng C; Sankoff D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Apr; 10():120. PubMed ID: 19386099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction from high-resolution whole-genome data and a tree of 68 eukaryotes.
Lin Y; Hu F; Tang J; Moret BM
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2013; ():285-96. PubMed ID: 23424133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gene order alignment on trees with multiOrthoAlign.
Benzaid B; El-Mabrouk N
BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S5. PubMed ID: 25572278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phylogenetic reconstruction from transpositions.
Yue F; Zhang M; Tang J
BMC Genomics; 2008 Sep; 9 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S15. PubMed ID: 18831780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A zero-agnostic model for copy number evolution in cancer.
Schmidt H; Sashittal P; Raphael BJ
PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Nov; 19(11):e1011590. PubMed ID: 37943952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling the mosaic structure of bacterial genomes to infer their evolutionary history.
Sheinman M; Arndt PF; Massip F
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Mar; 121(13):e2313367121. PubMed ID: 38517978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Controlling for Phylogenetic Relatedness and Evolutionary Rates Improves the Discovery of Associations Between Species' Phenotypic and Genomic Differences.
Prudent X; Parra G; Schwede P; Roscito JG; Hiller M
Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Aug; 33(8):2135-50. PubMed ID: 27222536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breakpoint graphs and ancestral genome reconstructions.
Alekseyev MA; Pevzner PA
Genome Res; 2009 May; 19(5):943-57. PubMed ID: 19218533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A flexible ancestral genome reconstruction method based on gapped adjacencies.
Gagnon Y; Blanchette M; El-Mabrouk N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012; 13 Suppl 19(Suppl 19):S4. PubMed ID: 23281872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficient algorithms for reconstructing gene content by co-evolution.
Birin H; Tuller T
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Oct; 12 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S12. PubMed ID: 22151715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The era of the ARG: An introduction to ancestral recombination graphs and their significance in empirical evolutionary genomics.
Lewanski AL; Grundler MC; Bradburd GS
PLoS Genet; 2024 Jan; 20(1):e1011110. PubMed ID: 38236805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mapping ancestral genomes with massive gene loss: a matrix sandwich problem.
Gavranović H; Chauve C; Salse J; Tannier E
Bioinformatics; 2011 Jul; 27(13):i257-65. PubMed ID: 21685079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An alignment-free method to find and visualise rearrangements between pairs of DNA sequences.
Pratas D; Silva RM; Pinho AJ; Ferreira PJ
Sci Rep; 2015 May; 5():10203. PubMed ID: 25984837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A zero-agnostic model for copy number evolution in cancer.
Schmidt H; Sashittal P; Raphael BJ
bioRxiv; 2023 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 37090633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mottle: Accurate pairwise substitution distance at high divergence through the exploitation of short-read mappers and gradient descent.
Prusokiene A; Boonham N; Fox A; Howard TP
PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0298834. PubMed ID: 38512939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phylogenomic and comparative genomic analyses support a single evolutionary origin of flatfish asymmetry.
Duarte-Ribeiro E; Rosas-Puchuri U; Friedman M; Woodruff GC; Hughes LC; Carpenter KE; White WT; Pogonoski JJ; Westneat M; Diaz de Astarloa JM; Williams JT; Santos MD; Domínguez-Domínguez O; Ortí G; Arcila D; Betancur-R R
Nat Genet; 2024 Jun; 56(6):1069-1072. PubMed ID: 38802566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reply to: Phylogenomic and comparative genomic analyses support a single evolutionary origin of flatfish asymmetry.
Lü Z; Li H; Jiang H; Luo H; Wang W; Kong X; Li Y
Nat Genet; 2024 Jun; 56(6):1073-1074. PubMed ID: 38802565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
