These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37425167)

  • 1. Why don't politicians talk about meat? The political psychology of human-animal relations in elections.
    Saha S
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1021013. PubMed ID: 37425167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The abortion issue in the 1980 elections.
    Granberg D; Burlison J
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(5):231-8. PubMed ID: 6653742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who benefits from voter identification laws?
    Harden JJ; Campos A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Feb; 120(7):e2217323120. PubMed ID: 36745795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are We Rational or Not? The Exploration of Voter Choices during the 2016 Presidential and Legislative Elections in Taiwan.
    Lee IC; Chen EE; Yen NS; Tsai CH; Cheng HP
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1762. PubMed ID: 29075215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.
    Chiao JY; Bowman NE; Gill H
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3666. PubMed ID: 18974841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
    Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Studying topic engagement and synergy among candidates for 2020 US Elections.
    Baxi MK; Sharma R; Mago V
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):136. PubMed ID: 36118938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is support of abortion political suicide?
    Rosoff JI
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1975; 7(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 1112380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social Security: a financial appraisal for the median voter.
    Galasso V
    Soc Secur Bull; 2001-2002; 64(2):57-65. PubMed ID: 12428510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voter Preferences Reflect a Competition Between Policy and Identity.
    Jenke L; Huettel SA
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():566020. PubMed ID: 33178071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The political polarization of physicians in the United States: an analysis of campaign contributions to federal elections, 1991 through 2012.
    Bonica A; Rosenthal H; Rothman DJ
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Aug; 174(8):1308-17. PubMed ID: 24887456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Moral-Language Use by U.S. Political Elites.
    Wang SN; Inbar Y
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Jan; 32(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 33306432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Social media echo chambers and satisfaction with democracy among Democrats and Republicans in the aftermath of the 2016 US elections.
    Justwan F; Baumgaertner B; Carlisle JE; Clark AK; Clark M
    J Elect Public Opin Parties; 2018; 28(4):424-442. PubMed ID: 31231432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Race, Gender, and the U.S. Presidency: A Comparison of Implicit and Explicit Biases in the Electorate.
    Calvert GA; Evans G; Pathak A
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35049628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rethinking stereotype reliance. Understanding the connection between female candidates and gender stereotypes.
    Bauer NM
    Politics Life Sci; 2013; 32(1):22-42. PubMed ID: 24047089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Feb; 45(2):224-239. PubMed ID: 29985107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An ideological asymmetry in the diffusion of moralized content on social media among political leaders.
    Brady WJ; Wills JA; Burkart D; Jost JT; Van Bavel JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1802-1813. PubMed ID: 30589291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy.
    Van Boven L; Ehret PJ; Sherman DK
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 13(4):492-507. PubMed ID: 29961412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.