147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37426940)
1. Women satisfaction on choosing the cervical ripening method: Oral misoprostol versus balloon catheter.
Flament E; Blanc-Petitjean P; Koch A; Deruelle P; Le Ray C; Sananès N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2023 Sep; 19():100202. PubMed ID: 37426940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of primiparous women's childbirth experience in labor induction with cervical ripening by balloon catheter or oral misoprostol - a prospective study using a validated childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS).
Place K; Kruit H; Rahkonen L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Oct; 101(10):1153-1162. PubMed ID: 35933726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Women's acceptance of a double-balloon device as an additional method for inducing labour.
Kehl S; Welzel G; Ehard A; Berlit S; Spaich S; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 May; 168(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 23298898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outpatient Induction of Labor - Are Balloon Catheters an Appropriate Method?
Rath W; Stelzl P; Kehl S
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2021 Jan; 81(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 33487667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of mechanical and nonmechanical methods of cervix ripening in women with pre-labor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.
Mokhtarpour S; Sahhaf F; Vahedi L; Sani A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Apr; 5(4):100868. PubMed ID: 36690182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol vs transvaginal balloon catheter for labor induction: An observational study within the SWEdish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS).
Alkmark M; Carlsson Y; Wendel SB; Elden H; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Saltvedt S; Sengpiel V; Wessberg A; Wikström AK; Hagberg H; Wennerholm UB
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Aug; 100(8):1463-1477. PubMed ID: 33768520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
de Vaan MD; Ten Eikelder ML; Jozwiak M; Palmer KR; Davies-Tuck M; Bloemenkamp KW; Mol BWJ; Boulvain M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Oct; 10(10):CD001233. PubMed ID: 31623014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Double-balloon catheter and sequential oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term: a retrospective cohort study.
Kehl S; Weiss C; Dammer U; Heimrich J; Beckmann MW; Faschingbauer F; Sütterlin M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Sep; 204():78-82. PubMed ID: 27525685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pain and satisfaction in women induced by vaginal dinoprostone, double balloon catheter and oral misoprostol.
Druenne J; Semay T; Giraud A; Chauleur C; Raia-Barjat T
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Dec; 51(10):102484. PubMed ID: 36228867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial].
Oliveira MV; Oberst PV; Leite GK; Aguemi A; Kenj G; Leme VD; Sass N
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 32(7):346-51. PubMed ID: 21152844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Timing of sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol for induction of labor.
Kehl S; Böhm L; Weiss C; Heimrich J; Dammer U; Baier F; Sütterlin M; Beckmann MW; Faschingbauer F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1495-1501. PubMed ID: 27642010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
Kehl S; Ziegler J; Schleussner E; Tuschy B; Berlit S; Kirscht J; Hägele F; Weiss C; Siemer J; Sütterlin M
BJOG; 2015 Jan; 122(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 25327872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial.
Aduloju OP; Akintayo AA; Adanikin AI; Ade-Ojo IP
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Dec; 56(6):578-584. PubMed ID: 27385377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison between induction of labor with 3 methods of titrated oral misoprostol, constant dose of oral misoprostol and Foley catheter with extra amniotic saline infusion (EASI), in women with unfavorable cervix.
Kashanian M; Bahasadri S; Nejat Dehkordy A; Sheikhansari N; Eshraghi N
Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2019; 33():115. PubMed ID: 31934574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Misoprostol combined with cervical single or double balloon catheters versus misoprostol alone for labor induction of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Ornat L; Alonso-Ventura V; Bueno-Notivol J; Chedraui P; Pérez-López FR;
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Oct; 33(20):3453-3468. PubMed ID: 30741051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Afolabi BB; Oyeneyin OL; Ogedengbe OK
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Jun; 89(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 15919393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Moving preinduction cervical ripening to a lower acuity inpatient setting using the synthetic hygroscopic cervical dilator: a cost-consequence analysis for the United States.
Saunders SJ; Grisamore JL; Wong T; Torrejon Torres R; Saunders R; Einerson B
J Med Econ; 2022; 25(1):1185-1198. PubMed ID: 36274625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cervical ripening methods for induction of labour: A population-based study using coarsened exact matching.
Blanc-Petitjean P; Carbonne B; Deneux-Tharaux C; Salomé M; Goffinet F; Le Ray C;
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 33(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 31342567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
