These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37428020)

  • 1. Association and Prediction Utilizing Craniocaudal and Mediolateral Oblique View Digital Mammography and Long-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
    Chen S; Tamimi RM; Colditz GA; Jiang S
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2023 Sep; 16(9):531-537. PubMed ID: 37428020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deep learning modeling using normal mammograms for predicting breast cancer risk.
    Arefan D; Mohamed AA; Berg WA; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Wu S
    Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 31667873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of Short-Term Breast Cancer Risk with Fusion of CC- and MLO-Based Risk Models in Four-View Mammograms.
    Li Y; Yuan W; Fan M; Zheng B; Li L
    J Digit Imaging; 2022 Aug; 35(4):910-922. PubMed ID: 35262841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated mammographic breast density estimation using a fully convolutional network.
    Lee J; Nishikawa RM
    Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29363774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective.
    Mohamed AA; Luo Y; Peng H; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 28932980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk.
    Vachon CM; Brandt KR; Ghosh K; Scott CG; Maloney SD; Carston MJ; Pankratz VS; Sellers TA
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Jan; 16(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 17220330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast Cancer Conspicuity on Simultaneously Acquired Digital Mammographic Images versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
    Korhonen KE; Conant EF; Cohen EA; Synnestvedt M; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP
    Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31084481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal Analysis of Change in Mammographic Density in Each Breast and Its Association With Breast Cancer Risk.
    Jiang S; Bennett DL; Rosner BA; Colditz GA
    JAMA Oncol; 2023 Jun; 9(6):808-814. PubMed ID: 37103922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fusion of k-Gabor features from medio-lateral-oblique and craniocaudal view mammograms for improved breast cancer diagnosis.
    Sasikala S; Ezhilarasi M
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(5):1036-1041. PubMed ID: 30197344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
    Tan M; Pu J; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2416-28. PubMed ID: 25851469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examination of fully automated mammographic density measures using LIBRA and breast cancer risk in a cohort of 21,000 non-Hispanic white women.
    Habel LA; Alexeeff SE; Achacoso N; Arasu VA; Gastounioti A; Gerstley L; Klein RJ; Liang RY; Lipson JA; Mankowski W; Margolies LR; Rothstein JH; Rubin DL; Shen L; Sistig A; Song X; Villaseñor MA; Westley M; Whittemore AS; Yaffe MJ; Wang P; Kontos D; Sieh W
    Breast Cancer Res; 2023 Aug; 25(1):92. PubMed ID: 37544983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. National diagnostic reference levels for digital diagnostic and screening mammography in Uganda.
    Odongo D; Musisi A; Okello RO; Bongomin F; Erem G
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(8):e0294541. PubMed ID: 39208065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.
    Keller BM; Nathan DL; Wang Y; Zheng Y; Gee JC; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4903-17. PubMed ID: 22894417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of a fully automated, high-throughput mammographic density measurement tool for use with processed digital mammograms.
    Couwenberg AM; Verkooijen HM; Li J; Pijnappel RM; Charaghvandi KR; Hartman M; van Gils CH
    Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):1037-43. PubMed ID: 24962023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting breast cancer risk using mammographic density measurements from both mammogram sides and views.
    Stone J; Ding J; Warren RM; Duffy SW
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Nov; 124(2):551-4. PubMed ID: 20544272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Area and volumetric density estimation in processed full-field digital mammograms for risk assessment of breast cancer.
    Cheddad A; Czene K; Eriksson M; Li J; Easton D; Hall P; Humphreys K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110690. PubMed ID: 25329322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.
    Østerås BH; Skaane P; Gullien R; Martinsen ACT
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(3):035006. PubMed ID: 29311416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening Sensitivity According to Breast Cancer Location.
    Théberge I; Guertin MH; Vandal N; Côté G; Dufresne MP; Pelletier É; Brisson J
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2019 May; 70(2):186-192. PubMed ID: 30853307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deep Understanding of Breast Density Classification.
    Cogan T; Tamil L
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():1140-1143. PubMed ID: 33018188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.