139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37429216)
1. Serial attention to serial memory: The psychological refractory period in forward and backward cued recall.
Logan GD; Lilburn SD; Ulrich JE
Cogn Psychol; 2023 Sep; 145():101583. PubMed ID: 37429216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The episodic flanker effect: Memory retrieval as attention turned inward.
Logan GD; Cox GE; Annis J; Lindsey DRB
Psychol Rev; 2021 Apr; 128(3):397-445. PubMed ID: 33939456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attentional limits in memory retrieval.
Carrier LM; Pashler H
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1339-48. PubMed ID: 8744967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. No position-specific interference from prior lists in cued recognition: A challenge for position coding (and other) theories of serial memory.
Logan GD; Cox GE; Lilburn SD; Ulrich JE
Cogn Psychol; 2024 Mar; 149():101641. PubMed ID: 38377823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval.
Rohrer D; Pashler HE
Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 12747495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The spotlight turned inward: the time-course of focusing attention on memory.
Logan GD; Lilburn SD; Ulrich JE
Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Jun; 30(3):1028-1040. PubMed ID: 36471229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Memory asymmetry of forward and backward associations in recognition tasks.
Yang J; Zhao P; Zhu Z; Mecklinger A; Fang Z; Li H
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):253-69. PubMed ID: 22924326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two retrievals from a single cue: A bottleneck persists across episodic and semantic memory.
Orscheschek F; Strobach T; Schubert T; Rickard T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1005-1028. PubMed ID: 29703125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Associative retrieval processes in free recall.
Kahana MJ
Mem Cognit; 1996 Jan; 24(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 8822162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The emergence of all-or-none retrieval of chunks in verbal serial recall.
Shafaghat Ardebili A; Liu YS; Caplan JB
Mem Cognit; 2024 Feb; 52(2):352-372. PubMed ID: 37801193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of rehearsal and reminding in the recall of categorized word lists.
Ward G; Tan L
Cogn Psychol; 2023 Jun; 143():101563. PubMed ID: 37141672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. List-method directed forgetting: the forget cue improves both encoding and retrieval of postcue information.
Pastötter B; Kliegl O; Bäuml KH
Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):861-73. PubMed ID: 22588948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatial transposition gradients in visual working memory.
Rerko L; Oberauer K; Lin HY
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 23663175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional limits in memory retrieval-revisited.
Green C; Johnston JC; Ruthruff E
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1083-98. PubMed ID: 21517217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal grouping and direction of serial recall.
Liu YS; Caplan JB
Mem Cognit; 2020 Oct; 48(7):1295-1315. PubMed ID: 32705631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal-contextual processing in working memory: evidence from delayed cued recall and delayed free recall tests.
Loaiza VM; McCabe DP
Mem Cognit; 2012 Feb; 40(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 21948350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age differences in encoding specificity.
Puglisi JT; Park DC; Smith AD; Dudley WN
J Gerontol; 1988 Nov; 43(6):P145-50. PubMed ID: 3183310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do novel associative word stem completion and cued recall share the same memory retrieval processes?
Gooding PA; Mayes AR; van Eijk R; Meudell PR; MacDonald FL
Memory; 1999 May; 7(3):323-43. PubMed ID: 10659081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
Nelson DL; Canas JJ; Bajo MT; Keelean PD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Oct; 13(4):542-52. PubMed ID: 2959738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
