These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Counterexamples in sentential reasoning. Johnson-Laird PN; Hasson U Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1105-13. PubMed ID: 14704025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why should we abandon the mental logic hypothesis? Bonatti L Cognition; 1994; 50(1-3):17-39. PubMed ID: 8039359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Evans JS; Barston JL; Pollard P Mem Cognit; 1983 May; 11(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 6621345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Conditional reasoning and causation. Cummins DD; Lubart T; Alksnis O; Rist R Mem Cognit; 1991 May; 19(3):274-82. PubMed ID: 1861613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Representations as mediators of adolescent deductive reasoning. Klaczynski PA; Narasimham G Dev Psychol; 1998 Sep; 34(5):865-81. PubMed ID: 9779734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The difference between generating counter examples and using them during reasoning. Verschueren N; Schaeken W; De Neys W; d'Ydewalle G Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1285-308. PubMed ID: 15513247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Logic and human reasoning: an assessment of the deduction paradigm. Evans JS Psychol Bull; 2002 Nov; 128(6):978-96. PubMed ID: 12405140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conditional reasoning with false premises facilitates the transition between familiar and abstract reasoning. Markovits H; Lortie-Forgues H Child Dev; 2011; 82(2):646-60. PubMed ID: 21410912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expanding the universe of categorical syllogisms: a challenge for reasoning researchers. Roberts MJ Behav Res Methods; 2005 Nov; 37(4):560-80. PubMed ID: 16629289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Children's differential performance on deductive and inductive syllogisms. Galotti KM; Komatsu LK; Voelz S Dev Psychol; 1997 Jan; 33(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 9050392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can valid inferences be suppressed? Byrne RM Cognition; 1991 Apr; 39(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 1934978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pragmatic schemas and the selection task: to reason or not to reason. Markovits H; Savary F Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 Jul; 45(1):133-48. PubMed ID: 1636008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A curious belief-bias effect: reasoning with false premises and inhibition of real-life information. Markovits H; Schroyens W Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17341013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Working memory and bias in reasoning across the life span. Gilinsky AS; Judd BB Psychol Aging; 1994 Sep; 9(3):356-71. PubMed ID: 7999321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]