These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Structural design optimization and lipolytic effect prediction of vacuum suction cryolipolysis applicator: Simulation study. Yang G; Dang H; Guo N; Cui M; Xu Y Lasers Surg Med; 2023 Feb; 55(2):233-246. PubMed ID: 36691986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noninvasive body contouring with radiofrequency, ultrasound, cryolipolysis, and low-level laser therapy. Mulholland RS; Paul MD; Chalfoun C Clin Plast Surg; 2011 Jul; 38(3):503-20, vii-iii. PubMed ID: 21824546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety of a 1064-nm robotic laser system for noninvasive lipolysis of the flanks. Fiala T; Lavin P Lasers Surg Med; 2022 Jul; 54(5):672-681. PubMed ID: 35266172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A review of research for a cryolipolysis technology. Gold MH; Vargas Lamas RE J Cosmet Dermatol; 2023 Nov; 22 Suppl 3():25-30. PubMed ID: 37988713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Synergistic effects of cryolipolysis and shock waves for noninvasive body contouring. Ferraro GA; De Francesco F; Cataldo C; Rossano F; Nicoletti G; D'Andrea F Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Jun; 36(3):666-79. PubMed ID: 22042359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of noninvasive fat reduction: A systematic review. Auh SL; Iyengar S; Weil A; Bolotin D; Cartee TV; Dover JS; Maher IA; Sobanko JF; Cohen JL; Poon E; Alam M Lasers Surg Med; 2018 Feb; 50(2):96-110. PubMed ID: 29210446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cryolipolysis for noninvasive body contouring: clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction. Krueger N; Mai SV; Luebberding S; Sadick NS Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol; 2014; 7():201-5. PubMed ID: 25061326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective Internally Controlled Blind Reviewed Clinical Evaluation of Cryolipolysis Combined With Multipolar Radiofrequency andVaripulseTechnology for Enhanced Subject Results in Circumferential Fat Reduction and Skin Laxity of the Flanks. Few J; Gold M; Sadick N J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 15(11):1354-1358. PubMed ID: 28095547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized double-blind trial evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of topical body treatment with TriHex Technology Moradi A; Poehler J; Bell M J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Mar; 19(3):677-681. PubMed ID: 32009299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Prospective Study Determining Patient Satisfaction with Combined Cryolipolysis and Shockwave Therapy Treatment for Noninvasive Body Contouring. Michon A Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Oct; 45(5):2317-2325. PubMed ID: 33515083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The safety and efficacy of thermal lipolysis of adipose tissue via ultrasound for circumference reduction: An open label, single-arm exploratory study. Otto MJ Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Oct; 48(8):734-741. PubMed ID: 27320384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and Efficacy of Bilateral Submental Cryolipolysis With Quantified 3-Dimensional Imaging of Fat Reduction and Skin Tightening. Bernstein EF; Bloom JD JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Sep; 19(5):350-357. PubMed ID: 28426847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety, tolerance, and patient satisfaction with noninvasive cryolipolysis. Dierickx CC; Mazer JM; Sand M; Koenig S; Arigon V Dermatol Surg; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1209-16. PubMed ID: 23639062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]