These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37432042)

  • 1. Impact of Biogenic Carbon Neutrality Assumption for Achieving a Net-Zero Emission Target: Insights from a Techno-Economic Analysis.
    Kouchaki-Penchah H; Bahn O; Vaillancourt K; Moreau L; Thiffault E; Levasseur A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Jul; 57(29):10615-10628. PubMed ID: 37432042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Intertemporal allocation and cost of forest carbon sequestration in China under the carbon neutrality target].
    Zhang XH; Qin HY; Huang YL; Huang YN; Qiao ZH
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2022 Sep; 33(9):2413-2421. PubMed ID: 36131657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing CO
    Hung CC; Hsieh HH; Chou WC; Liu EC; Chow CH; Chang Y; Lee TM; Santschi PH; Ranatunga RRMKP; Bacosa HP; Shih YY
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2024 Sep; 206():116664. PubMed ID: 38986397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trade-offs in using European forests to meet climate objectives.
    Luyssaert S; Marie G; Valade A; Chen YY; Njakou Djomo S; Ryder J; Otto J; Naudts K; Lansø AS; Ghattas J; McGrath MJ
    Nature; 2018 Oct; 562(7726):259-262. PubMed ID: 30305744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Technoeconomic Analysis of Negative Emissions Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage through Pyrolysis and Bioenergy District Heating Infrastructure.
    Lim TC; Cuellar A; Langseth K; Waldon JL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Feb; 56(3):1875-1884. PubMed ID: 35015535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies.
    Smith P
    Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Mar; 22(3):1315-24. PubMed ID: 26732128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Releasing global forests from human management: How much more carbon could be stored?
    Roebroek CTJ; Duveiller G; Seneviratne SI; Davin EL; Cescatti A
    Science; 2023 May; 380(6646):749-753. PubMed ID: 37200428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of Urban Expansion and In Situ Greenery on Community-Wide Carbon Emissions: Method Development and Insights from 11 US Cities.
    Milnar M; Ramaswami A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Dec; 54(24):16086-16096. PubMed ID: 33217235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do forests best mitigate CO
    Taeroe A; Mustapha WF; Stupak I; Raulund-Rasmussen K
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 197():117-129. PubMed ID: 28351817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analyses of different biogenic CO
    Liu W; Zhu Q; Zhou X; Peng C
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 652():1456-1462. PubMed ID: 30586830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental evidence shows minor contribution of nitrogen deposition to global forest carbon sequestration.
    Schulte-Uebbing LF; Ros GH; de Vries W
    Glob Chang Biol; 2022 Feb; 28(3):899-917. PubMed ID: 34699094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests.
    Pan Y; Birdsey RA; Fang J; Houghton R; Kauppi PE; Kurz WA; Phillips OL; Shvidenko A; Lewis SL; Canadell JG; Ciais P; Jackson RB; Pacala SW; McGuire AD; Piao S; Rautiainen A; Sitch S; Hayes D
    Science; 2011 Aug; 333(6045):988-93. PubMed ID: 21764754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximum potential of vegetation carbon sink in Chinese forests.
    Peng B; Zhou Z; Cai W; Li M; Xu L; He N
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 905():167325. PubMed ID: 37748614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of the Global Warming Potential of Biogenic CO
    Liu W; Zhang Z; Xie X; Yu Z; von Gadow K; Xu J; Zhao S; Yang Y
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():39857. PubMed ID: 28045111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of fuel and forest conservation on future levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide.
    Walker JC; Kasting JF
    Glob Planet Change; 1992; 97():151-89. PubMed ID: 11537854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can biomass supply meet the demands of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)?
    Jones MB; Albanito F
    Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Oct; 26(10):5358-5364. PubMed ID: 32726492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Geospatial analysis of near-term potential for carbon-negative bioenergy in the United States.
    Baik E; Sanchez DL; Turner PA; Mach KJ; Field CB; Benson SM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(13):3290-3295. PubMed ID: 29531081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Making carbon sequestration a paying proposition.
    Han FX; Lindner JS; Wang C
    Naturwissenschaften; 2007 Mar; 94(3):170-82. PubMed ID: 17103136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Carbon sink and source function of Eastern Himalayan forests: implications of change in climate and biotic variables.
    Devi NB; Lepcha NT
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Jun; 195(7):843. PubMed ID: 37318600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From sink to source: Regional variation in U.S. forest carbon futures.
    Wear DN; Coulston JW
    Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16518. PubMed ID: 26558439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.