BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37432423)

  • 1. McKeown Versus Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Patients with a History of Total Pharyngolaryngectomy: A Comparison Study.
    Kuriyama K; Okamura A; Kanie Y; Maruyama S; Sakamoto K; Kanamori J; Imamura Y; Watanabe M
    World J Surg; 2023 Oct; 47(10):2479-2487. PubMed ID: 37432423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Lin J; Kang M; Lin J; Chen S; Deng F; Han W; Lin R
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 25273657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy.
    Takahashi K; Mine S; Kozuki R; Toihata T; Okamura A; Imamura Y; Watanabe M
    Esophagus; 2019 Oct; 16(4):382-385. PubMed ID: 31104160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved anastomotic leakage rates after the "flap and wrap" reconstruction in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer.
    Slaman AE; Eshuis WJ; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Dec; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 35724430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of Patients with Anastomotic Leakage After Transhiatal, McKeown or Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
    Verstegen MHP; Slaman AE; Klarenbeek BR; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Rosman C; van Workum F
    World J Surg; 2021 Nov; 45(11):3341-3349. PubMed ID: 34373937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].
    Zhou JM; Jing SJ; Lu QT; Chu X; Xue T
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 44(6):577-580. PubMed ID: 35754233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and McKeown Esophagectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Hong Z; Cui B; Wang K; Bai X; Yang N; Zhang Y; Wu X; Cheng T; Jin D; Zhao J; Gou Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Dec; 30(13):8271-8277. PubMed ID: 37698668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Five-year Survival after McKeown Compared to Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-based Nationwide Study in Finland.
    Junttila A; Helminen O; Helmiö M; Huhta H; Kallio R; Koivukangas V; Kokkola A; Laine S; Lietzen E; Meriläinen S; Pohjanen VM; Rantanen T; Ristimäki A; Räsänen JV; Saarnio J; Sihvo E; Toikkanen V; Tyrväinen T; Valtola A; Kauppila JH;
    Ann Surg; 2023 Jun; 277(6):964-970. PubMed ID: 35819156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ivor Lewis vs Mckeown esophagectomy: analysis of operative outcomes from the ACS NSQIP database.
    Sabra MJ; Alwatari YA; Wolfe LG; Xu A; Kaplan BJ; Cassano AD; Shah RD
    Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Apr; 68(4):370-379. PubMed ID: 31933140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term health-related quality of life after McKeown and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.
    Jezerskyte E; Saadeh LM; Hagens ERC; Sprangers MAG; Noteboom L; van Laarhoven HWM; Eshuis WJ; Hulshof MCCM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Nov; 33(11):. PubMed ID: 32444879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown oesophagectomy in Chinese patients with stage IA-IIIB oesophageal squamous cell cancer: a multicentre, non-interventional and observational study.
    Zhang T; Hou X; Li Y; Fu X; Liu L; Xu L; Liu Y
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 30(6):812-819. PubMed ID: 32285107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Berkelmans GH; Klarenbeek BR; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP; Rosman C
    J Thorac Dis; 2017 Jul; 9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. PubMed ID: 28815080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of short-term outcomes between minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
    Peng X; Chen Y; Nassor Juma A; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Jiao Y; Zhang W; Zhuang W
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 May; 42(5):546-552. PubMed ID: 28626101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome of Self-Expanding Metal Stents in the Treatment of Anastomotic Leaks After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
    Plum PS; Herbold T; Berlth F; Christ H; Alakus H; Bludau M; Chang DH; Bruns CJ; Hölscher AH; Chon SH
    World J Surg; 2019 Mar; 43(3):862-869. PubMed ID: 30377723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Efficacy comparison of Sweet versus Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
    Yang X; Zhan C; Sun F; Chen L; Shi M; Jiang W; Wang Q
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):979-984. PubMed ID: 27680063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of short-term outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Zhai C; Liu Y; Li W; Xu T; Yang G; Lu H; Hu D
    J Thorac Dis; 2015 Dec; 7(12):2352-8. PubMed ID: 26793358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with decreased postoperative complications after esophagectomy.
    Dyas AR; Stuart CM; Bronsert MR; Schulick RD; McCarter MD; Meguid RA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Jul; 166(1):268-278. PubMed ID: 36577613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.