These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37433251)

  • 1. Validity of an inertial measurement unit for the assessment of range and quality of movement during head and thoracic spine movements.
    Bellosta-López P; Simonsen MB; Palsson TS; Djurtoft C; Hirata RP; Christensen SWM
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2023 Aug; 66():102826. PubMed ID: 37433251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pilot Validation Study of Inertial Measurement Units and Markerless Methods for 3D Neck and Trunk Kinematics during a Simulated Surgery Task.
    Zhang C; Greve C; Verkerke GJ; Roossien CC; Houdijk H; Hijmans JM
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 36366040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concurrent validity and reliability of measuring range of motion during the cervical flexion rotation test with a novel digital goniometer.
    Luedtke K; Schoettker-Königer T; Hall T; Reimer C; Grassold M; Hasselhoff-Styhler P; Neulinger C; Obrocki M; Przyhoda P; Schäfer A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Aug; 21(1):535. PubMed ID: 32781990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinically acceptable agreement between the ViMove wireless motion sensor system and the Vicon motion capture system when measuring lumbar region inclination motion in the sagittal and coronal planes.
    Mjøsund HL; Boyle E; Kjaer P; Mieritz RM; Skallgård T; Kent P
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):124. PubMed ID: 28327115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concurrent validity and reliability of a smartphone-based application for the head repositioning and cervical range of motion.
    Romero-Franco N; Oliva-Pascual-Vaca Á; Fernández-Domínguez JC
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2023 Apr; 68(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 36473075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of Spinal and Pelvic Kinematics Using Inertial Measurement Units in Clinical Subgroups of Persistent Non-Specific Low Back Pain.
    Sheeran L; Al-Amri M; Sparkes V; Davies JL
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Mar; 24(7):. PubMed ID: 38610338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reliability of inertial sensors for elbow and wrist range of motion assessment.
    Costa V; Ramírez Ó; Otero A; Muñoz-García D; Uribarri S; Raya R
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9687. PubMed ID: 32864213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of range and quality of neck movement using a smartphone-based application.
    Palsson TS; Christensen SW; Thomsen MH; Hirata RP
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2019 Jun; 41():64-69. PubMed ID: 30639245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A wearable inertial system to assess the cervical spine mobility: comparison with an optoelectronic-based motion capture evaluation.
    Duc C; Salvia P; Lubansu A; Feipel V; Aminian K
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jan; 36(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 24075589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation.
    Anderst WJ; Gale T; LeVasseur C; Raj S; Gongaware K; Schneider M
    Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2333-2342. PubMed ID: 30142458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of an Inertial Sensor Algorithm to Quantify Head and Trunk Movement in Healthy Young Adults and Individuals with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Parrington L; Jehu DA; Fino PC; Pearson S; El-Gohary M; King LA
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Dec; 18(12):. PubMed ID: 30572640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and Reliability of Inertial Measurement Units in Active Range of Motion Assessment in the Hip Joint.
    Stołowski Ł; Niedziela M; Lubiatowski B; Lubiatowski P; Piontek T
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Oct; 23(21):. PubMed ID: 37960493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of Attitude and Heading Reference System and Microsoft Kinect for Continuous Measurement of Cervical Range of Motion Compared to the Optical Motion Capture System.
    Song YS; Yang KY; Youn K; Yoon C; Yeom J; Hwang H; Lee J; Kim K
    Ann Rehabil Med; 2016 Aug; 40(4):568-74. PubMed ID: 27606262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel use of inertial sensors to measure the craniocervical flexion range of motion associated to the craniocervical flexion test: an observational study.
    Pérez-Fernández T; Armijo-Olivo S; Liébana S; de la Torre Ortíz PJ; Fernández-Carnero J; Raya R; Martín-Pintado-Zugasti A
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Nov; 17(1):152. PubMed ID: 33213452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating concurrent validity of inertial sensors to evaluate multiplanar spine movement.
    Beange KHE; Chan ADC; Graham RB
    J Biomech; 2024 Feb; 164():111939. PubMed ID: 38310004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Between-session reliability of opto-electronic motion capture in measuring sagittal posture and 3-D ranges of motion of the thoracolumbar spine.
    Mousavi SJ; Tromp R; Swann MC; White AP; Anderson DE
    J Biomech; 2018 Oct; 79():248-252. PubMed ID: 30213648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical Range of Motion Assessment through Inertial Technology: A Validity and Reliability Study.
    Palmieri M; Donno L; Cimolin V; Galli M
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jun; 23(13):. PubMed ID: 37447862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reliability and concurrent validity of a new iPhone® application for measuring active lumbar spine flexion and extension range of motion in patients with low back pain.
    Pourahmadi M; Momeni E; Mohseni N; Hesarikia H; Ghanjal A; Shamsoddini A
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2021 Jan; 37(1):204-217. PubMed ID: 31081417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo 3D kinematic changes in the cervical spine after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Nagamoto Y; Iwasaki M; Sugiura T; Fujimori T; Matsuo Y; Kashii M; Sakaura H; Ishii T; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 24926932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel IMU-based clinical assessment protocol for Axial Spondyloarthritis: a protocol validation study.
    Franco L; Sengupta R; Wade L; Cazzola D
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e10623. PubMed ID: 33569248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.