These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37435098)

  • 1. The role and features of peer assessment feedback in college English writing.
    Sun Q; Chen F; Yin S
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1070618. PubMed ID: 37435098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects of Teacher Feedback and Automated Feedback on Cognitive and Psychological Aspects of Foreign Language Writing: A Mixed-Methods Research.
    Wang Z; Han F
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():909802. PubMed ID: 35967647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer feedback and Chinese medical students' English academic writing development: a longitudinal intervention study.
    Wu C; Zhang YW; Li AW
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Aug; 23(1):578. PubMed ID: 37587429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Trained Peer vs. Teacher Feedback on EFL Students' Writing Performance, Self-Efficacy, and Internalization of Motivation.
    Cui Y; Schunn CD; Gai X; Jiang Y; Wang Z
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():788474. PubMed ID: 34899541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effects of Writing Anxiety and Motivation on EFL College Students' Self-Evaluative Judgments of Corrective Feedback.
    Tsao JJ; Tseng WT; Wang C
    Psychol Rep; 2017 Apr; 120(2):219-241. PubMed ID: 28558625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of providing peer feedback on learners' genre awareness in English as a foreign language business letter writing.
    Wu H; Zhu H; Yang X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1059555. PubMed ID: 36533036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chinese university students' conceptions of feedback and the relationships with self-regulated learning, self-efficacy, and English language achievement.
    Lu S; Cheng L; Chahine S
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1047323. PubMed ID: 36591039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applying Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) model to develop an online English writing course for nursing students.
    Tai HC; Pan MY; Lee BO
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Jun; 35(6):782-8. PubMed ID: 25753353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-Regulated Writing Strategy Use When Revising Upon Automated, Peer, and Teacher Feedback in an Online English as a Foreign Language Writing Course.
    Tian L; Liu Q; Zhang X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():873170. PubMed ID: 35519626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Teacher Written Feedback on English as a Foreign Language Learners' Writing: Examining Native and Nonnative English-Speaking Teachers' Practices in Feedback Provision.
    Cheng X; Zhang LJ
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():629921. PubMed ID: 33613403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of teacher-student proximity, teacher feedback, and near-seated peer groups on classroom engagement: An agent-based modeling approach.
    Dong Z; Liu H; Zheng X
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244935. PubMed ID: 33411723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding the Difference Between Self-Feedback and Peer Feedback: A Comparative Study of Their Effects on Undergraduate Students' Writing Improvement.
    Lu Q; Zhu X; Cheong CM
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():739962. PubMed ID: 34589032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The raters' differences in Arabic writing rubrics through the Many-Facet Rasch measurement model.
    Baharudin H; Maskor ZM; Matore MEEM
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():988272. PubMed ID: 36591072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment as Learning: How Does Peer Assessment Function in Students' Learning?
    Yin S; Chen F; Chang H
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():912568. PubMed ID: 35832911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tracing the Path Toward Self-Regulated Revision: An Interplay of Instructor Feedback, Peer Feedback, and Revision Goals.
    Li W; Zhang F
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():612088. PubMed ID: 33613365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Natural language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system.
    McNamara DS; Crossley SA; Roscoe R
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):499-515. PubMed ID: 23055164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical School Students' Preferences for and Perceptions of Teacher Written Corrective Feedback on English as a Second Language Academic Writing: An Intrinsic Case Study.
    Reynolds BL; Zhang X
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2022 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 36661585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learners' perceived advantages and social-affective dispositions toward online peer feedback in academic writing.
    Zhang M; He Q; Du J; Liu F; Huang B
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():973478. PubMed ID: 36204744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Explicating peer feedback quality and its impact on feedback implementation in EFL writing.
    He W; Gao Y
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1177094. PubMed ID: 37519361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring Learner Engagement With Multiple Sources of Feedback on L2 Writing Across Genres.
    Shi Y
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():758867. PubMed ID: 34721238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.