These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37435342)

  • 21. Normative anthropometry and proportions of the Kenyan-African face and comparative anthropometry in relation to African Americans and North American Whites.
    Virdi SS; Wertheim D; Naini FB
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Dec; 41(1):9. PubMed ID: 30863739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What Is the Most Beautiful Facial Proportion in the 21st Century? Comparative Study among Miss Universe, Miss Universe Thailand, Neoclassical Canons, and Facial Golden Ratios.
    Burusapat C; Lekdaeng P
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e2044. PubMed ID: 30881823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does 3-dimensional facial attractiveness relate to golden ratio, neoclassical canons, 'ideal' ratios and 'ideal' angles?
    Zwahlen RA; Tang ATH; Leung WK; Tan SK
    Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Sep; 44(1):28. PubMed ID: 36070018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models.
    Torsello F; Mirigliani L; D'Alessio R; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20529624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Anthropometric Analysis of Indian Faces: A Systematic Review.
    Uppada UK; Tauro DP; Senthilnathan KP
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2024 Jun; 23(3):451-461. PubMed ID: 38911415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults.
    Bozkir MG; Karakas P; Oguz O
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Jun; 26(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 14625792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Cross-Sectional Study to Determine and Compare the Craniofacial Anthropometric Norms in a Selected Kenyan and Chinese Population.
    Sarna K; Sonigra KJ; Ngeow WC
    Plast Surg (Oakv); 2023 Feb; 31(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 36755821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differences in horizontal, neoclassical facial canons in Chinese (Han) and North American Caucasian populations.
    Wang D; Qian G; Zhang M; Farkas LG
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 1997; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 9263550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correlation between Innercanthal Distance and Mesiodistal Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth in a Thrissur, Kerala, India, Population.
    Attokaran G; Shenoy K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 May; 17(5):382-7. PubMed ID: 27443364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Photographic facial soft tissue analysis of healthy Iranian young adults: anthropometric and angular measurements.
    Asghari A; Rajaeih S; Hassannia F; Tavakolifard N; Fattahi Neisyani H; Kamrava SK; Jalessi M; Omidian P
    Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2014; 28():49. PubMed ID: 25405115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
    Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The average Indian female nose.
    Patil SB; Kale SM; Jaiswal S; Khare N; Math M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Dec; 35(6):1036-42. PubMed ID: 21805234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A systematic review of interethnic variability in facial dimensions.
    Fang F; Clapham PJ; Chung KC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Feb; 127(2):874-881. PubMed ID: 21285791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Do Aesthetic Average Nasal Parameters Matter For Rhinoplasty in India?
    Parab SR; Khan MM
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 71(Suppl 3):2011-2018. PubMed ID: 31763285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Anthropometric and aesthetic analysis of the Indian American woman's face.
    Husein OF; Sepehr A; Garg R; Sina-Khadiv M; Gattu S; Waltzman J; Wu EC; Shieh M; Heitmann GM; Galle SE
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1825-31. PubMed ID: 19962360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Science Behind Nefertiti's Beauty: A Plastic Surgeon's Analysis.
    Chauhan N
    Indian J Plast Surg; 2022 Dec; 55(4):357-363. PubMed ID: 36683897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Expanding the Classic Facial Canons: Quantifying Intercanthal Distance in a Diverse Patient Population.
    Bouhadana G; Gornitsky J; Saleh E; Oliveira Trabelsi N; Borsuk DE
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2022 Apr; 10(4):e4268. PubMed ID: 35475286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft-tissue facial profile of Indian adults.
    Pandian KS; Krishnan S; Kumar SA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 29652003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races.
    Farkas LG; Katic MJ; Forrest CR; Alt KW; Bagic I; Baltadjiev G; Cunha E; Cvicelová M; Davies S; Erasmus I; Gillett-Netting R; Hajnis K; Kemkes-Grottenthaler A; Khomyakova I; Kumi A; Kgamphe JS; Kayo-daigo N; Le T; Malinowski A; Negasheva M; Manolis S; Ogetürk M; Parvizrad R; Rösing F; Sahu P; Sforza C; Sivkov S; Sultanova N; Tomazo-Ravnik T; Tóth G; Uzun A; Yahia E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 16(4):615-46. PubMed ID: 16077306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Morphological quantitative criteria and aesthetic evaluation of eight female Han face types.
    Zhao Q; Zhou R; Zhang X; Sun H; Lu X; Xia D; Song M; Liang Y
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 37(2):445-53. PubMed ID: 23404449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.