These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3743545)

  • 1. A psychophysical study of the effects of load and frequency upon selection of workload in repetitive lifting.
    Nicholson LM; Legg SJ
    Ergonomics; 1986 Jul; 29(7):903-11. PubMed ID: 3743545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workload by Chinese subjects.
    Zhu ZX; Zhang ZJ
    Ergonomics; 1990 Jul; 33(7):875-84. PubMed ID: 2226423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximum acceptable work loads for repetitive lifting tasks. An experimental evaluation of psychophysical criteria.
    Gamberale F
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1988; 14 Suppl 1():85-7. PubMed ID: 3393892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychophysical capacity of industrial workers for lifting symmetrical and asymmetrical loads symmetrically and asymmetrically for 8 h work shifts.
    Mital A
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):745-54. PubMed ID: 1633787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of lifting frequency and technique on physical fatigue with special reference to psychophysical methodology and metabolic rate.
    Garg A; Saxena U
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Oct; 40(10):894-503. PubMed ID: 525616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modelling of maximum acceptable load of lifting by physical factors.
    Jiang BC; Ayoub MM
    Ergonomics; 1987 Mar; 30(3):529-38. PubMed ID: 3595550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychophysical determination of load carrying capacity for a 1-h work period by Chinese males.
    Wu SP; Chen CC
    Ergonomics; 2001 Sep; 44(11):1008-23. PubMed ID: 11693245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Methods of assessing the physical work capacity of servicemen].
    Apanasenko GL; Kuleshov VI; Novozhilov GN
    Voen Med Zh; 1974 Jun; (6):43-6. PubMed ID: 4460339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The role of physical load in the reaction of the circulatory system to professional work].
    Makowiec-Dabrowska T; Bortkiewicz A; Radwan-Włodarczyk Z; Koszada-Włodarczyk W; Leśnik H; Gregorowicz K
    Med Pr; 1991; 42(6):431-9. PubMed ID: 1808451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workloads for an 8-hour work-day using psychophysical and subjective rating methods.
    Legg SJ; Myles WS
    Ergonomics; 1981 Dec; 24(12):907-16. PubMed ID: 7338215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A psychophysical approach to determine the frequency and duration of work-rest schedules for manual handling operations.
    Genaidy AM; al-Rayes S
    Ergonomics; 1993 May; 36(5):509-18. PubMed ID: 8500472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximum acceptable forces of dynamic pushing: comparison of two techniques.
    Ciriello VM; McGorry RW; Martin SE; Bezverkhny IB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 9973870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of work load and related factors during asymmetric lifting with surface electromyography].
    Chen J; Yang L
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 24(4):198-200. PubMed ID: 16701028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Margin of safety for the human back: a probable consensus based on published studies.
    Kumar S; Mital A
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):769-81. PubMed ID: 1633788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Handle positions and angles in a dynamic lifting task. Part 2. Psychophysical measures and heart rate.
    Drury CG; Deeb JM
    Ergonomics; 1986 Jun; 29(6):769-77. PubMed ID: 3743535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Design of an algorithm for predicting successful performance of operators with little training selection].
    Khorishko AI; Gorskiĭ IuV; Astapov IuV; Kormachev VV
    Voen Med Zh; 1987 Apr; (4):33-5. PubMed ID: 3604081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Job evaluation in worker fitness determination.
    Rodgers SH
    Occup Med; 1988; 3(2):219-39. PubMed ID: 3287655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shoulder joint load and muscular activity during lifting.
    Arborelius UP; Ekholm J; Németh G; Svensson O; Nisell R
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1986; 18(2):71-82. PubMed ID: 3775305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychophysical lifting capacity over extended periods.
    Fernandez JE; Ayoub MM; Smith JL
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 2009847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.