These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3743796)

  • 1. Comparison of fecundability with fresh and frozen semen in therapeutic donor insemination.
    Bordson BL; Ricci E; Dickey RP; Dunaway H; Taylor SN; Curole DN
    Fertil Steril; 1986 Sep; 46(3):466-9. PubMed ID: 3743796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Therapeutic donor insemination with frozen semen.
    Scott SG; Mortimer D; Taylor PJ; Leader A; Pattinson HA
    CMAJ; 1990 Aug; 143(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 2383847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved cryopreserved semen fecundability in an alternating fresh-frozen artificial insemination program.
    Brown CA; Boone WR; Shapiro SS
    Fertil Steril; 1988 Nov; 50(5):825-7. PubMed ID: 3181497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Artificial donor insemination: fresh versus frozen semen; the patient as her own control.
    Richter MA; Haning RV; Shapiro SS
    Fertil Steril; 1984 Feb; 41(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 6698221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Luteinizing hormone and ovulation timing in a therapeutic donor insemination program using frozen semen.
    Kossoy LR; Hill GA; Parker RA; Rogers BJ; Dalglish CS; Herbert GM; Wentz AC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 160(5 Pt 1):1169-72. PubMed ID: 2729391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting pregnancy rates in a donor insemination program using frozen semen.
    Hammond MG; Jordan S; Sloan CS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Sep; 155(3):480-5. PubMed ID: 3752170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of ovulatory dysfunction and timing of insemination on the success of artificial insemination donor (AID) with fresh or cryopreserved semen.
    Smith KD; Rodriguez-Rigau LJ; Steinberger E
    Fertil Steril; 1981 Oct; 36(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 7286272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategies to improve the fertility of fresh and frozen donkey semen.
    de Oliveira JV; Oliveira PV; Melo e Oña CM; Guasti PN; Monteiro GA; Sancler da Silva YF; Papa Pde M; Alvarenga MA; Dell'Aqua Junior JA; Papa FO
    Theriogenology; 2016 Apr; 85(7):1267-73. PubMed ID: 26806444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semen analysis data from fresh and cryopreserved donor ejaculates: comparison of cryoprotectants and pregnancy rates.
    Keel BA; Webster BW
    Fertil Steril; 1989 Jul; 52(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 2744176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pregnancy rates with fresh versus computer-controlled cryopreserved semen for artificial insemination by donor in a private practice setting.
    DiMarzo SJ; Huang J; Kennedy JF; Villanueva B; Hebert SA; Young PE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 162(6):1483-8; discussion 1488-90. PubMed ID: 2360580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Therapeutic donor insemination: fresh versus frozen.
    Barlet EM; Penney LL
    Mo Med; 1994 Feb; 91(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 8183223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Therapeutic donor insemination: the impact of insemination timing with the aid of a urinary luteinizing hormone immunoassay.
    Kossoy LR; Hill GA; Herbert CM; Brodie BL; Dalglish CS; Dupont WD; Wentz AC
    Fertil Steril; 1988 Jun; 49(6):1026-9. PubMed ID: 3286288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spermatozoal characteristics from fresh and frozen donor semen and their correlation with fertility outcome after intrauterine insemination.
    Marshburn PB; McIntire D; Carr BR; Byrd W
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Jul; 58(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 1624002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Therapeutic cup insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm: prognostic value of cervical mucus score at insemination and the number of motile sperm in mucus at 24 hours.
    Meyer WR; Smith PM; Clark MR; Cusmano LL; Fritz MA
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Sep; 66(3):435-9. PubMed ID: 8751744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artificial donor insemination frozen versus fresh semen.
    Leeton J; Selwood T; Trounson A; Wood C
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Nov; 20(4):205-7. PubMed ID: 6940563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of different artificial insemination techniques and sperm doses on fertility of normal mares and mares with abnormal reproductive history.
    Sieme H; Bonk A; Hamann H; Klug E; Katila T
    Theriogenology; 2004 Sep; 62(5):915-28. PubMed ID: 15251243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The successful use of hyperstimulated washed therapeutic donor insemination after standard therapeutic donor insemination has failed.
    Dow MP; Jones JM; Dumesic DA; Lu Y; Shapiro SS
    Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1996; 41(6):516-21. PubMed ID: 9010745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of factors affecting the pregnancy rate of mares after inseminations with cooled transported stallion semen.
    Kareskoski M; Venhoranta H; Virtala AM; Katila T
    Theriogenology; 2019 Mar; 127():7-14. PubMed ID: 30611014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrauterine insemination of cryopreserved donor semen.
    Silva PD; Meisch J; Schauberger CW
    Fertil Steril; 1989 Aug; 52(2):243-5. PubMed ID: 2753173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of semen and donor factors on the success rate of artificial insemination with frozen semen.
    Mahadevan MM; Trounson AO; Milne BJ; Leeton JF
    Clin Reprod Fertil; 1982 Sep; 1(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 6897907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.