146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37438966)
21. A dosimetric comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy in localized cervical cancer radiotherapy.
Wali L; Helal A; Darwesh R; Attar M
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(3):473-483. PubMed ID: 30958322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Daily online cone beam computed tomography to assess interfractional motion in patients with intact cervical cancer.
Tyagi N; Lewis JH; Yashar CM; Vo D; Jiang SB; Mundt AJ; Mell LK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):273-80. PubMed ID: 21109360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Interfractional variation in bladder volume and its impact on cervical cancer radiotherapy: Clinical significance of portable bladder scanner.
Luo H; Jin F; Yang D; Wang Y; Li C; Guo M; Ran X; Liu X; Zhou Q; Wu Y
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4412. PubMed ID: 27370156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improved Dosimetry with Daily Online Adaptive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer: Waltzing the Pear.
Yen A; Zhong X; Lin MH; Nwachukwu C; Albuquerque K; Hrycushko B
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2024 Mar; 36(3):165-172. PubMed ID: 38246849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dose Prediction Models Based on Geometric and Plan Optimization Parameter for Adjuvant Radiotherapy Planning Design in Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy.
Tang H; Chen Y; Jiang J; Li K; Zeng J; Hu Z; Yin R
J Healthc Eng; 2021; 2021():7026098. PubMed ID: 34804459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of online/offline image guidance/adaptation approaches for prostate cancer radiation therapy.
Qin A; Sun Y; Liang J; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Apr; 91(5):1026-33. PubMed ID: 25832693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Anisotropic Bladder Planning Target Volume in Bladder Radiation Therapy.
Adil K; Popovic M; Cury FL; Faria SL; Duclos M; Souhami L
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jan; 9(1):24-28. PubMed ID: 30096379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dosimetric and feasibility evaluation of a CBCT-based daily adaptive radiotherapy protocol for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Branco D; Mayadev J; Moore K; Ray X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 24(1):e13783. PubMed ID: 36208134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Feasibility study of toxicity outcomes using GEC-ESTRO contouring guidelines on CT based instead of MRI-based planning in locally advanced cervical cancer patients.
Koh V; Choo BA; Lee KM; Tan TH; Low JH; Ng SY; Ilancheran A; Shen L; Tang J
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(1):126-132. PubMed ID: 27816539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and comparison with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in the postoperative treatment of cervical cancer.
Marjanovic D; Plesinac Karapandzic V; Stojanovic Rundic S; Tomasevic A; Saric M; Miskovic I; Nidzovic B; Mikovic M; Petrasinovic P
J BUON; 2019; 24(5):2028-2034. PubMed ID: 31786871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A dosimetric analysis of volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy with jaw width restriction vs 7 field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for definitive treatment of cervical cancer.
Huang B; Fang Z; Huang Y; Lin P; Chen Z
Br J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 87(1039):20140183. PubMed ID: 24834477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dosimetric effects of adaptive prostate cancer radiotherapy in an MR-linac workflow.
Mannerberg A; Persson E; Jonsson J; Gustafsson CJ; Gunnlaugsson A; Olsson LE; Ceberg S
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jul; 15(1):168. PubMed ID: 32650811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Relationship between pelvic organ-at-risk dose and clinical target volume in postprostatectomy patients receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Stanic S; Mathai M; Cui J; Purdy JA; Valicenti RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):1897-902. PubMed ID: 21536391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Online adaptive radiotherapy compared to plan selection for rectal cancer: quantifying the benefit.
de Jong R; Crama KF; Visser J; van Wieringen N; Wiersma J; Geijsen ED; Bel A
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jul; 15(1):162. PubMed ID: 32641080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of plan quality and robustness of IMPT and helical IMRT for cervical cancer.
Shang H; Pu Y; Wang W; Dai Z; Jin F
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Feb; 15(1):34. PubMed ID: 32054496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for imaging-based clinical target volume contours in cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Zolciak-Siwinska A; Kowalczyk A; Sikorska K; Bijok M; Michalski W; Gruszczynska E
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(4):667-672. PubMed ID: 29764769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A knowledge-based organ dose prediction tool for brachytherapy treatment planning of patients with cervical cancer.
Yusufaly TI; Kallis K; Simon A; Mayadev J; Yashar CM; Einck JP; Mell LK; Brown D; Scanderbeg D; Hild SJ; Covele B; Moore KL; Meyers SM
Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(5):624-634. PubMed ID: 32513446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cancer brachytherapy target and normal tissue contouring.
Eskander RN; Scanderbeg D; Saenz CC; Brown M; Yashar C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Jan; 20(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 20130502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of dosimetric differences between CT and MRI derived target volumes for external beam cervical cancer radiotherapy.
Batumalai V; Burke S; Roach D; Lim K; Dinsdale G; Jameson M; Ochoa C; Veera J; Holloway L; Vinod S
Br J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 93(1114):20190564. PubMed ID: 32516544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
