These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37439178)

  • 1. [Quantitative evaluation of radiotherapy plan in precise external beam radiotherapy process management for cervical cancer].
    Guo Y; Li T; Yang X; Qi Z; Chen L; Huang S
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2023 Jun; 43(6):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 37439178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tree-based exploration of the optimization objectives for automatic cervical cancer IMRT treatment planning.
    Wang H; Wang R; Liu J; Zhang J; Yao K; Yue H; Zhang Y; You J; Wu H
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20210214. PubMed ID: 34111955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Highly Efficient Training, Refinement, and Validation of a Knowledge-based Planning Quality-Control System for Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials.
    Li N; Carmona R; Sirak I; Kasaova L; Followill D; Michalski J; Bosch W; Straube W; Mell LK; Moore KL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jan; 97(1):164-172. PubMed ID: 27979445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dosimetric comparison of different multileaf collimator leaves in treatment planning of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
    Wang S; Ai P; Xie L; Xu Q; Bai S; Lu Y; Li P; Chen N
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 24099965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intensity modulated proton beam radiation for brachytherapy in patients with cervical carcinoma.
    Clivio A; Kluge A; Cozzi L; Köhler C; Neumann O; Vanetti E; Wlodarczyk W; Marnitz S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):897-903. PubMed ID: 24119834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiobiological optimization comparison between pulse-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Annede P; Dumas I; Schernberg A; Tailleur A; Fumagalli I; Bockel S; Mignot F; Kissel M; Deutsch E; Haie-Meder C; Chargari C
    Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):370-377. PubMed ID: 30797698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
    Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
    Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
    World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic and prostate cancer using pulsed low-dose rate delivery techniques.
    Li J; Lang J; Wang P; Kang S; Lin MH; Chen X; Chen F; Guo M; Chen L; Ma CM
    Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 25087084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of offline adaptive planning techniques in image-guided brachytherapy of cervical cancer.
    Liu H; Kinard J; Maurer J; Shang Q; Vanderstraeten C; Hayes L; Sintay B; Wiant D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):316-322. PubMed ID: 30284370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CT-guided intracavitary radiotherapy for cervical cancer: Comparison of conventional point A plan with clinical target volume-based three-dimensional plan using dose-volume parameters.
    Shin KH; Kim TH; Cho JK; Kim JY; Park SY; Park SY; Kim DY; Chie EK; Pyo HR; Cho KH
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 16169676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of conventional and CT-based planning for intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: target volume coverage and organs at risk doses.
    Onal C; Arslan G; Topkan E; Pehlivan B; Yavuz M; Oymak E; Yavuz A
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Jul; 28(1):95. PubMed ID: 19570212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An integrated strategy of biological and physical constraints in biological optimization for cervical carcinoma.
    Feng Z; Tao C; Zhu J; Chen J; Yu G; Qin S; Yin Y; Li D
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Apr; 12(1):64. PubMed ID: 28376900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Focal boost to residual gross tumor volume in brachytherapy for cervical cancer-A feasibility study.
    Thiruthaneeswaran N; Groom N; Lowe G; Bryant L; Hoskin PJ
    Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(1):181-186. PubMed ID: 29153466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bladder distension improves the dosimetry of organs at risk during intracavitary cervical high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
    Harmon G; Chinsky B; Surucu M; Harkenrider M; Small W
    Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 26521661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deformable image registration-based contour propagation yields clinically acceptable plans for MRI-based cervical cancer brachytherapy planning.
    Chapman CH; Polan D; Vineberg K; Jolly S; Maturen KE; Brock KK; Prisciandaro JI
    Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(2):360-367. PubMed ID: 29331573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D CT-based volumetric dose assessment of 2D plans using GEC-ESTRO guidelines for cervical cancer brachytherapy.
    Gao M; Albuquerque K; Chi A; Rusu I
    Brachytherapy; 2010; 9(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 19853536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy.
    Cozzi L; Dinshaw KA; Shrivastava SK; Mahantshetty U; Engineer R; Deshpande DD; Jamema SV; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Nicolini G; Fogliata A
    Radiother Oncol; 2008 Nov; 89(2):180-91. PubMed ID: 18692929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose-volume histogram analysis of composite EQD2 dose distributions using the central shielding technique in cervical cancer radiotherapy.
    Tamaki T; Noda SE; Ohno T; Kumazaki Y; Kato S; Nakano T
    Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(5):598-606. PubMed ID: 27475482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional arterial spin labeling-guided dose painting radiotherapy for non-enhancing low-grade gliomas.
    Zhu Z; Gong G; Wang L; Su Y; Lu J; Yin Y
    Jpn J Radiol; 2023 Mar; 41(3):335-346. PubMed ID: 36342645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.