BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37439272)

  • 1. Comparison of auditory evoked potential thresholds in three shark species.
    Nieder C; Rapson J; Montgomery JC; Radford CA
    J Exp Biol; 2023 Sep; 226(18):. PubMed ID: 37439272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of acoustic particle acceleration detection capabilities in three shark species.
    Nieder C; Gibbs BJ; Rapson J; McLay J; Montgomery JC; Radford CA
    J Exp Biol; 2023 Sep; 226(18):. PubMed ID: 37665253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Field hearing measurements of the Atlantic sharpnose shark Rhizoprionodon terraenovae.
    Casper BM; Mann DA
    J Fish Biol; 2009 Dec; 75(10):2768-76. PubMed ID: 20738522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Operant conditioning as a tool to assess hearing abilities in sharks.
    Nieder C; Rapson J; Holland K; Meyer C; Montgomery J; Radford C
    J Fish Biol; 2023 Aug; 103(2):411-424. PubMed ID: 37204109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dipole hearing measurements in elasmobranch fishes.
    Casper BM; Mann DA
    J Exp Biol; 2007 Jan; 210(Pt 1):75-81. PubMed ID: 17170150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The directional hearing abilities of two species of bamboo sharks.
    Casper BM; Mann DA
    J Exp Biol; 2007 Feb; 210(Pt 3):505-11. PubMed ID: 17234620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ontogenetic investigation of underwater hearing capabilities in loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) using a dual testing approach.
    Lavender AL; Bartol SM; Bartol IK
    J Exp Biol; 2014 Jul; 217(Pt 14):2580-9. PubMed ID: 24855679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diverse Activity Rhythms in Sharks (Elasmobranchii).
    Kelly ML; Murray ERP; Kerr CC; Radford CA; Collin SP; Lesku JA; Hemmi JM
    J Biol Rhythms; 2020 Oct; 35(5):476-488. PubMed ID: 32525441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Underwater hearing in the loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta): a comparison of behavioral and auditory evoked potential audiograms.
    Martin KJ; Alessi SC; Gaspard JC; Tucker AD; Bauer GB; Mann DA
    J Exp Biol; 2012 Sep; 215(Pt 17):3001-9. PubMed ID: 22875768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sound pressure and particle acceleration audiograms in three marine fish species from the Adriatic Sea.
    Wysocki LE; Codarin A; Ladich F; Picciulin M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):2100-7. PubMed ID: 19813819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Underwater hearing in sea snakes (Hydrophiinae): first evidence of auditory evoked potential thresholds.
    Chapuis L; Kerr CC; Collin SP; Hart NS; Sanders KL
    J Exp Biol; 2019 Jul; 222(Pt 14):. PubMed ID: 31345949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Electrophysiological Auditory Measures in Fishes.
    Maruska KP; Sisneros JA
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 877():227-54. PubMed ID: 26515317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diet, trophic interactions and possible ecological role of commercial sharks and batoids in northern Peruvian waters.
    Gonzalez-Pestana A; Mangel JC; Alfaro-Córdova E; Acuña-Perales N; Córdova-Zavaleta F; Segura-Cobeña E; Benites D; Espinoza M; Coasaca-Céspedes J; Jiménez A; Pingo S; Moscoso V; Alfaro-Shigueto J; Espinoza P
    J Fish Biol; 2021 Mar; 98(3):768-783. PubMed ID: 33222156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physiological responses to hypersalinity correspond to nursery ground usage in two inshore shark species (Mustelus antarcticus and Galeorhinus galeus).
    Tunnah L; MacKellar SR; Barnett DA; MacCormack TJ; Stehfest KM; Morash AJ; Semmens JM; Currie S
    J Exp Biol; 2016 Jul; 219(Pt 13):2028-38. PubMed ID: 27207636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing in fishes under noise conditions.
    Wysocki LE; Ladich F
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 6(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 15735936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation between auditory sensitivity and vocalization in anabantoid fishes.
    Ladich F; Yan HY
    J Comp Physiol A; 1998 Jun; 182(6):737-46. PubMed ID: 9631554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pressure and particle motion detection thresholds in fish: a re-examination of salient auditory cues in teleosts.
    Radford CA; Montgomery JC; Caiger P; Higgs DM
    J Exp Biol; 2012 Oct; 215(Pt 19):3429-35. PubMed ID: 22693030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-related loss of auditory sensitivity in the zebrafish (Danio rerio).
    Zeng R; Brown AD; Rogers LS; Lawrence OT; Clark JI; Sisneros JA
    Hear Res; 2021 Apr; 403():108189. PubMed ID: 33556775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects.
    Tomlin D; Rance G; Graydon K; Tsialios I
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):580-8. PubMed ID: 17062499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sound detection by the longfin squid (Loligo pealeii) studied with auditory evoked potentials: sensitivity to low-frequency particle motion and not pressure.
    Mooney TA; Hanlon RT; Christensen-Dalsgaard J; Madsen PT; Ketten DR; Nachtigall PE
    J Exp Biol; 2010 Nov; 213(Pt 21):3748-59. PubMed ID: 20952625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.