BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37439638)

  • 1. Effects of landscape and distance in automatic audio based bird species identification.
    Somervuo P; Lauha P; Lokki T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jul; 154(1):245-254. PubMed ID: 37439638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PROTAX-Sound: A probabilistic framework for automated animal sound identification.
    de Camargo UM; Somervuo P; Ovaskainen O
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184048. PubMed ID: 28863178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semi-automatic classification of bird vocalizations using spectral peak tracks.
    Chen Z; Maher RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Nov; 120(5 Pt 1):2974-84. PubMed ID: 17139754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bird species detection by an observer and an autonomous sound recorder in two different environments: Forest and farmland.
    Kułaga K; Budka M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211970. PubMed ID: 30730984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic classification of multiple simultaneous bird species: a multi-instance multi-label approach.
    Briggs F; Lakshminarayanan B; Neal L; Fern XZ; Raich R; Hadley SJ; Hadley AS; Betts MG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4640-50. PubMed ID: 22712937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Animal Sound Identifier (ASI): software for automated identification of vocal animals.
    Ovaskainen O; Moliterno de Camargo U; Somervuo P
    Ecol Lett; 2018 Aug; 21(8):1244-1254. PubMed ID: 29938881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic recognition of harmonic bird sounds using a frequency track extraction algorithm.
    Heller JR; Pinezich JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1830-7. PubMed ID: 19045673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection ranges of forest bird vocalisations: guidelines for passive acoustic monitoring.
    Winiarska D; Szymański P; Osiejuk TS
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):894. PubMed ID: 38195687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Autonomous sound recording outperforms human observation for sampling birds: a systematic map and user guide.
    Darras K; Batáry P; Furnas BJ; Grass I; Mulyani YA; Tscharntke T
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Sep; 29(6):e01954. PubMed ID: 31206926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reverberation and frequency attenuation in forests--implications for acoustic communication in animals.
    Padgham M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan; 115(1):402-10. PubMed ID: 14759031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Local compressed convex spectral embedding for bird species identification.
    Thakur A; Abrol V; Sharma P; Rajan P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):3819. PubMed ID: 29960469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utilizing the Cyberforest live sound system with social media to remotely conduct woodland bird censuses in Central Japan.
    Saito K; Nakamura K; Ueta M; Kurosawa R; Fujiwara A; Kobayashi HH; Nakayama M; Toko A; Nagahama K
    Ambio; 2015 Nov; 44 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):572-83. PubMed ID: 26508345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Putative audio recordings of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis).
    Collins MD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1626-30. PubMed ID: 21428525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognition of bird species based on spike model using bird dataset.
    Mohanty R; Kumar Mallik B; Singh Solanki S
    Data Brief; 2020 Apr; 29():105301. PubMed ID: 32140516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust sound event detection in bioacoustic sensor networks.
    Lostanlen V; Salamon J; Farnsworth A; Kelling S; Bello JP
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0214168. PubMed ID: 31647815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Open set classification strategies for long-term environmental field recordings for bird species recognition.
    Morgan MM; Braasch J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jun; 151(6):4028. PubMed ID: 35778198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic approach as an alternative to human-based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows.
    Budka M; Jobda M; Szałański P; Piórkowski H
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0266557. PubMed ID: 35395028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioacoustic classification of avian calls from raw sound waveforms with an open-source deep learning architecture.
    Bravo Sanchez FJ; Hossain MR; English NB; Moore ST
    Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):15733. PubMed ID: 34344970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An annotated set of audio recordings of Eastern North American birds containing frequency, time, and species information.
    Chronister LM; Rhinehart TA; Place A; Kitzes J
    Ecology; 2021 Jun; 102(6):e03329. PubMed ID: 33705568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Observer-free experimental evaluation of habitat and distance effects on the detection of anuran and bird vocalizations.
    MacLaren AR; Crump PS; Royle JA; Forstner MRJ
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Dec; 8(24):12991-13003. PubMed ID: 30619599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.