208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37439819)
1. Do advances in technology translate to improved outcomes? Comparing robotic bariatric surgery outcomes over two-time intervals utilizing the MBSAQIP database.
Coker A; Sebastian R; Tatum J; Cornejo J; Zevallos A; Li C; Schweitzer M; Adrales G
Surg Endosc; 2023 Oct; 37(10):7970-7979. PubMed ID: 37439819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database.
Sebastian R; Howell MH; Chang KH; Adrales G; Magnuson T; Schweitzer M; Nguyen H
Surg Endosc; 2019 May; 33(5):1600-1612. PubMed ID: 30225604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database.
Acevedo E; Mazzei M; Zhao H; Lu X; Edwards MA
Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1573-1584. PubMed ID: 31209611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic approach to concurrent bariatric surgery and hiatal hernia repair: propensity score matching analysis using the 2015-2018 MBSAQIP.
Sebastian R; Ghanem OM; Cornejo J; Ruttger T; Mayuiers M; Adrales G; Li C
Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6886-6895. PubMed ID: 35020060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a MBSAQIP analysis.
Fazl Alizadeh R; Li S; Inaba CS; Dinicu AI; Hinojosa MW; Smith BR; Stamos MJ; Nguyen NT
Surg Endosc; 2019 Mar; 33(3):917-922. PubMed ID: 30128823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elective robotic-assisted bariatric surgery: Is it worth the money? A national database analysis.
Pokala B; Samuel S; Yanala U; Armijo P; Kothari V
Am J Surg; 2020 Dec; 220(6):1445-1450. PubMed ID: 32917364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass performed in a community hospital setting: the future of bariatric surgery?
Park CW; Lam EC; Walsh TM; Karimoto M; Ma AT; Koo M; Hammill C; Murayama K; Lorenzo CS; Bueno R
Surg Endosc; 2011 Oct; 25(10):3312-21. PubMed ID: 21614667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Super-obese.
Nasser H; Ivanics T; Ranjal RS; Leonard-Murali S; Genaw J
J Surg Res; 2020 May; 249():34-41. PubMed ID: 31918328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass conversion versus primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a propensity score matching analysis.
O'Laughlin M; Cornejo J; Zevallos A; Coker A; Schweitzer M; Adrales G; Li C; Sebastian R
Surg Endosc; 2023 Oct; 37(10):7947-7954. PubMed ID: 37433912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as a Revisional Bariatric Procedure: a Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.
Rebecchi F; Ugliono E; Allaix ME; Toppino M; Borello A; Morino M
Obes Surg; 2020 Jan; 30(1):11-17. PubMed ID: 31372875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Australian experience with robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with comparison to a conventional laparoscopic series.
Soon DSC; Moar X; Lee DJ; Moore P; Clough A
Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):4025-4031. PubMed ID: 34524534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as a Reoperative Bariatric Procedure.
Bindal V; Gonzalez-Heredia R; Elli EF
Obes Surg; 2015 Oct; 25(10):1810-5. PubMed ID: 25720516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of Robotics in Learning Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Retrospective Analysis of 214 Laparoscopic and Robotic Procedures : Robotic Vs. Laparoscopic RYGB.
Beckmann JH; Bernsmeier A; Kersebaum JN; Mehdorn AS; von Schönfels W; Taivankhuu T; Laudes M; Schafmayer C; Egberts JH; Becker T
Obes Surg; 2020 Jun; 30(6):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 32124220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in the utilization and perioperative outcomes of primary robotic bariatric surgery from 2015 to 2018: a study of 46,764 patients from the MBSAQIP data registry.
Tatarian T; Yang J; Wang J; Docimo S; Talamini M; Pryor AD; Spaniolas K
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3915-3922. PubMed ID: 32737605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy outcomes in multiple staple line treatment modalities from 2015 to 2019: a 5-year propensity score-adjusted MBSAQIP® analysis.
Bennett WC; Park J; Mostellar M; Garbarine IC; Sanchez-Casalongue ME; Farrell TM; Zhou R
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1401-1411. PubMed ID: 35701675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery Justified? An MBSAQIP Analysis.
Seton T; Mahan M; Dove J; Villanueva H; Obradovic V; Falvo A; Horsley R; Petrick A; Parker DM
Obes Surg; 2022 Dec; 32(12):3863-3868. PubMed ID: 36264443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 30-day outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: First analysis based on MBSAQIP.
Lundberg PW; Stoltzfus J; El Chaar M
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2019 Jan; 15(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 30497847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery in a Complex Patient Population.
Gray KD; Moore MD; Elmously A; Bellorin O; Zarnegar R; Dakin G; Pomp A; Afaneh C
Obes Surg; 2018 Jul; 28(7):1852-1859. PubMed ID: 29417487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 3-Year MBSAQIP propensity-matched analysis of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with concomitant cholecystectomy: Is the robotic or laparoscopic approach preferred?
Falvo AM; Vacharathit V; Dove J; Fluck M; Daouadi M; Gabrielsen J; Horsley R; Petrick A; Parker DM
Surg Endosc; 2021 Aug; 35(8):4712-4718. PubMed ID: 32959181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evolution of outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery: first report based on MBSAQIP database.
Pastrana M; Stoltzfus J; AlMandini A; El Chaar M
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2020 Jul; 16(7):916-922. PubMed ID: 32340825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
