BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37439982)

  • 1. Quantitation of DNA Using the Applied Biosystems Quantifiler
    Knight KL; Mauriello A; Williams G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2685():175-188. PubMed ID: 37439982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct qPCR quantification using the Quantifiler(®) Trio DNA quantification kit.
    Liu JY
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():10-9. PubMed ID: 25047573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A performance study on three qPCR quantification kits and their compatibilities with the 6-dye DNA profiling systems.
    Lin SW; Li C; Ip SCY
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():72-83. PubMed ID: 29202296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of Reduced Reagent Volumes in the Implementation of the Quantifiler
    Cho Y; Kim HS; Kim MH; Park M; Kwon H; Lee YH; Lee DS
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):517-525. PubMed ID: 28631292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifiler® Trio Kit and forensic samples management: a matter of degradation.
    Vernarecci S; Ottaviani E; Agostino A; Mei E; Calandro L; Montagna P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():77-85. PubMed ID: 25544252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developmental validation of the Quantifiler(®) HP and Trio Kits for human DNA quantification in forensic samples.
    Holt A; Wootton SC; Mulero JJ; Brzoska PM; Langit E; Green RL
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():145-57. PubMed ID: 26774100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of four commercial quantitative real-time PCR kits with inhibited and degraded samples.
    Holmes AS; Houston R; Elwick K; Gangitano D; Hughes-Stamm S
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 May; 132(3):691-701. PubMed ID: 29177703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Quantifiler(®) Trio and InnoQuant™ human DNA quantification kits for detection of DNA degradation in developed and aged fingerprints.
    Goecker ZC; Swiontek SE; Lakhtakia A; Roy R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():132-138. PubMed ID: 27107968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative PCR overestimation of DNA in samples contaminated with tin.
    Bonsu DNO; Higgins D; Simon C; Goodwin CS; Henry JM; Austin JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1302-1309. PubMed ID: 37326229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. QIAGEN's Investigator
    Bonnette MD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2685():189-204. PubMed ID: 37439983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developmental validation of the quantifiler real-time PCR kits for the quantification of human nuclear DNA samples.
    Green RL; Roinestad IC; Boland C; Hennessy LK
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):809-25. PubMed ID: 16078482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metal-DNA interactions: Exploring the impact of metal ions on key stages of forensic DNA analysis.
    Bonsu DNO; Higgins D; Simon C; Henry JM; Austin JJ
    Electrophoresis; 2024 May; 45(9-10):779-793. PubMed ID: 37638716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of metal ion PCR inhibitors on results obtained with the Quantifiler(®) Human DNA Quantification Kit.
    Combs LG; Warren JE; Huynh V; Castaneda J; Golden TD; Roby RK
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():180-189. PubMed ID: 26240969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis.
    Francisco DO; Lopez LF; Gonçalves FT; Fridman C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102307. PubMed ID: 32447230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of humic acid on DNA quantification with Quantifiler® Human DNA Quantification kit and short tandem repeat amplification efficiency.
    Seo SB; Lee HY; Zhang AH; Kim HY; Shin DH; Lee SD
    Int J Legal Med; 2012 Nov; 126(6):961-8. PubMed ID: 21912926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of DNA yield and STR success rates from different tissues in embalmed bodies.
    Wheeler A; Czado N; Gangitano D; Turnbough M; Hughes-Stamm S
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jan; 131(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 27338932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of InnoQuant™, a sensitive human DNA quantitation and degradation assessment method for forensic samples using high copy number mobile elements Alu and SVA.
    Pineda GM; Montgomery AH; Thompson R; Indest B; Carroll M; Sinha SK
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():224-35. PubMed ID: 25212510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of reduced-scale reactions for the Quantifiler Human DNA kit.
    Westring CG; Kristinsson R; Gilbert DM; Danielson PB
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Sep; 52(5):1035-43. PubMed ID: 17681000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative and qualitative study of STR DNA from ethanol and formalin fixed tissues.
    Alqaydi M; Roy R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():18-29. PubMed ID: 26963697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DNA quality and quantity from up to 16 years old post-mortem blood stored on FTA cards.
    Rahikainen AL; Palo JU; de Leeuw W; Budowle B; Sajantila A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Apr; 261():148-53. PubMed ID: 26937857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.