These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37440174)

  • 1. Assessing Patterns in Childhood Obesity Patient Education: A Quality of Online Health Information and Google Trends Analysis.
    Brody PA; Mehra M; Horinek M; Herzstein SM; Chan J
    Child Obes; 2024 May; 20(4):289-299. PubMed ID: 37440174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.
    Martin A; Stewart JR; Gaskins J; Medlin E
    J Cancer Educ; 2019 Jun; 34(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 29353371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the Quality, Readability, and Activity of Online Information on Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.
    Mehra M; Brody PA; Kollapaneni SS; Sakhalkar O; Rahimi S
    Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45984. PubMed ID: 37900528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.
    Elhusseiny AM; Hassan AK; Hassan MA; Eleiwa TK; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Chauhan MZ; Shaikh O; Khouri AS; Sallam AB
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 38112390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Quality and Readability of Online Patient Information on Positional Head Shape Conditions.
    Gutowski KS; Applebaum SA; Thomae BL; Knight KC; Chwa ES; Gosain AK
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2024 Jul; 61(7):1186-1194. PubMed ID: 36850070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
    Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
    O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the readability of online information about jones fracture.
    Al-Kharouf KFK; Khan FI; Robertson GA
    World J Methodol; 2023 Dec; 13(5):439-445. PubMed ID: 38229937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the readability and quality of online information about benign prostatic hyperplasia.
    Hotz T; Zhou MT; Reissmann ME; Apoj M; Wason SEL; Wang DS
    World J Urol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):257-262. PubMed ID: 36416925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
    Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability of websites containing information on dental implants.
    Jayaratne YS; Anderson NK; Zwahlen RA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1319-24. PubMed ID: 24148074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
    Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
    Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
    Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The readability and reliability of online information about adenoidectomy.
    Ahmadi O; Wood AJ
    J Laryngol Otol; 2021 Nov; 135(11):976-980. PubMed ID: 34392845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet.
    Priyanka P; Hadi YB; Reynolds GJ
    Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():2849390. PubMed ID: 30510923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Will the Effect of New Federal Breast Density Legislation Be Diminished by Currently Available Online Patient Educational Materials?
    Miles RC; Choi P; Baird GL; Dibble EH; Lamb L; Garg M; Lehman C
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Oct; 27(10):1400-1405. PubMed ID: 31839567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
    Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability.
    Wiriyakijja P; Fedele S; Porter S; Ni Riordain R
    J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Sep; 45(8):617-20. PubMed ID: 27233229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability and Understandability Analysis of Online Materials Related to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.
    Scott BB; Johnson AR; Doval AF; Tran BN; Lee BT
    Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2020 Feb; 54(2):111-117. PubMed ID: 31607232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.