These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37441561)

  • 1. Using Artificial Intelligence to Quantify Sexual Dimorphism in Aesthetic Faces: Analysis of 100 Facial Points in 42 Caucasian Celebrities.
    Liu AS; Salinas CA; Sharaf BA
    Aesthet Surg J Open Forum; 2023; 5():ojad046. PubMed ID: 37441561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facial Morphometrics in Black Celebrities: Contemporary Facial Analysis Using an Artificial Intelligence Platform.
    Salinas CA; Liu A; Sharaf BA
    J Clin Med; 2023 Jul; 12(13):. PubMed ID: 37445534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of Hairline and Forehead Sexual Dimorphic Aesthetics in 60 Celebrities Using Artificial Intelligence.
    Salinas CA; Liu A; Sharaf BA
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2023 Jul; 11(7):e5107. PubMed ID: 37427151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphological quantitative criteria and aesthetic evaluation of eight female Han face types.
    Zhao Q; Zhou R; Zhang X; Sun H; Lu X; Xia D; Song M; Liang Y
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 37(2):445-53. PubMed ID: 23404449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correction to: Using Artificial Intelligence to Quantify Sexual Dimorphism in Aesthetic Faces: Analysis of 100 Facial Points in 42 Caucasian Celebrities.
    Aesthet Surg J Open Forum; 2023; 5():ojad097. PubMed ID: 37946871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of aging and body characteristics on facial sexual dimorphism in the Caucasian Population.
    Skomina Z; Verdenik M; Hren NI
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0231983. PubMed ID: 32407322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attractive Versus Golden Ratios: Formula of Utopian Beauty through Comparison of Facial Proportions among Worldwide Celebrities and Average People.
    Yalcinkaya E; Kocaman SA; Yuksekkaya M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 33(7):1950-1955. PubMed ID: 35119402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Photographic Facial Soft Tissue Analysis by Means of Linear and Angular Measurements in an Adolescent Persian Population.
    Moshkelgosha V; Fathinejad S; Pakizeh Z; Shamsa M; Golkari A
    Open Dent J; 2015; 9():346-56. PubMed ID: 26464606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do the Most Attractive Faces of Patients With Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Differ From Those With the Least Attractive Faces in Terms of Angular and Proportional Measurements Assessed on Frontal and Lateral Photographs?
    Mortada AA; Burhan AS; Hajeer MY; Nawaya FR; Sahtout GF
    Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e33455. PubMed ID: 36628400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ideal proportions in full face front view, contemporary versus antique.
    Mommaerts MY; Moerenhout BA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 39(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 20542444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of facial golden proportions among central Indian population.
    Saurabh R; Piyush B; Sourabh B; Preeti O; Trivedi R; Vishnoi P
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016 Dec; 6(Suppl 3):S182-S186. PubMed ID: 28217534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Was facial width-to-height ratio subject to sexual selection pressures? A life course approach.
    Hodges-Simeon CR; Albert G; Richardson GB; McHale TS; Weinberg SM; Gurven M; Gaulin SJC
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0240284. PubMed ID: 33711068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biometric study of eyelid shape and dimensions of different races with references to beauty.
    Rhee SC; Woo KS; Kwon B
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 36(5):1236-45. PubMed ID: 22810555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-Dimensional Anthropometric Evaluation of Facial Morphology.
    Celebi AA; Kau CH; Ozaydin B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 28(5):e470-e474. PubMed ID: 28665846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Photogrammetric analysis of palpebral fissure dimensions and its position in malaysian South Indian ethnic adults by gender.
    Packiriswamy V; Kumar P; Rao KG
    N Am J Med Sci; 2012 Oct; 4(10):458-62. PubMed ID: 23112966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of facial and smile esthetics.
    Koidou VP; Chatzopoulos GS; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):270-277. PubMed ID: 28552284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photogrammetric Analysis of Eyebrow and Eyelid Dimensions in Indian American Adults.
    Sadacharan CM; Packirisamy V
    J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(8):e796-e800. PubMed ID: 33136915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of Target Sex, Sexual Dimorphism, and Facial Attractiveness on Perceptions of Target Attractiveness and Trustworthiness.
    Hu Y; Abbasi NUH; Zhang Y; Chen H
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():942. PubMed ID: 29937750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.
    Talbert L; Kau CH; Christou T; Vlachos C; Souccar N
    J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 24671286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.