153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37442226)
21. The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi.
Obek C; Onal B; Kantay K; Kalkan M; Yalçin V; Oner A; Solok V; Tansu N
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2081-4; discussion 2085. PubMed ID: 11696710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Predictors of lower pole renal stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Sumino Y; Mimata H; Tasaki Y; Ohno H; Hoshino T; Nomura T; Nomura Y
J Urol; 2002 Oct; 168(4 Pt 1):1344-7. PubMed ID: 12352389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of intracalyceal distribution on the clearance of renal stones of > or = 20 mm in children after extracorporeal lithotripsy.
Ather MH; Noor MA; Akhtar S
BJU Int; 2004 Apr; 93(6):827-9. PubMed ID: 15049998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative study of long-term stone recurrence after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and open stone surgery for kidney stones.
Koşar A; Sarica K; Aydos K; Küpeli S; Türkölmez K; Göğüs O
Int J Urol; 1999 Mar; 6(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 10226822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Investigating ESWL success rate in the treatment of renal and ureteral stones in children.
Soleimani MJ; Shahrokh H; Soraki VV; Fakhar V; Ghaed MA; Narouie B
Urologia; 2023 Aug; 90(3):570-575. PubMed ID: 36932948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prognostic factors of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of renal stones.
Al-Ansari A; As-Sadiq K; Al-Said S; Younis N; Jaleel OA; Shokeir AA
Int Urol Nephrol; 2006; 38(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 16502054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy.
Gupta NP; Singh DV; Hemal AK; Mandal S
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 10604306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Treatment efficacy and outcomes using a third generation shockwave lithotripter.
Neisius A; Wöllner J; Thomas C; Roos FC; Brenner W; Hampel C; Preminger GM; Thüroff JW; Gillitzer R
BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112(7):972-81. PubMed ID: 24118958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Clinical application of Sonolith 3000 type on extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal and ureteral stones].
Oka T; Hara T; Miyake O; Kobayashi Y; Yasunaga Y; Matsumiya K; Takaha M
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Oct; 36(10):1203-11. PubMed ID: 2264549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as surgical therapy in the kidney-ureter calculosis].
Grisotto M; Larcher P; Apicella F; Strada G; Rocco F
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2003 Sep; 75(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 14661393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Predictors of success after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for renal calculi between 20-30 mm: a multivariate analysis model.
El-Assmy A; El-Nahas AR; Abo-Elghar ME; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; Sheir KZ
ScientificWorldJournal; 2006 Mar; 6():2388-95. PubMed ID: 17619706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Can we successfully predict the outcome for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for medium size renal stones? A single-center experience.
Elawady H; Mahmoud MA; Samir M
Urologia; 2022 May; 89(2):235-239. PubMed ID: 33985373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Lithotripsy in the treatment of urinary lithiasis.
Tombolini P; Ruoppolo M; Bellorofonte C; Zaatar C; Follini M
J Nephrol; 2000; 13 Suppl 3():S71-82. PubMed ID: 11132037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Removal of staghorn calculi from the urinary tract with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourologic treatment methods].
Zogović J; Mladenović Lj
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1996; 124(11-12):323-7. PubMed ID: 9132970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
Srisubat A; Potisat S; Lojanapiwat B; Setthawong V; Laopaiboon M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD007044. PubMed ID: 19821393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.
Onal B; Demirkesen O; Tansu N; Kalkan M; Altintaş R; Yalçin V
J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 15311043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Analysis of the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculia].
Shao ZQ; Liu CS; Qi H; Zheng SB
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2008 Dec; 28(12):2239-40. PubMed ID: 19114369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction?
Madbouly K; Sheir KZ; Elsobky E
J Urol; 2001 May; 165(5):1415-8. PubMed ID: 11342888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Caliceal stones:What did we learned after 10 years of ESWL (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy)].
Pricop C; Novac C; Negru I; Negru D; Tomac I
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2003; 107(1):157-62. PubMed ID: 14755988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
