BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37443110)

  • 1. The benefits and struggles of FAIR data: the case of reusing plant phenotyping data.
    Papoutsoglou EA; Athanasiadis IN; Visser RGF; Finkers R
    Sci Data; 2023 Jul; 10(1):457. PubMed ID: 37443110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enabling reusability of plant phenomic datasets with MIAPPE 1.1.
    Papoutsoglou EA; Faria D; Arend D; Arnaud E; Athanasiadis IN; Chaves I; Coppens F; Cornut G; Costa BV; Ćwiek-Kupczyńska H; Droesbeke B; Finkers R; Gruden K; Junker A; King GJ; Krajewski P; Lange M; Laporte MA; Michotey C; Oppermann M; Ostler R; Poorter H; Ramı Rez-Gonzalez R; Ramšak Ž; Reif JC; Rocca-Serra P; Sansone SA; Scholz U; Tardieu F; Uauy C; Usadel B; Visser RGF; Weise S; Kersey PJ; Miguel CM; Adam-Blondon AF; Pommier C
    New Phytol; 2020 Jul; 227(1):260-273. PubMed ID: 32171029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges for FAIR-compliant description and comparison of crop phenotype data with standardized controlled vocabularies.
    Andrés-Hernández L; Halimi RA; Mauleon R; Mayes S; Baten A; King GJ
    Database (Oxford); 2021 May; 2021():. PubMed ID: 33991093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PhenoApp: A mobile tool for plant phenotyping to record field and greenhouse observations.
    Röckel F; Schreiber T; Schüler D; Braun U; Krukenberg I; Schwander F; Peil A; Brandt C; Willner E; Gransow D; Scholz U; Kecke S; Maul E; Lange M; Töpfer R
    F1000Res; 2022; 11():12. PubMed ID: 36636476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applying FAIR Principles to Plant Phenotypic Data Management in GnpIS.
    Pommier C; Michotey C; Cornut G; Roumet P; Duchêne E; Flores R; Lebreton A; Alaux M; Durand S; Kimmel E; Letellier T; Merceron G; Laine M; Guerche C; Loaec M; Steinbach D; Laporte MA; Arnaud E; Quesneville H; Adam-Blondon AF
    Plant Phenomics; 2019; 2019():1671403. PubMed ID: 33313522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phenotyping: New Windows into the Plant for Breeders.
    Watt M; Fiorani F; Usadel B; Rascher U; Muller O; Schurr U
    Annu Rev Plant Biol; 2020 Apr; 71():689-712. PubMed ID: 32097567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Future scenarios for plant phenotyping.
    Fiorani F; Schurr U
    Annu Rev Plant Biol; 2013; 64():267-91. PubMed ID: 23451789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modelling strategies for assessing and increasing the effectiveness of new phenotyping techniques in plant breeding.
    van Eeuwijk FA; Bustos-Korts D; Millet EJ; Boer MP; Kruijer W; Thompson A; Malosetti M; Iwata H; Quiroz R; Kuppe C; Muller O; Blazakis KN; Yu K; Tardieu F; Chapman SC
    Plant Sci; 2019 May; 282():23-39. PubMed ID: 31003609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computational aspects underlying genome to phenome analysis in plants.
    Bolger AM; Poorter H; Dumschott K; Bolger ME; Arend D; Osorio S; Gundlach H; Mayer KFX; Lange M; Scholz U; Usadel B
    Plant J; 2019 Jan; 97(1):182-198. PubMed ID: 30500991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Plant phenomics and the need for physiological phenotyping across scales to narrow the genotype-to-phenotype knowledge gap.
    Großkinsky DK; Svensgaard J; Christensen S; Roitsch T
    J Exp Bot; 2015 Sep; 66(18):5429-40. PubMed ID: 26163702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maize Genomes to Fields: 2014 and 2015 field season genotype, phenotype, environment, and inbred ear image datasets.
    AlKhalifah N; Campbell DA; Falcon CM; Gardiner JM; Miller ND; Romay MC; Walls R; Walton R; Yeh CT; Bohn M; Bubert J; Buckler ES; Ciampitti I; Flint-Garcia S; Gore MA; Graham C; Hirsch C; Holland JB; Hooker D; Kaeppler S; Knoll J; Lauter N; Lee EC; Lorenz A; Lynch JP; Moose SP; Murray SC; Nelson R; Rocheford T; Rodriguez O; Schnable JC; Scully B; Smith M; Springer N; Thomison P; Tuinstra M; Wisser RJ; Xu W; Ertl D; Schnable PS; De Leon N; Spalding EP; Edwards J; Lawrence-Dill CJ
    BMC Res Notes; 2018 Jul; 11(1):452. PubMed ID: 29986751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measures for interoperability of phenotypic data: minimum information requirements and formatting.
    Ćwiek-Kupczyńska H; Altmann T; Arend D; Arnaud E; Chen D; Cornut G; Fiorani F; Frohmberg W; Junker A; Klukas C; Lange M; Mazurek C; Nafissi A; Neveu P; van Oeveren J; Pommier C; Poorter H; Rocca-Serra P; Sansone SA; Scholz U; van Schriek M; Seren Ü; Usadel B; Weise S; Kersey P; Krajewski P
    Plant Methods; 2016; 12():44. PubMed ID: 27843484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Plant Genotype to Phenotype Prediction Using Machine Learning.
    Danilevicz MF; Gill M; Anderson R; Batley J; Bennamoun M; Bayer PE; Edwards D
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():822173. PubMed ID: 35664329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crop management impacts the efficiency of quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection and use: case study of fruit load×QTL interactions.
    Kromdijk J; Bertin N; Heuvelink E; Molenaar J; de Visser PH; Marcelis LF; Struik PC
    J Exp Bot; 2014 Jan; 65(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 24227339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genotype and phenotype data standardization, utilization and integration in the big data era for agricultural sciences.
    Deng CH; Naithani S; Kumari S; Cobo-Simón I; Quezada-Rodríguez EH; Skrabisova M; Gladman N; Correll MJ; Sikiru AB; Afuwape OO; Marrano A; Rebollo I; Zhang W; Jung S
    Database (Oxford); 2023 Dec; 2023():. PubMed ID: 38079567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Methods of high-throughput plant phenotyping for large-scale breeding and genetic experiments].
    Afonnikov DA; Genaev MA; Doroshkov AV; Komyshev EG; Pshenichnikova TA
    Genetika; 2016 Jul; 52(7):788-803. PubMed ID: 29368867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A data reusability assessment in the nanosafety domain based on the NSDRA framework followed by an exploratory quantitative structure activity relationships (QSAR) modeling targeting cellular viability.
    Furxhi I; Willighagen E; Evelo C; Costa A; Gardini D; Ammar A
    NanoImpact; 2023 Jul; 31():100475. PubMed ID: 37423508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maize genomes to fields (G2F): 2014-2017 field seasons: genotype, phenotype, climatic, soil, and inbred ear image datasets.
    McFarland BA; AlKhalifah N; Bohn M; Bubert J; Buckler ES; Ciampitti I; Edwards J; Ertl D; Gage JL; Falcon CM; Flint-Garcia S; Gore MA; Graham C; Hirsch CN; Holland JB; Hood E; Hooker D; Jarquin D; Kaeppler SM; Knoll J; Kruger G; Lauter N; Lee EC; Lima DC; Lorenz A; Lynch JP; McKay J; Miller ND; Moose SP; Murray SC; Nelson R; Poudyal C; Rocheford T; Rodriguez O; Romay MC; Schnable JC; Schnable PS; Scully B; Sekhon R; Silverstein K; Singh M; Smith M; Spalding EP; Springer N; Thelen K; Thomison P; Tuinstra M; Wallace J; Walls R; Wills D; Wisser RJ; Xu W; Yeh CT; de Leon N
    BMC Res Notes; 2020 Feb; 13(1):71. PubMed ID: 32051026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Opportunity and challenges of phenotyping plant salt tolerance.
    Hu Y; Schmidhalter U
    Trends Plant Sci; 2023 May; 28(5):552-566. PubMed ID: 36628656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Programmatic Access to FAIRified Digital Plant Genetic Resources.
    Ghaffar M; Schüler D; König P; Arend D; Junker A; Scholz U; Lange M
    J Integr Bioinform; 2020 Jan; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 31913851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.