These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37443919)

  • 1. Effects of Jumping Phase, Leading Limb, and Arena Surface Type on Forelimb Hoof Movement.
    Rohlf CM; Garcia TC; Marsh LJ; Acutt EV; le Jeune SS; Stover SM
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Jun; 13(13):. PubMed ID: 37443919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kinematic characteristics of hoof landing in jumping horses at elite level.
    Hernlund E; Egenvall A; Roepstorff L
    Equine Vet J Suppl; 2010 Nov; (38):462-7. PubMed ID: 21059046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hoof accelerations at hoof-surface impact for stride types and functional limb types relevant to show jumping horses.
    Hernlund E; Egenvall A; Peterson ML; Mahaffey CA; Roepstorff L
    Vet J; 2013 Dec; 198 Suppl 1():e27-32. PubMed ID: 24511635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative kinematic analysis of the leading and trailing forelimbs of horses cantering on a turf and a synthetic surface.
    Crevier-Denoix N; Falala S; Holden-Douilly L; Camus M; Martino J; Ravary-Plumioen B; Vergari C; Desquilbet L; Denoix JM; Chateau H; Pourcelot P
    Equine Vet J Suppl; 2013 Dec; (45):54-61. PubMed ID: 24304405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationships between fore- and hindlimb ground reaction force and hoof deceleration patterns in trotting horses.
    Gustås P; Johnston C; Roepstorff L; Drevemo S; Lanshammar H
    Equine Vet J; 2004 Dec; 36(8):737-42. PubMed ID: 15656507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shear ground reaction force variation among equine arena surfaces.
    Rohlf CM; Garcia TC; Fyhrie DP; le Jeune SS; Peterson ML; Stover SM
    Vet J; 2023 Jan; 291():105930. PubMed ID: 36427603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time domain characteristics of hoof-ground interaction at the onset of stance phase.
    Burn JF
    Equine Vet J; 2006 Nov; 38(7):657-63. PubMed ID: 17228582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distal hindlimb kinematics of galloping Thoroughbred racehorses on dirt and synthetic racetrack surfaces.
    Symons JE; Garcia TC; Stover SM
    Equine Vet J; 2014 Mar; 46(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 23742040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High speed field kinematics of foot contact in elite galloping horses in training.
    Parsons KJ; Spence AJ; Morgan R; Thompson JA; Wilson AM
    Equine Vet J; 2011 Mar; 43(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 21592218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrimination of two equine racing surfaces based on forelimb dynamic and hoof kinematic variables at the canter.
    Crevier-Denoix N; Pourcelot P; Holden-Douilly L; Camus M; Falala S; Ravary-Plumioën B; Vergari C; Desquilbet L; Chateau H
    Vet J; 2013 Dec; 198 Suppl 1():e124-9. PubMed ID: 24360756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kinematic differences between the distal portions of the forelimbs and hind limbs of horses at the trot.
    Back W; Schamhardt HC; Hartman W; Barneveld A
    Am J Vet Res; 1995 Nov; 56(11):1522-8. PubMed ID: 8585667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kinematics of the distal hindlimb during stance phase in the fast trotting standardbred.
    Johnston C; Roepstorff L; Drevemo S; Kallings P
    Equine Vet J; 1996 Jul; 28(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 8818591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hoof accelerations and ground reaction forces of Thoroughbred racehorses measured on dirt, synthetic, and turf track surfaces.
    Setterbo JJ; Garcia TC; Campbell IP; Reese JL; Morgan JM; Kim SY; Hubbard M; Stover SM
    Am J Vet Res; 2009 Oct; 70(10):1220-9. PubMed ID: 19795936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arena surface vertical impact forces vary with surface compaction.
    Rohlf CM; Garcia TC; Fyhrie DP; le Jeune SS; Peterson ML; Stover SM
    Vet J; 2023 Mar; 293():105955. PubMed ID: 36781018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of two preparation procedures on an equine arena surface in relation to motion of the hoof and metacarpophalangeal joint.
    Northrop AJ; Dagg LA; Martin JH; Brigden CV; Owen AG; Blundell EL; Peterson ML; Hobbs SJ
    Vet J; 2013 Dec; 198 Suppl 1():e137-42. PubMed ID: 24360758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of subject velocity on ground reaction force measurements and stance times in clinically normal horses at the walk and trot.
    McLaughlin RM; Gaughan EM; Roush JK; Skaggs CL
    Am J Vet Res; 1996 Jan; 57(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 8720231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of shoeing on kinetics and kinematics during the stance phase.
    Roepstorff L; Johnston C; Drevemo S
    Equine Vet J Suppl; 1999 Jul; (30):279-85. PubMed ID: 10659269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional differentiation of trailing and leading forelimbs during locomotion on the ground and on a horizontal branch in the European red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris, Rodentia).
    Schmidt A
    Zoology (Jena); 2011 Jun; 114(3):155-64. PubMed ID: 21658923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limb dynamics in agility jumps of beginner and advanced dogs.
    Söhnel K; Rode C; de Lussanet MHE; Wagner H; Fischer MS; Andrada E
    J Exp Biol; 2020 Apr; 223(Pt 7):. PubMed ID: 32098886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of hoof deformation using optical motion capture.
    Burn JF; Brockington C
    Equine Vet J Suppl; 2001 Apr; (33):50-3. PubMed ID: 11721568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.