These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37447989)

  • 1. A Review of the Motion Planning and Control Methods for Automated Vehicles.
    Song X; Gao H; Ding T; Gu Y; Liu J; Tian K
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jul; 23(13):. PubMed ID: 37447989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A co-evolutionary lane-changing trajectory planning method for automated vehicles based on the instantaneous risk identification.
    Wu J; Chen X; Bie Y; Zhou W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106907. PubMed ID: 36455450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational Efficient Motion Planning Method for Automated Vehicles Considering Dynamic Obstacle Avoidance and Traffic Interaction.
    Zhang Y; Wang J; Lv J; Gao B; Chu H; Na X
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 36236495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research on the Comfort of Vehicle Passengers Considering the Vehicle Motion State and Passenger Physiological Characteristics: Improving the Passenger Comfort of Autonomous Vehicles.
    Wang C; Zhao X; Fu R; Li Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(18):. PubMed ID: 32962050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Support systems for cyclists in automated traffic: A review and future outlook.
    Berge SH; de Winter J; Hagenzieker M
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Sep; 111():104043. PubMed ID: 37156127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mitigating motion sickness in automated vehicles with vibration cue system.
    Li D; Chen L
    Ergonomics; 2022 Oct; 65(10):1313-1325. PubMed ID: 35020579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Study on Dynamic Motion Planning for Autonomous Vehicles Based on Nonlinear Vehicle Model.
    Tang X; Li B; Du H
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 36617040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Game Algorithm of Intelligent Driving Vehicle Based on Left-Turn Scene of Crossroad Traffic Flow.
    Guo Z; Sun D; Zhou L
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():9318475. PubMed ID: 36120691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is vehicle automation enough to prevent crashes? Role of traffic operations in automated driving environments for traffic safety.
    Jeong E; Oh C; Lee S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():115-124. PubMed ID: 28499140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research on the Behavioral Dynamics Motion Planning Method of the Human-Vehicle Social Force Model.
    Han G; Wu Z; Zhang W; Wang W
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():3154532. PubMed ID: 36337268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research on obstacle avoidance optimization and path planning of autonomous vehicles based on attention mechanism combined with multimodal information decision-making thoughts of robots.
    Wu X; Wang G; Shen N
    Front Neurorobot; 2023; 17():1269447. PubMed ID: 37811356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact analysis of cooperative perception on the performance of automated driving in unsignalized roundabouts.
    Zainudin H; Koufos K; Lee G; Jiang L; Dianati M
    Front Robot AI; 2023; 10():1164950. PubMed ID: 37649809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Apollo: Adaptive Polar Lattice-Based Local Obstacle Avoidance and Motion Planning for Automated Vehicles.
    Li Y; Chen Z; Wang T; Zeng X; Yin Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Active Obstacle Avoidance Trajectory Planning for Vehicles Based on Obstacle Potential Field and MPC in V2P Scenario.
    Pan R; Jie L; Zhao X; Wang H; Yang J; Song J
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application improvement of A* algorithm in intelligent vehicle trajectory planning.
    Xiong X; Min H; Yu Y; Wang P
    Math Biosci Eng; 2020 Nov; 18(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 33525078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standards for passenger comfort in automated vehicles: Acceleration and jerk.
    de Winkel KN; Irmak T; Happee R; Shyrokau B
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Jan; 106():103881. PubMed ID: 36058166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives.
    Papaioannou G; Htike Z; Lin C; Siampis E; Longo S; Velenis E
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(14):. PubMed ID: 35890856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Path Planning and Trajectory Tracking for Automatic Guided Vehicles.
    Tang Y; Zhou J; Hao H; Hao F; Xu H
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():8981778. PubMed ID: 35875763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motion planning for autonomous vehicle based on radial basis function neural network in unstructured environment.
    Chen J; Zhao P; Liang H; Mei T
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 Sep; 14(9):17548-66. PubMed ID: 25237902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stability and safety evaluation of mixed traffic flow with connected automated vehicles on expressways.
    Yao Z; Hu R; Jiang Y; Xu T
    J Safety Res; 2020 Dec; 75():262-274. PubMed ID: 33334485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.