270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37448716)
1. Head movement and its relation to hearing.
Higgins NC; Pupo DA; Ozmeral EJ; Eddins DA
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1183303. PubMed ID: 37448716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Compact Two-Loudspeaker Virtual Sound Reproduction System for Clinical Testing of Spatial Hearing With Hearing-Assistive Devices.
Hamdan EC; Fletcher MD
Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():725127. PubMed ID: 35153652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AVATAR Assesses Speech Understanding and Multitask Costs in Ecologically Relevant Listening Situations.
Devesse A; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):521-531. PubMed ID: 31356387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rerouting Hearing Aid Systems for Overcoming Simulated Unilateral Hearing in Dynamic Listening Situations.
Picou EM; Lewis D; Angley G; Tharpe AM
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):790-803. PubMed ID: 31584502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An internet survey of individuals with hearing loss regarding assistive listening devices.
Harkins J; Tucker P
Trends Amplif; 2007 Jun; 11(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 17494875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An objective measure for selecting microphone modes in OMNI/DIR hearing aid circuits.
Grant KW; Elhilali M; Shamma SA; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Summers V
Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 18595186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Common Sound Scenarios: A Context-Driven Categorization of Everyday Sound Environments for Application in Hearing-Device Research.
Wolters F; Smeds K; Schmidt E; Christensen EK; Norup C
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jul; 27(7):527-40. PubMed ID: 27406660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Candidacy and management of assistive listening devices: special needs of the elderly.
Lesner SA
Int J Audiol; 2003 Jul; 42 Suppl 2():2S68-76. PubMed ID: 12918632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reaching to sounds in virtual reality: A multisensory-motor approach to promote adaptation to altered auditory cues.
Valzolgher C; Verdelet G; Salemme R; Lombardi L; Gaveau V; Farné A; Pavani F
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Dec; 149():107665. PubMed ID: 33130161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in head position as a measure of auditory localization performance: auditory psychomotor coordination under monaural and binaural listening conditions.
Perrott DR; Ambarsoom H; Tucker J
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Nov; 82(5):1637-45. PubMed ID: 3693705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a "direct-comparison" approach to automatic switching in omnidirectional/directional hearing aids.
Summers V; Grant KW; Walden BE; Cord MT; Surr RK; Elhilali M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Oct; 19(9):708-20. PubMed ID: 19418710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids in adults with hearing loss.
Maidment DW; Barker AB; Xia J; Ferguson MA
Int J Audiol; 2018 Oct; 57(10):721-729. PubMed ID: 30388942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of listening devices to ameliorate auditory deficit in children with autism.
Rance G; Saunders K; Carew P; Johansson M; Tan J
J Pediatr; 2014 Feb; 164(2):352-7. PubMed ID: 24183205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adapting Hearing Devices to the Individual Ear Acoustics: Database and Target Response Correction Functions for Various Device Styles.
Denk F; Ernst SMA; Ewert SD; Kollmeier B
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518779313. PubMed ID: 29877161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comparison of Personal Sound Amplification Products and Hearing Aids in Ecologically Relevant Test Environments.
Brody L; Wu YH; Stangl E
Am J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):581-593. PubMed ID: 30458521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Objective and perceptual comparisons of two bluetooth hearing aid assistive devices.
Clark JL; Pustejovsky C; Vanneste S
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Aug; 12(6):614-617. PubMed ID: 27377435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
