187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37449446)
1. Preferred left ventricular lead position for upgrade from right ventricular pacing to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Ogano M; Iwasaki YK; Okada T; Tanabe J; Shimizu W; Asai K
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Sep; 34(9):1925-1932. PubMed ID: 37449446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acute biventricular hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in right bundle branch block.
Houston BA; Sturdivant JL; Yu Y; Gold MR
Heart Rhythm; 2018 Oct; 15(10):1525-1532. PubMed ID: 29800750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Usefulness of the 12-lead electrocardiogram in the follow-up of patients with cardiac resynchronization devices. Part I.
Barold SS; Herweg B
Cardiol J; 2011; 18(5):476-86. PubMed ID: 21947982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Different regions of latest electrical activation during left bundle-branch block and right ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients determined by coronary venous electro-anatomic mapping.
Mafi Rad M; Blaauw Y; Dinh T; Pison L; Crijns HJ; Prinzen FW; Vernooy K
Eur J Heart Fail; 2014 Nov; 16(11):1214-22. PubMed ID: 25315161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The right ventricular septum presents the optimum site for maximal electrical separation during left ventricular pacing.
Miranda RI; Nault M; Simpson CS; Michael KA; Abdollah H; Baranchuk A; Redfearn DP
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Apr; 23(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 22049976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site.
Zanon F; Baracca E; Pastore G; Marcantoni L; Fraccaro C; Lanza D; Picariello C; Aggio S; Roncon L; Dell'Avvocata F; Rigatelli G; Pacetta D; Noventa F; Prinzen FW
Heart Rhythm; 2015 May; 12(5):975-81. PubMed ID: 25625721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Body surface mapping using an ECG belt to characterize electrical heterogeneity for different left ventricular pacing sites during cardiac resynchronization: Relationship with acute hemodynamic improvement.
Johnson WB; Vatterott PJ; Peterson MA; Bagwe S; Underwood RD; Bank AJ; Gage RM; Ramza B; Foreman BW; Splett V; Haddad T; Gillberg JM; Ghosh S
Heart Rhythm; 2017 Mar; 14(3):385-391. PubMed ID: 27871987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tailoring device settings in cardiac resynchronization therapy using electrograms from pacing electrodes.
Engels EB; Mafi-Rad M; Hermans BJM; Aranda A; van Stipdonk AMW; Rienstra M; Scheerder COS; Maass AH; Prinzen FW; Vernooy K
Europace; 2018 Jul; 20(7):1146-1153. PubMed ID: 29106563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The paced electrocardiogram cannot be used to identify left and right ventricular pacing sites in cardiac resynchronization therapy: validation by cardiac computed tomography.
Sommer A; Kronborg MB; Witt CT; Nørgaard BL; Nielsen JC
Europace; 2015 Mar; 17(3):432-8. PubMed ID: 25480941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determinants of the time-to-peak left ventricular dP/dt (Td) and QRS duration with different fusion strategies in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Odland HH; Holm T; Cornelussen R; Kongsgård E
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():979581. PubMed ID: 36186985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of the right ventricular pacing site for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) guided by electroanatomical mapping (CARTO).
Kiuchi K; Yoshida A; Fukuzawa K; Takano T; Kanda G; Takami K; Hirata K
Circ J; 2007 Oct; 71(10):1599-605. PubMed ID: 17895558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simultaneous His Bundle and Left Ventricular Pacing for Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivery: Acute Hemodynamic Assessment by Pressure-Volume Loops.
Padeletti L; Pieragnoli P; Ricciardi G; Innocenti L; Checchi L; Padeletti M; Michelucci A; Picariello F; Valsecchi S
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2016 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 27162032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-Term Hemodynamic and Electrophysiological Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization by Left Ventricular Septal Pacing.
Salden FCWM; Luermans JGLM; Westra SW; Weijs B; Engels EB; Heckman LIB; Lamerichs LJM; Janssen MHG; Clerx KJH; Cornelussen R; Ghosh S; Prinzen FW; Vernooy K
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 75(4):347-359. PubMed ID: 32000945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of QRS duration and pacing location on pressure-volume loop evaluation of cardiac resynchronization therapy in end-stage heart failure.
de Roest GJ; Allaart CP; de Haan S; Hendriks ML; Bronzwaer JG; van Rossum AC; de Cock CC
Am J Cardiol; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1581-8. PubMed ID: 21890082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-invasive three-dimensional electrical activation mapping to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response: site of latest left ventricular activation relative to pacing site.
Parreira L; Tsyganov A; Artyukhina E; Vernooy K; Tondo C; Adragao P; Ascione C; Carmo P; Carvalho S; Egger M; Ferreira A; Ghossein M; Holm M; Kalinin V; Malakhova M; Meine M; Nunes S; Podolyak D; Revishvili A; Shapieva A; Stepanova V; van Stipdonk A; Taymasova I; Wouters P; Zubarev S; Leyva F; Auricchio A; Varma N
Europace; 2023 Apr; 25(4):1458-1466. PubMed ID: 36857597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative electromechanical and hemodynamic effects of left ventricular and biventricular pacing in dyssynchronous heart failure: electrical resynchronization versus left-right ventricular interaction.
Lumens J; Ploux S; Strik M; Gorcsan J; Cochet H; Derval N; Strom M; Ramanathan C; Ritter P; Haïssaguerre M; Jaïs P; Arts T; Delhaas T; Prinzen FW; Bordachar P
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 62(25):2395-2403. PubMed ID: 24013057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Site-specific differences in latency intervals during biventricular pacing: impact on paced QRS morphology and echo-optimized V-V interval.
Herweg B; Ali R; Ilercil A; Madramootoo C; Cutro R; Weston MW; Barold SS
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 Nov; 33(11):1382-91. PubMed ID: 20735713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longer right to left ventricular activation delay at cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation is associated with improved clinical outcome in left bundle branch block patients.
Kosztin A; Kutyifa V; Nagy VK; Geller L; Zima E; Molnar L; Szilagyi S; Ozcan EE; Szeplaki G; Merkely B
Europace; 2016 Apr; 18(4):550-9. PubMed ID: 26116830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Right ventricular septal pacing as alternative for failed left ventricular lead implantation in cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates.
Alhous MH; Small GR; Hannah A; Hillis GS; Frenneaux M; Broadhurst PA
Europace; 2015 Jan; 17(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 25359384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New insights from a computational model on the relation between pacing site and CRT response.
Pluijmert M; Bovendeerd PH; Lumens J; Vernooy K; Prinzen FW; Delhaas T
Europace; 2016 Dec; 18(suppl 4):iv94-iv103. PubMed ID: 28011836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
