These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37450482)

  • 21. Performance and Analysis of the Alchemical Transfer Method for Binding-Free-Energy Predictions of Diverse Ligands.
    Chen L; Wu Y; Wu C; Silveira A; Sherman W; Xu H; Gallicchio E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Jan; 64(1):250-264. PubMed ID: 38147877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Expanded Ensemble Methods Can be Used to Accurately Predict Protein-Ligand Relative Binding Free Energies.
    Zhang S; Hahn DF; Shirts MR; Voelz VA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Oct; 17(10):6536-6547. PubMed ID: 34516130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Enhanced Sampling of Buried Charges in Free Energy Calculations Using Replica Exchange with Charge Tempering.
    Liu X; Brooks Iii CL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Feb; 20(3):1051-1061. PubMed ID: 38232295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rapid alchemical free energy calculation employing a generalized born implicit solvent model.
    Ostermeir K; Zacharias M
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jan; 119(3):968-75. PubMed ID: 25160060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Alchemical determination of drug-receptor binding free energy: Where we stand and where we could move to.
    Procacci P
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Jan; 71():233-241. PubMed ID: 27984798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. ChemFlow─From 2D Chemical Libraries to Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energies.
    Barreto Gomes DE; Galentino K; Sisquellas M; Monari L; Bouysset C; Cecchini M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Jan; 63(2):407-411. PubMed ID: 36603846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Addressing Suboptimal Poses in Nonequilibrium Alchemical Calculations.
    Karrenbrock M; Rizzi V; Procacci P; Gervasio FL
    J Phys Chem B; 2024 Feb; 128(7):1595-1605. PubMed ID: 38323915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exploring the Effectiveness of Binding Free Energy Calculations.
    Mondal D; Florian J; Warshel A
    J Phys Chem B; 2019 Oct; 123(42):8910-8915. PubMed ID: 31560539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.
    Cournia Z; Allen B; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2911-2937. PubMed ID: 29243483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. AMBER Drug Discovery Boost Tools: Automated Workflow for Production Free-Energy Simulation Setup and Analysis (ProFESSA).
    Ganguly A; Tsai HC; Fernández-Pendás M; Lee TS; Giese TJ; York DM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Dec; 62(23):6069-6083. PubMed ID: 36450130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Alchemical free energy simulations without speed limits. A generic framework to calculate free energy differences independent of the underlying molecular dynamics program.
    Wieder M; Fleck M; Braunsfeld B; Boresch S
    J Comput Chem; 2022 Jun; 43(17):1151-1160. PubMed ID: 35485139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Binding Modes of Ligands Using Enhanced Sampling (BLUES): Rapid Decorrelation of Ligand Binding Modes via Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo.
    Gill SC; Lim NM; Grinaway PB; Rustenburg AS; Fass J; Ross GA; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 May; 122(21):5579-5598. PubMed ID: 29486559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accelerating Alchemical Free Energy Prediction Using a Multistate Method: Application to Multiple Kinases.
    Champion C; Gall R; Ries B; Rieder SR; Barros EP; Riniker S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Nov; 63(22):7133-7147. PubMed ID: 37948537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Guidelines for the analysis of free energy calculations.
    Klimovich PV; Shirts MR; Mobley DL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 May; 29(5):397-411. PubMed ID: 25808134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy and Precision of Alchemical Relative Free Energy Predictions with and without Replica-Exchange.
    Wan S; Tresadern G; Pérez-Benito L; van Vlijmen H; Coveney PV
    Adv Theory Simul; 2020 Jan; 3(1):1900195. PubMed ID: 34527855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Alchemical Free Energy Calculations for Nucleotide Mutations in Protein-DNA Complexes.
    Gapsys V; de Groot BL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Dec; 13(12):6275-6289. PubMed ID: 29125747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Achieving Accurate Standard Protein-Protein Binding Free Energy Calculations through the Geometrical Route and Ergodic Sampling.
    Fu H; Chipot C; Shao X; Cai W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Apr; 63(8):2512-2519. PubMed ID: 37042771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A strategy for proline and glycine mutations to proteins with alchemical free energy calculations.
    Hayes RL; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2021 Jun; 42(15):1088-1094. PubMed ID: 33844328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reduced Free Energy Perturbation/Hamiltonian Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Method with Unbiased Alchemical Thermodynamic Axis.
    Jiang W; Thirman J; Jo S; Roux B
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 Oct; 122(41):9435-9442. PubMed ID: 30253098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Uni-GBSA: an open-source and web-based automatic workflow to perform MM/GB(PB)SA calculations for virtual screening.
    Yang M; Bo Z; Xu T; Xu B; Wang D; Zheng H
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Jul; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 37328705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.