These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37451825)

  • 21. Evaluating Pediatric Ophthalmic Care Using Sentiment Analysis of Physician Review Sites.
    Vought V; Vought R; Sharma R; Razdan G; Zhu L; Sutariya R; Wagner RS
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(3):211-218. PubMed ID: 38275203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Concierge care and patient reviews.
    Nemzer LR; Neymotin F
    Health Econ; 2020 Aug; 29(8):913-922. PubMed ID: 32515116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Data Accuracy and Predictors of High Ratings of Colon and Rectal Surgeons on an Online Physician Rating Website.
    Hill SS; Hoang CM; Cheraghi SN; Shabo MR; Resnick AJ; Crawford A; Melnitchouk N; Harnsberger CR; Alavi K; Sturrock PR; Maykel JA; Davids JS
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Feb; 63(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 31914115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. AI-Assisted Sentiment Analysis of ACFAS Fellowship-Trained Foot and Ankle Surgeon Online Reviews.
    Casciato DJ; Mateen S
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2024; 63(5):577-579. PubMed ID: 38879146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Understanding Gender Biases and Differences in Web-Based Reviews of Sanctioned Physicians Through a Machine Learning Approach: Mixed Methods Study.
    Barnett J; Bjarnadóttir MV; Anderson D; Chen C
    JMIR Form Res; 2022 Sep; 6(9):e34902. PubMed ID: 36074543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
    Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bifurcation of Patient Reviews: An Analysis of Trends in Online Ratings.
    Devgan LL; Klein EJ; Fox S; Ozturk T
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Apr; 8(4):e2781. PubMed ID: 32440443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sex, Age, and Patient Experience in Cardiologist Reviews: A Large-Scale Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Analysis.
    Yang A; Rodriguez F; Woo JP
    JACC Adv; 2024 Jul; 3(7):101046. PubMed ID: 39129993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An analysis of online evaluations on a physician rating website: evidence from a German public reporting instrument.
    Emmert M; Meier F
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e157. PubMed ID: 23919987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The development of online doctor reviews in China: an analysis of the largest online doctor review website in China.
    Hao H
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e134. PubMed ID: 26032933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Online Physician Reviews in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery: What Do Patients Really Want?
    Asanad K; Parameshwar PS; Houman J; Spiegel BM; Daskivich TJ; Anger JT
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(2):109-114. PubMed ID: 29474282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing patient satisfaction among ABHRS surgeons: Opportunities to improve.
    Hakimi AA; Yasmeh JP; Foulad DS
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Feb; 19(2):462-465. PubMed ID: 31134743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Dermatologist Ratings on Health Care-Specific and General Consumer Websites.
    Waqas B; Cooley V; Lipner SR
    Cutis; 2021 Apr; 107(4):182-184. PubMed ID: 34096845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Online reviews of 500 urologists.
    Ellimoottil C; Hart A; Greco K; Quek ML; Farooq A
    J Urol; 2013 Jun; 189(6):2269-73. PubMed ID: 23228385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Gender, Soft Skills, and Patient Experience in Online Physician Reviews: A Large-Scale Text Analysis.
    Dunivin Z; Zadunayski L; Baskota U; Siek K; Mankoff J
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e14455. PubMed ID: 32729844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Online Reputations: Comparing Hospital- and Patient-Generated Ratings in Academic Otolaryngology.
    Basa K; Jabbour N; Rohlfing M; Schmoker S; Lawlor CM; Levi J; Sobin L; Tracy JC; Tracy LF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2021 Dec; 130(12):1317-1325. PubMed ID: 33813874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How wait-times, social media, and surgeon demographics influence online reviews on leading review websites for joint replacement surgeons.
    Damodar D; Donnally CJ; McCormick JR; Li DJ; Ingrasci GV; Roche MW; Vakharia RM; Law TY; Hernandez VH
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2019; 10(4):761-767. PubMed ID: 31316251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Online Ratings of Facial Plastic Surgeons: Worthwhile Additions to Conventional Patient Experience Surveys.
    Bovenzi CD; Manges KA; Krein H; Heffelfinger R
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2021; 23(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 32716653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.
    Kadry B; Chu LF; Kadry B; Gammas D; Macario A
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Nov; 13(4):e95. PubMed ID: 22088924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.