137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37451899)
1. Marginal fit of monolithic versus layered zirconia crowns assessed with 2 marginal gap methods.
Fasih P; Tavakolizadeh S; Sedaghat Monfared M; Sofi-Mahmudi A; Yari A
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; 130(2):250.e1-250.e7. PubMed ID: 37451899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of cementation and aging on the marginal fit of veneered and monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns.
Del Piñal M; Lopez-Suarez C; Bartolome JF; Volpato CA; Suarez MJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):323.e1-323.e7. PubMed ID: 33176924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital assessment of marginal accuracy in ceramic crowns fabricated with different marginal finish line configurations.
Faruqi S; Ganji KK; Bandela V; Nagarajappa AK; Mohamed RN; Ahmed MA; Farhan M; Alwakid WN; Al-Hammad KAS; Alam MK
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jul; 34(5):789-795. PubMed ID: 34668306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal Adaptation of Monolithic High-Translucency Versus Porcelain-Veneered Zirconia Crowns.
Rayyan MR
Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(4):364-366. PubMed ID: 31283817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A micro-computed tomography analysis of internal and marginal fits of fixed partial dentures: Effect of preparation finish line designs on monolithic zirconia and heat-pressed zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate.
Elsherbini M; Sakrana AA; Amin RA; Diaa M; Özcan M; Al-Zordk W
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):90-99. PubMed ID: 36718906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal Discrepancies of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: The Influence of Preparation Designs and Sintering Techniques.
Ahmed WM; Abdallah MN; McCullagh AP; Wyatt CCL; Troczynski T; Carvalho RM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):288-298. PubMed ID: 30656786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional fit of self-glazed zirconia monolithic crowns fabricated by wet deposition.
Li Y; Zhao J; Sun Z; Lin N; Zheng Y
Dent Mater J; 2022 May; 41(3):363-367. PubMed ID: 35095041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Yilmaz B; Seker E; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):736-741. PubMed ID: 28434679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis.
Martinez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Ozcan M; Pradies G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):480-7. PubMed ID: 23527350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal Accuracy of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia Crowns Fabricated by Conventional and Digital Workflows.
Abduo J; Ho G; Centorame A; Chohan S; Park C; Abdouni R; Le P; Ngo C
J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):706-713. PubMed ID: 36321644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adaptation and uniformity of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by additive 3-dimensional gel deposition.
Sun Z; Shen Z; Zhao J; Zheng Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Dec; 130(6):859-865. PubMed ID: 35135676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
Hamza TA; Sherif RM
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of a CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Porcelain Laminate Veneer System.
Baig MR; Akbar AA; Sabti MY; Behbehani Z
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):502-511. PubMed ID: 34608712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Accuracy of Fit of Metal, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Crowns Made from Different Manufacturing Techniques.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Quran FA; AlJalam SA; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 30719780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans.
Kale E; Cilli M; Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of sintering time on the marginal and internal fit of monolithic zirconia crowns containing 3-4 mol% Y
Ozden YE; Guncu MB; Aktas G; Canay S
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):493. PubMed ID: 36380324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
