167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37452742)
1. Mid-term outcomes of minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: A single-center study and literature review.
Di Pierro GB; Di Lascio G; Lemma A; Grande P; Frisenda M; Del Giudice F; Antonini G; Nardi F; De Berardinis E; Cristini C; Franco G; Sciarra A; Salciccia S
Andrology; 2024 Mar; 12(3):624-632. PubMed ID: 37452742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes.
Chierigo F; Capogrosso P; Dehò F; Pozzi E; Schifano N; Belladelli F; Montorsi F; Salonia A
J Sex Med; 2019 Nov; 16(11):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 31501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Penoscrotal versus minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a single-center matched-pair analysis.
Grande P; Antonini G; Cristini C; De Berardinis E; Gatto A; Di Lascio G; Lemma A; Gentile G; Di Pierro GB
World J Urol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):1167-1174. PubMed ID: 29492584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Urinary Diversion: Technique and Outcomes.
Loh-Doyle J; Patil MB; Sawkar H; Wayne K; Boyd SD
J Sex Med; 2018 Jun; 15(6):907-913. PubMed ID: 29452979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of collagen fleece to correct residual curvature during inflatable penile prosthesis implantation (PICS technique) in patients with complex Peyronie disease: a multicenter study.
Falcone M; Preto M; Peretti F; Gontero P; Pyrgidis N; Sokolakis I; Hatzichristodoulou G
J Sex Med; 2023 Feb; 20(2):229-235. PubMed ID: 36763916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Infrapubic approach for placement of inflatable penile prosthesis: contemporary review of technique and implications.
Jayadevan R; Eleswarapu SV; Mills JN
Int J Impot Res; 2020 Jan; 32(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 31537910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Pelvic Radiation: Technical Considerations and Contemporary Outcomes.
Loh-Doyle J; Patil MB; Nakhoda Z; Nassiri N; Yip W; Wayne K; Doumanian L; Boyd SD
J Sex Med; 2018 Jul; 15(7):1049-1054. PubMed ID: 29731428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subcoronal inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: indications and outcomes.
Feng CL; Langbo WA; Anderson LK; Cao D; Bajic P; Amarasekera C; Wang V; Levine LA
J Sex Med; 2023 May; 20(6):888-892. PubMed ID: 37076135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Infrapubic vs Penoscrotal Approaches for 3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement: Do We Have a Winner?
Palmisano F; Boeri L; Cristini C; Antonini G; Spinelli MG; Franco G; Longo F; Gadda F; Colombo F; Montanari E
Sex Med Rev; 2018 Oct; 6(4):631-639. PubMed ID: 29730314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive infrapubic inflatable penile prosthesis implant for erectile dysfunction: evaluation of efficacy, satisfaction profile and complications.
Antonini G; Busetto GM; De Berardinis E; Giovannone R; Vicini P; Del Giudice F; Conti SL; Gentile V; Perito PE
Int J Impot Res; 2016; 28(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 26657316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Quality of Life After Inflatable Penile Implantation and Analysis of Factors Influencing Postsurgery Patient Satisfaction.
Luna E; Rodriguez D; Barrios D; Hernandez H; Bianco F; Gheiler E
J Sex Med; 2022 Sep; 19(9):1472-1478. PubMed ID: 35933304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Satisfaction rates of inflatable penile prosthesis in men who have sex with men are high.
La J; Loeb CA; Barham DW; Miller J; Chung E; Gross MS; Hatzichristodoulou G; Park SH; Perito PE; Suarez-Sarmiento A; Van Renterghem K; Yafi FA
Int J Impot Res; 2023 Sep; 35(6):564-568. PubMed ID: 35941220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rates among elderly male aged ≥75 years with inflatable penile prosthesis implant for medically refractory erectile dysfunction.
Chung E; Solomon M; DeYoung L; Brock GB
World J Urol; 2014 Feb; 32(1):173-7. PubMed ID: 23708698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Which patient may benefit the most from penile prosthesis implantation?
La Croce G; Schifano N; Pescatori E; Caraceni E; Colombo F; Bettocchi C; Carrino M; Vitarelli A; Pozza D; Fiordelise S; Varvello F; Paradiso M; Silvani M; Mondaini N; Natali A; Falcone M; Ceruti C; Salonia A; Antonini G; Cai T; Palmieri A; Dehò F; Capogrosso P
Andrology; 2022 Nov; 10(8):1567-1574. PubMed ID: 36088578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Satisfaction and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation for drug-refractory erectile dysfunction: mid-term results in a single center French cohort.
Dardenne E; Manach Q; Grande P; Campi R; Gomez F; Granger B; Misrai V; Bitker MO; Mozer P; Roupret M
Can J Urol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):10039-10044. PubMed ID: 31860421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suprapubic Fat Pad Excision with Simultaneous Placement of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis.
Baumgarten AS; Beilan JA; Shah BB; Loeb A; Bickell M; Parker J; Henry GD; Carrion RE
J Sex Med; 2019 Feb; 16(2):333-337. PubMed ID: 30692027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary versus revision implant for inflatable penile prosthesis: A propensity score-matched comparison.
Di Pierro GB; Lemma A; Di Lascio G; El Motassime A; Grande P; Di Giulio I; Salciccia S; Maggi M; Antonini G; De Berardinis E; Cristini C; Sciarra A
Andrologia; 2021 Dec; 53(11):e14240. PubMed ID: 34498769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical technique to maintain penile length after insertion of an inflatable penile prosthesis via infrapubic approach.
Borges F; Hakim L; Kline C
J Sex Med; 2006 May; 3(3):550-3. PubMed ID: 16681481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between AMS 700™ CX and Coloplast™ Titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie's disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Chung E; Solomon M; DeYoung L; Brock GB
J Sex Med; 2013 Nov; 10(11):2855-60. PubMed ID: 23210973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Absence of a Validated English-Language Survey to Assess Prosthesis Satisfaction: A Prospective Cohort Using the Sexual Quality of Life After Penile Prosthesis.
Carlos EC; Nosé BD; Barton GJ; Davis L; Lentz AC
J Sex Med; 2020 Nov; 17(11):2307-2310. PubMed ID: 32811792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
