These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37452873)
1. SPECT and PET myocardial perfusion imaging in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland results of the first joint survey of 2021. Lindner O; Hacker M; Burchert W; Buechel RR Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Oct; 50(12):3602-3608. PubMed ID: 37452873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Myocardial Perfusion SPECT and ATTR imaging 2021 in Germany: Results of the 9th Survey. Lindner O; Schaefer WM; Silber S; Rischpler C; Burchert W Nuklearmedizin; 2023 Aug; 62(4):235-243. PubMed ID: 37268009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Myocardial perfusion SPECT in Germany from 2012 to 2021: insights into development and quality indicators. Lindner O; Schäfer W; Rischpler C; Silber S; Burchert W; Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 May; 50(6):1621-1628. PubMed ID: 36780003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of myocardial perfusion imaging and estimation of associated radiation doses in Germany from 2005 to 2012. Lindner O; Bengel FM; Hacker M; Schäfer W; Burchert W; Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 May; 41(5):963-71. PubMed ID: 24519554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Myocardial perfusion SPECT 2015 in Germany. Results of the 7 Lindner O; Burchert W; Schäfer W; Hacker M Nuklearmedizin; 2017 Feb; 56(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 27909712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Germany in 2009: utilization and state of the practice. Lindner O; Burchert W; Bengel FM; Zimmermann R; Vom Dahl J; Schäfers M; ; Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2011 Aug; 38(8):1485-92. PubMed ID: 21503763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study. Nasis A; Ko BS; Leung MC; Antonis PR; Nandurkar D; Wong DT; Kyi L; Cameron JD; Troupis JM; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1812-21. PubMed ID: 23430194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of CT attenuation correction on the viability pattern assessed by 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT/ 18F-FDG PET. Nkoulou R; Pazhenkottil AP; Buechel RR; Husmann L; Valenta I; Herzog BA; Wolfrum M; Ghadri JR; Kaufmann PA Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Jul; 27(6):913-21. PubMed ID: 20931288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Real-time respiratory triggered SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging using CZT technology: impact of respiratory phase matching between SPECT and low-dose CT for attenuation correction. Clerc OF; Fuchs TA; Possner M; Vontobel J; Mikulicic F; Stehli J; Liga R; Benz DC; Gräni C; Pazhenkottil AP; Gaemperli O; Buechel RR; Kaufmann PA Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jan; 18(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 26985074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics and key differences between patient populations receiving imaging modalities for coronary artery disease diagnosis in the US. Pelletier-Galarneau M; Vandenbroucke E; Lu M; Li O BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2023 May; 23(1):251. PubMed ID: 37189049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy 2012 in Germany. Results of the 6th Query]. Lindner O; Burchert W; Schäfers M; Schaefer W Nuklearmedizin; 2014; 53(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 24193544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects measured by CT coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Tamarappoo BK; Dey D; Nakazato R; Shmilovich H; Smith T; Cheng VY; Thomson LE; Hayes SW; Friedman JD; Germano G; Slomka PJ; Berman DS JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1010-9. PubMed ID: 20947046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Current Status of Patient Radiation Exposure of Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomographic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. Desiderio MC; Lundbye JB; Baker WL; Farrell MB; Jerome SD; Heller GV Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 11(12):e007565. PubMed ID: 30558499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness of Pharmacologic SPECT and PET MPI in Symptomatic CAD Patients. Patel KK; Al Badarin F; Chan PS; Spertus JA; Courter S; Kennedy KF; Case JA; McGhie AI; Heller GV; Bateman TM JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Sep; 12(9):1821-1831. PubMed ID: 31326480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ischemic burden assessment of myocardial perfusion CT, compared with SPECT using semi-quantitative and quantitative approaches. Kwon O; Hwang HJ; Koo HJ; Yang DH; Kang HJ; Kim JA; Moon DH; Kim HS; Kang JW; Kim YH Int J Cardiol; 2019 Mar; 278():287-294. PubMed ID: 30587418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Germany. Results of the 2005 query and current status]. Lindner O; Burchert W; Bengel FM; Zimmermann R; Vom Dahl J; Schäfer W; Büll U; Schober O; Schwaiger M; Kluge R; Schäfers M; Nuklearmedizin; 2007; 46(2):49-55. PubMed ID: 17393039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of appropriate use on the prognostic value of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Doukky R; Hayes K; Frogge N; Balakrishnan G; Dontaraju VS; Rangel MO; Golzar Y; Garcia-Sayan E; Hendel RC Circulation; 2013 Oct; 128(15):1634-43. PubMed ID: 24021779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved Performance of PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to SPECT in the Evaluation of Suspected CAD. Alam L; Omar AMS; Patel KK Curr Cardiol Rep; 2023 Apr; 25(4):281-293. PubMed ID: 36826689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]