171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37452975)
21. Initial Experience with Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Adolescent Population.
Hey MT; Mayhew MM; Rico S; Calisto J; Alkhoury F
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Nov; 31(11):1346-1350. PubMed ID: 34252321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Patients Less than 15 kg: A Single Center Review.
Scoville SD; Bergus K; Diefenbach KA; Dajusta DG; Fuchs ME; Michalsky MP; Aldrink JH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2024 May; 34(5):434-437. PubMed ID: 38294893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Is robotic utilization associated with increased minimally invasive colorectal surgery rates? Surgeon-level evidence.
Justiniano CF; Becerra AZ; Loria A; Xu Z; Aquina CT; Temple LK; Fleming FJ
Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5618-5626. PubMed ID: 35024928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Pediatric Mini-Invasive Splenectomy Comparing Laparoscopy With or Without Robotic Approach: A Single-Center Study.
Belbahri I; Planchamp T; Ait Aissa D; Larcher C; Mouttalib S; Le Mandat A; Abbo O
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2023 Jul; 33(7):703-706. PubMed ID: 37294936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Learning curve of robotic assisted pyeloplasty for pediatric urology fellows.
Tasian GE; Wiebe DJ; Casale P
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4 Suppl):1622-6. PubMed ID: 23410982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pediatric robotic surgery: An overview.
Jacobson JC; Pandya SR
Semin Pediatr Surg; 2023 Feb; 32(1):151255. PubMed ID: 36736161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robotic-assisted colectomy in children: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.
Martin G; Montalva L; Paré S; Ali L; Martinez-Vinson C; Colas AE; Bonnard A
J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2287-2295. PubMed ID: 37336840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The use of robotics in pediatric surgery: my initial experience.
Camps JI
Pediatr Surg Int; 2011 Sep; 27(9):991-6. PubMed ID: 21516500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Using a modified Delphi process to explore international surgeon-reported benefits of robotic-assisted surgery to perform abdominal rectopexy.
Keating T; Fleming CA; Brannigan AE;
Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Dec; 26(12):953-962. PubMed ID: 35986805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Total oesophago-gastric dissociation in neurologically impaired children: Laparoscopic vs robotic approach.
Mattioli G; Wong MCY; Angotti R; Mazzola C; Arrigo S; Gandullia P; Mancardi M; Fusi G; Messina M; Zanaboni C; Razore B; Barabino A; Molinaro F
Int J Med Robot; 2020 Feb; 16(1):e2048. PubMed ID: 31797517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Adoption of Robotic Adrenalectomy: A Two-Institution Study of Surgeon Learning Curve.
Collins RA; Wang TS; Dream S; Solórzano CC; Kiernan CM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 30(7):4167-4178. PubMed ID: 37040047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of type of minimally invasive approach on open conversions across ten common procedures in different specialties.
Shah PC; de Groot A; Cerfolio R; Huang WC; Huang K; Song C; Li Y; Kreaden U; Oh DS
Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):6067-6075. PubMed ID: 35141775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Magnet-Assisted Robotic Prostatectomy Using the da Vinci SP Robot: An Initial Case Series.
Steinberg RL; Johnson BA; Meskawi M; Gettman MT; Cadeddu JA
J Endourol; 2019 Oct; 33(10):829-834. PubMed ID: 31411052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party.
Silay MS; Spinoit AF; Undre S; Fiala V; Tandogdu Z; Garmanova T; Guttilla A; Sancaktutar AA; Haid B; Waldert M; Goyal A; Serefoglu EC; Baldassarre E; Manzoni G; Radford A; Subramaniam R; Cherian A; Hoebeke P; Jacobs M; Rocco B; Yuriy R; Zattoni F; Kocvara R; Koh CJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Aug; 12(4):229.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27346071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Utilization of robotics in pediatric surgical oncology.
Jacobson JC; Scrushy MG; Gillory LA; Pandya SR
Semin Pediatr Surg; 2023 Feb; 32(1):151263. PubMed ID: 36753917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.
Choussein S; Srouji SS; Farland LV; Wietsma A; Missmer SA; Hollis M; Yu RN; Pozner CN; Gargiulo AR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28734971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Conversion Rate in Pediatric Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Looking for the Culprit.
Di Fabrizio D; Lisi G; Lauriti G; Di Renzo D; Lannutti A; Marino N; Lelli Chiesa P
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Mar; 30(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 31976805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Outcomes after pediatric open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty at academic institutions.
Chan YY; Durbin-Johnson B; Sturm RM; Kurzrock EA
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Feb; 13(1):49.e1-49.e6. PubMed ID: 28288777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results.
Esposito C; Masieri L; Castagnetti M; Sforza S; Farina A; Cerulo M; Cini C; Del Conte F; Escolino M
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):667.e1-667.e8. PubMed ID: 31734119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology: an update.
Casale P; Kojima Y
Scand J Surg; 2009; 98(2):110-9. PubMed ID: 19799048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
