These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37453031)

  • 1. A cost-effective model for training in Robot-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy.
    Daykan Y; Farinha R; Schraffordt SE; Mottrie A; O'Reilly BA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Dec; 34(12):3059-3062. PubMed ID: 37453031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.
    Giannini A; Russo E; Malacarne E; Cecchi E; Mannella P; Simoncini T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Feb; 71(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 30318878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic floor surgery: Review.
    Daykan Y; Rotem R; O'Reilly BA
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 91():102418. PubMed ID: 37776580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single port robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and tips.
    Griebel L; Misal M; Cornella J; Khan A; Wolter C; Yi J
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Oct; 33(10):2905. PubMed ID: 35333928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robot-assisted Transvaginal Single-site Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Guan X; Guan Z; Koythong T; Liu J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1141. PubMed ID: 33249270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mesh Exposure After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pelvic Floor Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    van Zanten F; van Iersel JJ; Hartog FE; Aalders KIM; Lenters E; Broeders IAMJ; Schraffordt Koops SE
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):636-642. PubMed ID: 29964179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A "cooler" simulation model for robotic cuff closure and sacrocolpopexy.
    Maldonado DV; Linder BJ; Occhino JA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Oct; 33(10):2907-2910. PubMed ID: 35403881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.
    Alas AN; Anger JT
    Curr Urol Rep; 2015 May; 16(5):33. PubMed ID: 25874589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical Outcomes of Paravaginal Repair After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
    Hoke TP; Goldstein H; Saks EK; Vakili B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):892-895. PubMed ID: 29371174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical cost of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparison of two robotic platforms.
    Glass Clark S; Shepherd JP; Sassani JC; Bonidie M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 36282303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical techniques for advanced stage pelvic organ prolapse.
    Brown DN; Strauchon C; Gonzalez H; Gruber D
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Feb; 68(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 26448444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic Complete Excision of Sacrocolpopexy Mesh: Standardized Technique.
    Suarez-Salvador E; Yi J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(7):1226. PubMed ID: 31005582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A live porcine model for robotic sacrocolpopexy training.
    Kasabwala K; Goueli R; Culligan PJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 31055610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic mesh-supported pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: expanding the options of pelvic floor repair.
    Bolovis D; Hitzl W; Brucker C
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):815-823. PubMed ID: 34498174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.