These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37453281)

  • 1. Pupillometric and behavioural evidence shows no differences between polyseme and homonym processing.
    Haro J; López-Cortés N; Ferré P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Aug; 238():103985. PubMed ID: 37453281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sustained meaning activation for polysemous but not homonymous words: evidence from EEG.
    MacGregor LJ; Bouwsema J; Klepousniotou E
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():126-38. PubMed ID: 25576909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Offline dominance and zeugmatic similarity normings of variably ambiguous words assessed against a neural language model (BERT).
    DeLong KA; Trott S; Kutas M
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Jun; 55(4):1537-1557. PubMed ID: 35689168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Semantic Similarity on Learning Ambiguous Words in a Second Language: An Event-Related Potential Study.
    Zhang Y; Lu Y; Liang L; Chen B
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1633. PubMed ID: 32765371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emotionality effects in ambiguous word recognition: The crucial role of the affective congruence between distinct meanings of ambiguous words.
    Ferré P; Haro J; Huete-Pérez D; Fraga I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jul; 74(7):1234-1243. PubMed ID: 33438523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How meaning similarity influences ambiguous word processing: the current state of the literature.
    Eddington CM; Tokowicz N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):13-37. PubMed ID: 24889119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition?
    Haro J; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):679-698. PubMed ID: 29280032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain representations of lexical ambiguity: Disentangling homonymy, polysemy, and their meanings.
    Liang X; Huang F; Liu D; Xu M
    Brain Lang; 2024 Jun; 253():105426. PubMed ID: 38815503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing of irregular polysemes in sentence reading.
    Brocher A; Foraker S; Koenig JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1798-1813. PubMed ID: 27065198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
    Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.
    Peleg O; Edelist L; Eviatar Z; Bergerbest D
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):519-37. PubMed ID: 26637339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is There an Orthographic Boost for Ambiguous Words During Their Processing?
    Haro J; Comesaña M; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Apr; 48(2):519-534. PubMed ID: 30478738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Representational Distance between Meanings on Recognition of Ambiguous Spoken Words.
    Mirman D; Strauss TJ; Dixon JA; Magnuson JS
    Cogn Sci; 2009 Jan; 34(1):161-173. PubMed ID: 20354577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemispheric asymmetries in semantic processing: evidence from false memories for ambiguous words.
    Faust M; Ben-Artzi E; Harel I
    Brain Lang; 2008 Jun; 105(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 18178246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of homonym meaning frequency estimates derived from movie and television subtitles, free association, and explicit ratings.
    Rice CA; Beekhuizen B; Dubrovsky V; Stevenson S; Armstrong BC
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Jun; 51(3):1399-1425. PubMed ID: 30203161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic Ambiguity Effects in L2 Word Recognition.
    Ishida T
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):523-536. PubMed ID: 29168115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comprehension of lexical ambiguity in healthy aging, mild cognitive impairment, and mild Alzheimer's disease.
    Taler V; Klepousniotou E; Phillips NA
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Apr; 47(5):1332-43. PubMed ID: 19428397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks.
    Piercey CD; Joordens S
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):657-66. PubMed ID: 10946548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of representational distance between meanings on the neural correlates of semantic ambiguity.
    Grindrod CM; Garnett EO; Malyutina S; den Ouden DB
    Brain Lang; 2014 Dec; 139():23-35. PubMed ID: 25463814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lexical access and selection of contextually appropriate meaning for ambiguous words.
    Ihara A; Hayakawa T; Wei Q; Munetsuna S; Fujimaki N
    Neuroimage; 2007 Nov; 38(3):576-88. PubMed ID: 17888689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.