128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37453699)
1. Testing behavioral economics messages to increase non-responders' participation in organized colorectal cancer-screening programs: A randomized controlled trial.
Gorini G; Betti E; Stoffel S; Falini P; Iossa A; Senore C; Baiocchi D; Zappa M; Battisti F; Mantellini P
Prev Med; 2023 Sep; 174():107615. PubMed ID: 37453699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Testing behavioral interventions to optimize participation in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program in Catalonia, Spain.
Stoffel S; Benito L; Milà N; Travier N; Binefa G; Vidal C; Espinosa J; Moreno V; Garcia M
Prev Med; 2019 Feb; 119():58-62. PubMed ID: 30594532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of a Doctor's Invitation on Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Cluster Randomized Trial.
Barthe J; Perrodeau E; Gilberg S; Ravaud P; Ghasarossian C; Marchand-Buttin F; Deyra J; Falcoff H
Am J Med; 2015 Sep; 128(9):1024.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25908395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies.
Van Roosbroeck S; Hoeck S; Van Hal G
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 22560885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two randomized controlled trials for colorectal cancer screening invitations developed using a behavioral science approach.
Tinmouth J; Llovet D; Sutradhar R; Tsiplova K; Roushani J; Lee A; Hader J; Rabeneck L; Paszat L
Prev Med; 2022 Feb; 155():106918. PubMed ID: 34953810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of mailed invitation strategies to improve fecal occult blood test participation in men: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Duncan A; Zajac I; Flight I; Stewart BJ; Wilson C; Turnbull D
Trials; 2013 Jul; 14():239. PubMed ID: 23902589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of a brief phone intervention to increase participation in a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme: a randomized controlled trial.
Selva A; Torà N; Pascual E; Espinàs JA; Baré M
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Oct; 21(10):1120-1129. PubMed ID: 31099455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tailored message interventions versus typical messages for increasing participation in colorectal cancer screening among a non-adherent population: A randomized controlled trial.
Hirai K; Ishikawa Y; Fukuyoshi J; Yonekura A; Harada K; Shibuya D; Yamamoto S; Mizota Y; Hamashima C; Saito H
BMC Public Health; 2016 May; 16():431. PubMed ID: 27220976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increasing participation in colorectal cancer screening: results from a cluster randomized trial of directly mailed gFOBT kits to previous nonresponders.
Tinmouth J; Patel J; Austin PC; Baxter NN; Brouwers MC; Earle C; Levitt C; Lu Y; Mackinnon M; Paszat L; Rabeneck L
Int J Cancer; 2015 Mar; 136(6):E697-703. PubMed ID: 25195923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the effectiveness of GP endorsement on increasing participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Damery S; Smith S; Clements A; Holder R; Nichols L; Draper H; Clifford S; Parker L; Hobbs R; Wilson S
Trials; 2012 Feb; 13():18. PubMed ID: 22348399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Viewpoints of the target population regarding barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in the Czech Republic.
Kroupa R; Ondrackova M; Kovalcikova P; Dastych M; Pavlik T; Kunovsky L; Dolina J
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Mar; 25(9):1132-1141. PubMed ID: 30863000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Text messaging as a tool to improve cancer screening programs (M-TICS Study): A randomized controlled trial protocol.
Vives N; Farre A; Ibáñez-Sanz G; Vidal C; Binefa G; Milà N; Pérez-Lacasta MJ; Travier N; Benito L; Espinàs JA; Bagaria G; Garcia M
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245806. PubMed ID: 33481914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Personalized colorectal cancer screening: study protocol of a mixed-methods study on the effectiveness of tailored intervals based on prior f-Hb concentration in a fit-based colorectal cancer screening program (PERFECT-FIT).
Breekveldt ECH; Toes-Zoutendijk E; de Jonge L; Spaander MCW; Dekker E; van Kemenade FJ; van Vuuren AJ; Ramakers CRB; Nagtegaal ID; van Leerdam ME; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
BMC Gastroenterol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):45. PubMed ID: 36814185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Patient-Directed Messaging on Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Oyalowo A; Forde KA; Lamanna A; Kochman ML
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Mar; 5(3):e224529. PubMed ID: 35357457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing participation in colorectal cancer screening programs in Spain.
Vanaclocha-Espi M; Ibáñez J; Molina-Barceló A; Pérez E; Nolasco A; Font R; Pérez-Riquelme F; de la Vega M; Arana-Arri E; Oceja M; Espinàs JA; Portillo I; Salas D;
Prev Med; 2017 Dec; 105():190-196. PubMed ID: 28887191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation intentions and colorectal screening: a randomized trial in safety-net clinics.
Greiner KA; Daley CM; Epp A; James A; Yeh HW; Geana M; Born W; Engelman KK; Shellhorn J; Hester CM; LeMaster J; Buckles DC; Ellerbeck EF
Am J Prev Med; 2014 Dec; 47(6):703-14. PubMed ID: 25455115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tailored telephone counselling to increase participation of underusers in a population-based colorectal cancer-screening programme with faecal occult blood test: A randomized controlled trial.
Denis B; Broc G; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Gana K; Perrin P
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2017 Feb; 65(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28089385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An advance notification letter increases participation in colorectal cancer screening.
Cole SR; Smith A; Wilson C; Turnbull D; Esterman A; Young GP
J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):73-5. PubMed ID: 17626705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Participation in Competing Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Health Services Study (PICCOLINO Study).
Pilonis ND; Bugajski M; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Pisera M; Pawlak E; Regula J; Kaminski MF
Gastroenterology; 2021 Mar; 160(4):1097-1105. PubMed ID: 33307024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Behavioral economics informed message content in text message reminders to improve cervical screening participation: Two pragmatic randomized controlled trials.
Huf S; Kerrison RS; King D; Chadborn T; Richmond A; Cunningham D; Friedman E; Shukla H; Tseng FM; Judah G; Darzi A; Vlaev I
Prev Med; 2020 Oct; 139():106170. PubMed ID: 32610059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
