These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37453775)

  • 1. Shoeprint image retrieval and crime scene shoeprint image linking by using convolutional neural network and normalized cross correlation.
    Wen Z; Curran JM; Wevers G
    Sci Justice; 2023 Jul; 63(4):439-450. PubMed ID: 37453775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robust Shoeprint Retrieval Method Based on Local-to-Global Feature Matching for Real Crime Scenes.
    Cui J; Zhao X; Liu N; Morgachev S; Li D
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):422-430. PubMed ID: 30132895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic retrieval of shoeprint images using blocked sparse representation.
    Alizadeh S; Kose C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():103-114. PubMed ID: 28628783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digitally processing an image of a shoe impression in blood.
    Daniel O; Levi A; Chaikovsky A; Cohen Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):1143-1147. PubMed ID: 33332705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-Layer Feature Based Shoeprint Verification Algorithm for Camera Sensor Images.
    Wang X; Wu Y; Zhang T
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 May; 19(11):. PubMed ID: 31159201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of scale-invariance feature transform approach to recognize and retrieve incomplete shoeprints.
    Wei CH; Li Y; Gwo CY
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 May; 58(3):625-30. PubMed ID: 23551279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical note: The Next Step - a semi-automatic coding and comparison system for forensic footwear impressions.
    Daniel O; Levi A; Pertsev R; Issan Y; Pasternak Z; Cohen A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Aug; 337():111378. PubMed ID: 35839684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tracing recent outdoor geolocation by analyzing microbiota from shoe soles and shoeprints even after indoor walking.
    Zhang J; Yu D; Wang Y; Shi L; Wang T; Simayijiang H; Yan J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102869. PubMed ID: 37054666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developing a spatial-temporal method for the geographic investigation of shoeprint evidence.
    Lin G; Elmes G; Walnoha M; Chen X
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jan; 54(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 19018933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel technique for automatic shoeprint image retrieval.
    AlGarni G; Hamiane M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Oct; 181(1-3):10-4. PubMed ID: 18829192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining Shoe Length from Partial Shoeprints.
    Zhang H; Liu L; Luo Y; Chang R
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):2129-2137. PubMed ID: 32898298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shoeprint retrieval: Core point alignment for pattern comparison.
    Gwo CY; Wei CH
    Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):341-350. PubMed ID: 27702449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survey of 1276 shoeprint impressions and development of an automatic shoeprint pattern matching facility.
    Hannigan TJ; Fleury LM; Reilly RB; O'Mullane BA; deChazal P
    Sci Justice; 2006; 46(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 17002210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring the accuracy of automatic shoeprint recognition methods.
    Luostarinen T; Lehmussola A
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Nov; 59(6):1627-34. PubMed ID: 24846765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated processing of shoeprint images based on the Fourier transform for use in forensic science.
    de Chazal P; Flynn J; Reilly RB
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2005 Mar; 27(3):341-350. PubMed ID: 15747790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying randomly acquired characteristics on outsoles in terms of shape and position.
    Speir JA; Richetelli N; Fagert M; Hite M; Bodziak WJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():399-411. PubMed ID: 27416269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ShoeCase: A data set of mock crime scene footwear impressions.
    Tibben A; McGuire M; Renfro S; Carriquiry A
    Data Brief; 2023 Oct; 50():109546. PubMed ID: 37780466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Location distribution of randomly acquired characteristics on a shoe sole.
    Kaplan-Damary N; Mandel M; Yekutieli Y; Shor Y; Wiesner S
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Sep; 67(5):1801-1809. PubMed ID: 35855550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The application of TreadMatch scans to aid the process of footwear mark comparison.
    Reel S; Harris R; Reidy S; Chambers J
    Sci Justice; 2022 Sep; 62(5):530-539. PubMed ID: 36336446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing footwear impressions that are close non-matches using correlation-based approaches.
    Venkatasubramanian G; Hegde V; Padi S; Iyer H; Herman M
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):890-909. PubMed ID: 33682930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.