166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37455538)
1. The net benefit for time-to-event outcome in oncology clinical trials with treatment switching.
Fukuda M; Sakamaki K; Oba K
Clin Trials; 2023 Dec; 20(6):670-680. PubMed ID: 37455538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-stage estimation to adjust for treatment switching in randomised trials: a simulation study investigating the use of inverse probability weighting instead of re-censoring.
Latimer NR; Abrams KR; Siebert U
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):69. PubMed ID: 30935369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Doubly robust estimator of risk in the presence of censoring dependent on time-varying covariates: application to a primary prevention trial for coronary events with pravastatin.
Kawahara T; Shinozaki T; Matsuyama Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):204. PubMed ID: 32736528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Generalized pairwise comparisons for censored data: An overview.
Deltuvaite-Thomas V; Verbeeck J; Burzykowski T; Buyse M; Tournigand C; Molenberghs G; Thas O
Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100354. PubMed ID: 36127290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator.
Willems S; Schat A; van Noorden MS; Fiocco M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):323-335. PubMed ID: 26988930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Model selection for survival individualized treatment rules using the jackknife estimator.
Honvoh GD; Cho H; Kosorok MR
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):328. PubMed ID: 36550398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Doubly robust estimator for net survival rate in analyses of cancer registry data.
Komukai S; Hattori S
Biometrics; 2017 Mar; 73(1):124-133. PubMed ID: 27479200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new measure of treatment effect in clinical trials involving competing risks based on generalized pairwise comparisons.
Cantagallo E; De Backer M; Kicinski M; Ozenne B; Collette L; Legrand C; Buyse M; Péron J
Biom J; 2021 Feb; 63(2):272-288. PubMed ID: 32939818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fair comparisons of cause-specific and relative survival by accounting for the systematic removal of patients from risk-sets.
Wells M; Rutherford MJ; Lambert PC
Cancer Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 86():102408. PubMed ID: 37591148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Strengthening the interpretability of clinical trial results by assessing the effect of informative censoring on the primary estimand in PRECISION.
Bao W; Gaffney M; Pressler ML; Fayyad R; Wisemandle W; Beckerman B; Wolski KE; Nissen SE
Clin Trials; 2020 Oct; 17(5):535-544. PubMed ID: 32643966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Restricted Net Treatment Benefit in oncology.
Piffoux M; Ozenne B; De Backer M; Buyse M; Chiem JC; Péron J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 170():111340. PubMed ID: 38570079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved two-stage estimation to adjust for treatment switching in randomised trials: g-estimation to address time-dependent confounding.
Latimer NR; White IR; Tilling K; Siebert U
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2900-2918. PubMed ID: 32223524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adjusting win statistics for dependent censoring.
Dong G; Huang B; Wang D; Verbeeck J; Wang J; Hoaglin DC
Pharm Stat; 2021 May; 20(3):440-450. PubMed ID: 33247544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved precision in the analysis of randomized trials with survival outcomes, without assuming proportional hazards.
Díaz I; Colantuoni E; Hanley DF; Rosenblum M
Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Jul; 25(3):439-468. PubMed ID: 29492746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correcting the bias of the net benefit estimator due to right-censored observations.
Péron J; Idlhaj M; Maucort-Boulch D; Giai J; Roy P; Collette L; Buyse M; Ozenne B
Biom J; 2021 Apr; 63(4):893-906. PubMed ID: 33615533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Causal inference for long-term survival in randomised trials with treatment switching: Should re-censoring be applied when estimating counterfactual survival times?
Latimer NR; White IR; Abrams KR; Siebert U
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2475-2493. PubMed ID: 29940824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variable selection using inverse probability of censoring weighting.
Kojima M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Nov; 32(11):2184-2206. PubMed ID: 37675496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Win statistics (win ratio, win odds, and net benefit) can complement one another to show the strength of the treatment effect on time-to-event outcomes.
Dong G; Huang B; Verbeeck J; Cui Y; Song J; Gamalo-Siebers M; Wang D; Hoaglin DC; Seifu Y; Mütze T; Kolassa J
Pharm Stat; 2023 Jan; 22(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 35757986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting (IPCW) adjusted win ratio statistic: an unbiased estimator in the presence of independent censoring.
Dong G; Mao L; Huang B; Gamalo-Siebers M; Wang J; Yu G; Hoaglin DC
J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 30(5):882-899. PubMed ID: 32552451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
