These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3745675)
1. A central spectrum theory of binaural processing. Evidence from dichotic pitch. Raatgever J; Bilsen FA J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):429-41. PubMed ID: 3745675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A central spectrum theory of binaural processing. The binaural edge pitch revisited. Frijns JH; Raatgever J; Bilsen FA J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):442-51. PubMed ID: 3745676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dichotic pitches as illusions of binaural unmasking. II. The Fourcin pitch and the dichotic repetition pitch. Culling JF; Marshall DH; Summerfield AQ J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3527-39. PubMed ID: 9637036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the dichotic pitch of simultaneously presented interaurally delayed white noises. Implications for binaural theory. Bilsen FA; Raatgever J J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jul; 108(1):272-84. PubMed ID: 10923891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Probability distributions of interaural phase and level differences in binaural detection stimuli. Zurek PM J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1927-32. PubMed ID: 1960286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The lateralization of simple dichotic pitches. Akeroyd MA; Summerfield AQ J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jul; 108(1):316-34. PubMed ID: 10923895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Signal detectability in the presence of monotic or dichotic noise bands of equal or unequal levels. Stillman JA; Irwin RJ Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 2326150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Melody recognition using three types of dichotic-pitch stimulus. Akeroyd MA; Moore BC; Moore GA J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1498-504. PubMed ID: 11572360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dichotic pitches as illusions of binaural unmasking. I. Huggins' pitch and the "binaural edge pitch". Culling JF; Summerfield AQ; Marshall DH J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3509-26. PubMed ID: 9637035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binaural masking experiments using noise maskers with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences. I: Influence of signal and masker duration. Kohlrausch A J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1737-48. PubMed ID: 2262630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Binaural forward and backward masking: evidence for sluggishness in binaural detection. Kollmeier B; Gilkey RH J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1709-19. PubMed ID: 2341675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions. Jiang D; McAlpine D; Palmer AR J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jun; 77(6):3085-106. PubMed ID: 9212259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extension of a binaural cross-correlation model by contralateral inhibition. I. Simulation of lateralization for stationary signals. Lindemann W J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Dec; 80(6):1608-22. PubMed ID: 3794066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trading of intensity and interaural coherence in dichotic pitch stimuli. Culling JF; Lewis HG J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1908-14. PubMed ID: 20968362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel binaural pitch elicited by phase-modulated noise: MEG and psychophysical observations. Witton C; Hillebrand A; Furlong PL; Henning GB Cereb Cortex; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1271-81. PubMed ID: 21832287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. III. Dependence on temporal parameters. Breebaart J; van de Par S; Kohlrausch A J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1105-17. PubMed ID: 11519578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Binaural models and the strength of dichotic pitches. Hartmann WM; Zhang PX J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec; 114(6 Pt 1):3317-26. PubMed ID: 14714812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of interaural frequency difference on binaural fusion evidenced by electrophysiological versus psychoacoustical measures. Zhou J; Durrant JD J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1508-15. PubMed ID: 14514204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. II. Dependence on spectral parameters. Breebaart J; van de Par S; Kohlrausch A J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1089-104. PubMed ID: 11519577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]