These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37457044)

  • 21. Assessing patient satisfaction among ABHRS surgeons: Opportunities to improve.
    Hakimi AA; Yasmeh JP; Foulad DS
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Feb; 19(2):462-465. PubMed ID: 31134743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Building better pediatric surgeons: A sentiment analysis of online physician review websites.
    Butler LR; Tang JE; Hess SM; White CA; Arvind V; Kim JS; Allen AK; Ranade SC
    J Child Orthop; 2022 Dec; 16(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 36483646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does experience matter? A meta-analysis of physician rating websites of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
    Jack RA; Burn MB; McCulloch PC; Liberman SR; Varner KE; Harris JD
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2018 Apr; 102(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 28853024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sentiment Analysis of Online Patient-Written Reviews of Vascular Surgeons.
    Cho LD; Tang JE; Pitaro N; Bai H; Cooke PV; Arvind V; Kim J; Ting W
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2023 Jan; 88():249-255. PubMed ID: 36028181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Online ratings of orthopedic surgeons: analysis of 2185 reviews.
    Bakhsh W; Mesfin A
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Aug; 43(8):359-63. PubMed ID: 25136868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What Are Patients Saying About Minimally Invasive Spine Surgeons Online: A Sentiment Analysis of 2,235 Physician Review Website Reviews.
    Tang J; White CA; Arvind V; Cho S; Kim JS; Steinberger J
    Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24113. PubMed ID: 35573577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of social media presence, age, and patient reported wait times on physician review websites for sports medicine surgeons.
    Sama AJ; Matichak DP; Schiller NC; Li DJ; Donnally CJ; Damodar D; Cole BJ
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2021 Oct; 21():101502. PubMed ID: 34350098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
    Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of Online Reviews of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Orthopaedic Practices Using Natural Language Processing.
    Langerhuizen DWG; Brown LE; Doornberg JN; Ring D; Kerkhoffs GMMJ; Janssen SJ
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2021 Apr; 29(8):337-344. PubMed ID: 32796371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The majority of negative online otolaryngology reviews are non-clinical.
    Garcia JR; Yu SE; Rohatgi AP; Pollock JR; Naples JG
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2024; 45(4):104335. PubMed ID: 38678800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Characterizing extremely negative reviews of total joint arthroplasty practices and surgeons on yelp.com.
    Arthur JR; Etzioni D; Schwartz AJ
    Arthroplast Today; 2019 Jun; 5(2):216-220. PubMed ID: 31286047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Positive Patient Experience: A Comprehensive Analysis of Plastic Surgery Online Reviews.
    Chang IA; Wells MW; Chang IA; Arquette CP; Tang CJ; Gatherwright JR; Furnas HJ
    Aesthet Surg J; 2022 Aug; 42(9):1083-1093. PubMed ID: 35417545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reporting of Patient Experience Data on Health Systems' Websites and Commercial Physician-Rating Websites: Mixed-Methods Analysis.
    Lagu T; Norton CM; Russo LM; Priya A; Goff SL; Lindenauer PK
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e12007. PubMed ID: 30916654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Online Ratings of Facial Plastic Surgeons: Worthwhile Additions to Conventional Patient Experience Surveys.
    Bovenzi CD; Manges KA; Krein H; Heffelfinger R
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2021; 23(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 32716653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of Surgeon Gender on Online Physician Reviews.
    Marrero K; King E; Fingeret AL
    J Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 245():510-515. PubMed ID: 31446193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Getting to the Bottom of Patient Experiences with Genital Gender Affirmation Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Online Reviews.
    Moog D; Latack KR; Adidharma W; Haley C; Satterwhite T; Morrison SD
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Dec; 45(6):2990-2995. PubMed ID: 33543343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors Impacting Online Ratings for Otolaryngologists.
    Calixto NE; Chiao W; Durr ML; Jiang N
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 Aug; 127(8):521-526. PubMed ID: 29882425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Online doctor reviews: do they track surgeon volume, a proxy for quality of care?
    Segal J; Sacopulos M; Sheets V; Thurston I; Brooks K; Puccia R
    J Med Internet Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):e50. PubMed ID: 22491423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Online Physician Reviews in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery: What Do Patients Really Want?
    Asanad K; Parameshwar PS; Houman J; Spiegel BM; Daskivich TJ; Anger JT
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(2):109-114. PubMed ID: 29474282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of sentiment and word frequency analysis of physician review sites to evaluate refractive surgery care.
    Vought V; Vought R; Lee AS; Zhou I; Garneni M; Greenstein SA
    Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res; 2024; 4(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 38590556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.