BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37458967)

  • 1. Read carefully, because this is important! How value-driven strategies impact sentence memory.
    Chung YMW; Federmeier KD
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Oct; 51(7):1511-1526. PubMed ID: 37458967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Impact of Linguistic Prediction Violations on Downstream Recognition Memory and Sentence Recall.
    Hubbard RJ; Federmeier KD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 Jan; 36(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 37902591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
    Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Downstream Behavioral and Electrophysiological Consequences of Word Prediction on Recognition Memory.
    Hubbard RJ; Rommers J; Jacobs CL; Federmeier KD
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():291. PubMed ID: 31555111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefits and costs of predictive processing: How sentential constraint and word expectedness affect memory formation.
    Höltje G; Mecklinger A
    Brain Res; 2022 Aug; 1788():147942. PubMed ID: 35562077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When and where did it happen? Systematic differences in recall of core and optional sentence information.
    Chromý J; Vojvodić S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jan; 77(1):111-132. PubMed ID: 36786323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Free recall test experience potentiates strategy-driven effects of value on memory.
    Cohen MS; Rissman J; Hovhannisyan M; Castel AD; Knowlton BJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1581-1601. PubMed ID: 28394160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Memory as assessed by recognition and reading time in normal and memory-impaired people with Alzheimer's disease and other neurological disorders.
    Moscovitch M; Winocur G; McLachlan D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1986 Dec; 115(4):331-47. PubMed ID: 2949044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reading aloud in clear speech reduces sentence recognition memory and recall for native and non-native talkers.
    Keerstock S; Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3387. PubMed ID: 34852619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.
    Meltzer JA; Rose NS; Deschamps T; Leigh RC; Panamsky L; Silberberg A; Madani N; Links KA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 26374330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: evidence from eye fixations and naming times.
    Altarriba J; Kroll JF; Sholl A; Rayner K
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Jul; 24(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 8757496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Remembering words not presented in sentences: how study context changes patterns of false memories.
    Matzen LE; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 19103975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readers scrutinize lexical familiarity only in the absence of expectations: Evidence from lexicality effects on event-related potentials.
    Caliskan N; Milligan S; Schotter ER
    Brain Lang; 2023 Mar; 238():105232. PubMed ID: 36803853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modality effects in sentence recall.
    Goolkasian P; Foos PW; Eaton M
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Apr; 136(2):205-23. PubMed ID: 19350835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences.
    Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23785182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of contextual constraints on recall for words within sentences.
    McFalls EL; Schwanenflugel PJ
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(1):67-88. PubMed ID: 11868195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction at the intersection of sentence context and word form: Evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading.
    Amenta S; Hasenäcker J; Crepaldi D; Marelli M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Jun; 30(3):1081-1092. PubMed ID: 36510092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanisms of word concreteness effects in explicit memory: Does context availability play a role?
    Taylor RS; Francis WS; Borunda-Vazquez L; Carbajal J
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):169-181. PubMed ID: 30182327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.