119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37459941)
21. Retinoscopy/autorefraction: which is the best starting point for a noncycloplegic refraction?
Jorge J; Queirós A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15630406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparisons of the handheld autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor, and subjective refraction in Singapore adults.
Farook M; Venkatramani J; Gazzard G; Cheng A; Tan D; Saw SM
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 82(12):1066-70. PubMed ID: 16357649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the new self-contained darkroom refractive screener versus table-top autorefractor and cycloplegia retinoscopy in detecting refractive error.
Wei X; Li L; Jiang L; Lu H; Huang H; Zhong D; Pan L; Wei D; Han Y; Lin H; Chen Q
BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):487. PubMed ID: 38012552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of the VISX wavescan and OPD-scan III with the subjective refraction.
Zhu R; Long KL; Wu XM; Li QD
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2016 Jul; 20(14):2988-92. PubMed ID: 27460724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accuracy and precision of automated subjective refraction in young hyperopes under cycloplegia.
Carracedo G; Carpena-Torres C; Pastrana C; Rodríguez-Lafora M; Serramito M; Privado-Aroco A; Espinosa-Vidal TM
J Optom; 2023; 16(4):252-260. PubMed ID: 37019707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of Noncycloplegic Refraction for Detecting Refractive Errors in School-aged African Children.
Ilechie AA; Addo NA; Abraham CH; Owusu-Ansah A; Annan-Prah A
Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Aug; 98(8):920-928. PubMed ID: 34460453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Repeatability of internal aberrometry with a new simultaneous capture aberrometer/corneal topographer.
Gifford P; Swarbrick HA
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jun; 89(6):929-38. PubMed ID: 22543999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical Evaluation Of a 0.05 D-step Binocular Wavefront Optometer in Young Adults in China.
Cheng M; Chen X; Lei Y; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Zhou X; Wang X
Clin Exp Optom; 2024 May; 107(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 36794379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of higher order aberrations measured by NIDEK OPD-Scan dynamic skiascopy and Zeiss WASCA Hartmann-Shack aberrometers.
Cerviño A; Hosking SL; Montés-Micó R
J Refract Surg; 2008 Oct; 24(8):790-6. PubMed ID: 18856232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Objective and subjective preoperative refraction techniques for wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Perez-Straziota CE; Randleman JB; Stulting RD
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):256-9. PubMed ID: 19185239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the VISX wavescan and NIDEK OPD-scan aberrometers.
Kim DS; Narváez J; Krassin J; Bahjri K
J Refract Surg; 2009 May; 25(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19507795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of the SVOne Handheld Autorefractor in a Pediatric Population.
Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 27668640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Difference of refraction values between standard autorefractometry and Plusoptix.
Bogdănici CM; Săndulache CM; Vasiliu R; Obadă O
Rom J Ophthalmol; 2016; 60(4):249-254. PubMed ID: 29450357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Agreement Between Swept-Source Optical Biometry and Scheimpflug-based Topography Measurements of Anterior Segment Parameters.
Özyol P; Özyol E
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 169():73-78. PubMed ID: 27320057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A randomized clinical trial using cyclopentolate and tropicamide to compare cycloplegic refraction in Chinese young adults with dark irises.
Pei R; Liu Z; Rong H; Zhao L; Du B; Jin N; Zhang H; Wang B; Pang Y; Wei R
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Jun; 21(1):256. PubMed ID: 34112149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions.
Tabernero J; Otero C; Pardhan S
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 9(7):23. PubMed ID: 32832229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of open-field autorefraction, closed-field autorefraction, and retinoscopy for refractive measurements of children and adolescents in Taiwan.
Kuo YC; Wang JH; Chiu CJ
J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Aug; 119(8):1251-1258. PubMed ID: 32354691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the refractive measurements with hand-held autorefractometer, table-mounted autorefractometer and cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.
Akil H; Keskin S; Çavdarli C
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 26028946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Is the Sphere Value Measured by an Autorefractor Reliable in Children under Cycloplegia? Comparison with Streak Retinoscopy.
Da Gama RD; Nom TY; Da Costa DC; Dos Santos JC; Da Costa RS; Relha C
Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano; 2013; 28(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 24372417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Agreement of wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction with subjective refraction.
Bamdad S; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Abdolahian M; Piñero DP
J Optom; 2022; 15(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 32896507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
