These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37459941)

  • 41. Agreement and Repeatability of Noncycloplegic and Cycloplegic Wavefront-based Autorefraction in Children.
    Rauscher FG; Lange H; Yahiaoui-Doktor M; Tegetmeyer H; Sterker I; Hinz A; Wahl S; Wiedemann P; Ohlendorf A; Blendowske R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Nov; 96(11):879-889. PubMed ID: 31703049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Accuracy of wavefront aberrometer refraction vs manifest refraction in cataract patients: impact of age, ametropia and visual function.
    Huelle JO; Katz T; Draeger J; Pahlitzsch M; Druchkiv V; Steinberg J; Richard G; Linke SJ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Apr; 251(4):1163-73. PubMed ID: 23292274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A novel Hartman Shack-based topography system: repeatability and agreement for corneal power with Scheimpflug+Placido topographer and rotating prism auto-keratorefractor.
    Prakash G; Srivastava D; Choudhuri S
    Int Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 35(6):869-80. PubMed ID: 25820517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Precision (Repeatability and Reproducibility) and Agreement of Corneal Power Measurements Obtained by Topcon KR-1W and iTrace.
    Hua Y; Xu Z; Qiu W; Wu Q
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147086. PubMed ID: 26752059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
    Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Overestimation of hyperopia with autorefraction compared with retinoscopy under cycloplegia in school-age children.
    Hashemi H; Khabazkhoob M; Asharlous A; Yekta A; Emamian MH; Fotouhi A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 102(12):1717-1722. PubMed ID: 29439996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of the Adaptive Optics Vision Analyzer and the KR-1 W for measuring ocular wave aberrations.
    Otero C; Vilaseca M; Arjona M; Martínez-Roda JA; Pujol J
    Clin Exp Optom; 2017 Jan; 100(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 27432594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effectiveness of an autorefractor with eye-tracking capability in pediatric patients.
    Kirschen D; Isenberg SJ
    J AAPOS; 2014 Jun; 18(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 24924271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of the results of four different refraction measurement devices in children with retinoscopy.
    Simsek M; Oral Y; Erogul O; Sabaner MC; Simsek C; Yorukoglu S
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2022; 66(4):337-343. PubMed ID: 36589324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Repeatability of ARK-30 in a pediatric population.
    Hernandez-Moreno L; Vallelado-Alvarez A; Martin R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 66(9):1262-1267. PubMed ID: 30127136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. COMPARISON OF SMARTPHONE-BASED AND AUTOMATED REFRACTION WITH SUBJECTIVE REFRACTION FOR SCREENING OF REFRACTIVE ERRORS.
    Ee CL; Samsudin A
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2022 Oct; 29(5):588-594. PubMed ID: 34620023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Accuracy of noncycloplegic autorefraction in school-age children in China.
    Zhao J; Mao J; Luo R; Li F; Pokharel GP; Ellwein LB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jan; 81(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 14747761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of the Near Eye Tool for Refractive Assessment (NETRA) and non-cycloplegic subjective refraction.
    Hasrod N; Rubin A
    BMJ Open Ophthalmol; 2022; 7(1):e000851. PubMed ID: 35452206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of the handheld Retinomax K-Plus2 and on-table autokeratometers in children with and without cycloplegia.
    Liang CL; Hung KS; Park N; Chan P; Juo SH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):669-74. PubMed ID: 15050266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Test-Retest of the Spot Vision Screener among Children with Ophthalmological Diseases including Strabismus.
    Ichimura M; Ueki S; Fukuchi T
    J Ophthalmol; 2024; 2024():2173860. PubMed ID: 38741691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Durr NJ; Dave SR; Vera-Diaz FA; Lim D; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S; Thorn F; Lage E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1140-7. PubMed ID: 26580271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Accuracy evaluation of objective refraction using the wavefront aberrometer in pseudophakic eyes.
    Hou M; Ding Y; Liu L; Xu Y; Li J; Wu M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 258(10):2213-2221. PubMed ID: 32577855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements.
    Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical evaluation of the Topcon BV-1000 automated subjective refraction system.
    Dave T; Fukuma Y
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 15181357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.