These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

55 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37460126)

  • 21. Assessing the dependence of sensitivity and specificity on prevalence in meta-analysis.
    Li J; Fine JP
    Biostatistics; 2011 Oct; 12(4):710-22. PubMed ID: 21525421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Random measurement error and regression dilution bias.
    Hutcheon JA; Chiolero A; Hanley JA
    BMJ; 2010 Jun; 340():c2289. PubMed ID: 20573762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection.
    Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR; Poole C
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2384-99. PubMed ID: 19499551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis.
    Leeflang MM; Bossuyt PM; Irwig L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 18778913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach.
    Chu H; Cole SR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1331-2; author reply 1332-3. PubMed ID: 17098577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
    Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation.
    Mulherin SA; Miller WC
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Oct; 137(7):598-602. PubMed ID: 12353947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence.
    Brenner H; Gefeller O
    Stat Med; 1997 May; 16(9):981-91. PubMed ID: 9160493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests.
    Ransohoff DF; Feinstein AR
    N Engl J Med; 1978 Oct; 299(17):926-30. PubMed ID: 692598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Murad MH; Lin L; Chu H; Hasan B; Alsibai RA; Abbas AS; Mustafa RA; Wang Z
    CMAJ; 2023 Jul; 195(27):E925-E931. PubMed ID: 37460126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Dinnes J; Deeks J; Kirby J; Roderick P
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(12):1-113, iii. PubMed ID: 15774235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diagnostic tests for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in preschool children.
    Randall M; Egberts KJ; Samtani A; Scholten RJ; Hooft L; Livingstone N; Sterling-Levis K; Woolfenden S; Williams K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jul; 7(7):CD009044. PubMed ID: 30075057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Variation of a test's sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence.
    Leeflang MM; Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Hooft L; Bossuyt PM
    CMAJ; 2013 Aug; 185(11):E537-44. PubMed ID: 23798453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.
    Struyf T; Deeks JJ; Dinnes J; Takwoingi Y; Davenport C; Leeflang MM; Spijker R; Hooft L; Emperador D; Domen J; Tans A; Janssens S; Wickramasinghe D; Lannoy V; Horn SRA; Van den Bruel A;
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 May; 5(5):CD013665. PubMed ID: 35593186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The diagnostic accuracy of the GenoType(®) MTBDRsl assay for the detection of resistance to second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs.
    Theron G; Peter J; Richardson M; Barnard M; Donegan S; Warren R; Steingart KR; Dheda K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; (10):CD010705. PubMed ID: 25353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews.
    van Enst WA; Scholten RJ; Whiting P; Zwinderman AH; Hooft L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):1192-9. PubMed ID: 24996667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.