126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37460345)
1. Editorial comment: Impact of National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer guidelines on surgical margin status.
Wood EH; Shibata D
Surg Oncol; 2023 Dec; 51():101971. PubMed ID: 37460345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer guidelines on surgical margin status.
Arndt KR; Dombek GE; Allar BG; Storino A; Fleishman A; Quinn J; Fabrizio A; Cataldo TE; Messaris E
Surg Oncol; 2023 Dec; 51():101921. PubMed ID: 36898906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the Quality of Rectal Cancer Pathology Reports in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-04/NRG Oncology.
Sho S; Yothers G; Colangelo LH; Ganz PA; O'Connell MJ; Beart RW; Hemmelgarn M; Chen FC; Ko CY; Russell MM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Aug; 63(8):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 32692071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Rationale for and Reality of the New National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer.
Wexner SD; Berho ME
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Jun; 60(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 28481853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Could meeting the standards of the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer in the National Cancer Database improve patient outcomes?
Brady JT; Bingmer K; Bliggenstorfer J; Xu Z; Fleming FJ; Remzi FH; Monson JRT; Wexner SD; Dietz DW;
Colorectal Dis; 2023 May; 25(5):916-922. PubMed ID: 36727838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Update on The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC): the radiologist's role.
Korngold EK; Gollub MJ; Kim DH; Moreno CC; de Prisco G; Harisinghani M; Khatri G
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Sep; 48(9):2814-2824. PubMed ID: 37160474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the Current Status of Rectal Cancer Care in the US: Where We Stand at the Start of the Commission on Cancer's National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer.
Brady JT; Xu Z; Scarberry KB; Saad A; Fleming FJ; Remzi FH; Wexner SD; Winchester DP; Monson JRT; Lee L; Dietz DW;
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 May; 226(5):881-890. PubMed ID: 29580675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving Rectal Cancer Outcomes with the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer.
Wexner SD; White CM
Clin Colon Rectal Surg; 2020 Sep; 33(5):318-324. PubMed ID: 32968367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of Patterns of Compliance with Accreditation Standards of National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer.
Raman S; Tsoraides SS; Sylla P; Sarin A; Farkas L; DeKoster E; Hull T; Wexner S
J Am Coll Surg; 2022 Mar; 234(3):368-376. PubMed ID: 35213501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Access to Hospitals Most Ready to Achieve National Accreditation for Rectal Cancer Treatment.
Antunez AG; Kanters AE; Regenbogen SE
JAMA Surg; 2019 Jun; 154(6):516-523. PubMed ID: 30785616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experience of a single academic institution with the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer and the resulting improvement in care.
Johns AJ; Yoon PS; Sabo AJ; Huynh TT; Farmer DL; Navarro SM; Farkas LM
Colorectal Dis; 2023 Nov; 25(11):2155-2159. PubMed ID: 37789561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer: A Current Audit of the National Cancer Database.
Simon HL; de Paula TR; Profeta da Luz MM; Kiran RP; Keller DS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Sep; 64(9):1096-1105. PubMed ID: 33951688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer: A Long and Winding Road.
Orangio GR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Feb; 61(2):145-146. PubMed ID: 29337764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Specialization improves outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.
Wolford D; Westcott L; Fleshman J
Surg Oncol; 2022 Aug; 43():101740. PubMed ID: 35292183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer Accreditation Improve Outcomes for Patients with Rectal Cancer?
Hull TL
J Am Coll Surg; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38483044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of positive radial margin status in a population-based cohort of patients with rectal cancer.
Phang PT; Kennecke H; McGahan CE; Macfarlane J; McGregor G; Hay JH
Curr Oncol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 18454185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High Rate of Positive Circumferential Resection Margins Following Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Call to Action.
Rickles AS; Dietz DW; Chang GJ; Wexner SD; Berho ME; Remzi FH; Greene FL; Fleshman JW; Abbas MA; Peters W; Noyes K; Monson JR; Fleming FJ;
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):891-8. PubMed ID: 26473651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comment on: Does accreditation matter? An analysis of complications of bariatric cases using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program and National Quality Improvement Program databases.
Morton J
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2022 Jun; 18(6):e37-e38. PubMed ID: 35491315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Circumferential Resection Margin Status as a Predictive Factor for Recurrence in Preoperative MRI for Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer Without Preoperative Therapy.
Mazaki J; Tsukamoto S; Miyake M; Moritani K; Sakamoto R; Shida D; Kanemitsu Y
Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Jan; 64(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 33306533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients.
Hopkins MB; Geiger TM; Bethurum AJ; Ford MM; Muldoon RL; Beck DE; Stewart TG; Hawkins AT
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2613-2622. PubMed ID: 31346754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
