166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37460964)
1. Dimensionality of genomic information and its impact on genome-wide associations and variant selection for genomic prediction: a simulation study.
Jang S; Tsuruta S; Leite NG; Misztal I; Lourenco D
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jul; 55(1):49. PubMed ID: 37460964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incorporation of causative quantitative trait nucleotides in single-step GBLUP.
Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Legarra A; Misztal I
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jul; 49(1):59. PubMed ID: 28747171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic prediction based on selective linkage disequilibrium pruning of low-coverage whole-genome sequence variants in a pure Duroc population.
Zhu D; Zhao Y; Zhang R; Wu H; Cai G; Wu Z; Wang Y; Hu X
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Oct; 55(1):72. PubMed ID: 37853325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Weighted single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction integrating variants selected from sequencing data by association and bioinformatics analyses.
Liu A; Lund MS; Boichard D; Karaman E; Guldbrandtsen B; Fritz S; Aamand GP; Nielsen US; Sahana G; Wang Y; Su G
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Aug; 52(1):48. PubMed ID: 32799816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implications of SNP weighting on single-step genomic predictions for different reference population sizes.
Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Bradford HL; Menezes IR; Ferraz JBS; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Misztal I
J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Dec; 134(6):463-471. PubMed ID: 28833593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic prediction based on selected variants from imputed whole-genome sequence data in Australian sheep populations.
Moghaddar N; Khansefid M; van der Werf JHJ; Bolormaa S; Duijvesteijn N; Clark SA; Swan AA; Daetwyler HD; MacLeod IM
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Dec; 51(1):72. PubMed ID: 31805849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Dimensionality of Genomic Information and Its Effect on Genomic Prediction.
Pocrnic I; Lourenco DA; Masuda Y; Legarra A; Misztal I
Genetics; 2016 May; 203(1):573-81. PubMed ID: 26944916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic prediction in a numerically small breed population using prioritized genetic markers from whole-genome sequence data.
Moghaddar N; Brown DJ; Swan AA; Gurman PM; Li L; van der Werf JH
J Anim Breed Genet; 2022 Jan; 139(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 34374454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genotype Imputation to Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Rabbits.
Mancin E; Sosa-Madrid BS; Blasco A; Ibáñez-Escriche N
Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33805619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functionally prioritised whole-genome sequence variants improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for heat tolerance.
Cheruiyot EK; Haile-Mariam M; Cocks BG; MacLeod IM; Mrode R; Pryce JE
Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Feb; 54(1):17. PubMed ID: 35183109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of alternative approaches to single-trait genomic prediction using genotyped and non-genotyped Hanwoo beef cattle.
Lee J; Cheng H; Garrick D; Golden B; Dekkers J; Park K; Lee D; Fernando R
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):2. PubMed ID: 28093065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genome-wide association study and prediction of genomic breeding values for fatty-acid composition in Korean Hanwoo cattle using a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism array.
Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Kim HJ; Lee DH; Lee SH; Yoon HB; Lee SH
J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4063-4075. PubMed ID: 30265318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic predictions in purebreds with a multibreed genomic relationship matrix1.
Steyn Y; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2019 Nov; 97(11):4418-4427. PubMed ID: 31539424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-step genomic prediction of fruit-quality traits using phenotypic records of non-genotyped relatives in citrus.
Imai A; Kuniga T; Yoshioka T; Nonaka K; Mitani N; Fukamachi H; Hiehata N; Yamamoto M; Hayashi T
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221880. PubMed ID: 31465502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genome-enabled prediction of meat and carcass traits using Bayesian regression, single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction and blending methods in Nelore cattle.
Lopes FB; Baldi F; Passafaro TL; Brunes LC; Costa MFO; Eifert EC; Narciso MG; Rosa GJM; Lobo RB; Magnabosco CU
Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100006. PubMed ID: 33516009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Whole-genome sequence-based genomic prediction in laying chickens with different genomic relationship matrices to account for genetic architecture.
Ni G; Cavero D; Fangmann A; Erbe M; Simianer H
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):8. PubMed ID: 28093063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Alternative SNP weighting for multi-step and single-step genomic BLUP in the presence of causative variants.
Santana BF; Riser M; Hay EHA; Fragomeni BO
J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Nov; 140(6):679-694. PubMed ID: 37551047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of linkage disequilibrium heterogeneity along the genome on genomic prediction and heritability estimation.
Ren D; Cai X; Lin Q; Ye H; Teng J; Li J; Ding X; Zhang Z
Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Jun; 54(1):47. PubMed ID: 35761182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
