These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37460964)

  • 41. Determining the stability of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values in future generations in commercial pig populations.
    Hollifield MK; Lourenco D; Bermann M; Howard JT; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Apr; 99(4):. PubMed ID: 33733277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Genomic prediction in contrast to a genome-wide association study in explaining heritable variation of complex growth traits in breeding populations of Eucalyptus.
    Müller BSF; Neves LG; de Almeida Filho JE; Resende MFR; Muñoz PR; Dos Santos PET; Filho EP; Kirst M; Grattapaglia D
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):524. PubMed ID: 28693539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Genomic Prediction Based on SNP Functional Annotation Using Imputed Whole-Genome Sequence Data in Korean Hanwoo Cattle.
    Lopez BIM; An N; Srikanth K; Lee S; Oh JD; Shin DH; Park W; Chai HH; Park JE; Lim D
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():603822. PubMed ID: 33552124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
    Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Genomic prediction using preselected DNA variants from a GWAS with whole-genome sequence data in Holstein-Friesian cattle.
    Veerkamp RF; Bouwman AC; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Dec; 48(1):95. PubMed ID: 27905878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Genomic predictions based on animal models using genotype imputation on a national scale in Norwegian Red cattle.
    Meuwissen TH; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Oct; 47():79. PubMed ID: 26464226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of high-density genotypic data and different methods on joint genomic prediction: A case study in large white pigs.
    Zhao W; Zhang Z; Ma P; Wang Z; Wang Q; Zhang Z; Pan Y
    Anim Genet; 2023 Feb; 54(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 36414135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparative analysis of the GBLUP, emBayesB, and GWAS algorithms to predict genetic values in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea).
    Dong L; Xiao S; Wang Q; Wang Z
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jun; 17():460. PubMed ID: 27301965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Use of gene expression and whole-genome sequence information to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for carcass traits in Hanwoo cattle.
    de Las Heras-Saldana S; Lopez BI; Moghaddar N; Park W; Park JE; Chung KY; Lim D; Lee SH; Shin D; van der Werf JHJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Sep; 52(1):54. PubMed ID: 32993481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Weighted genomic prediction for growth and carcass-related traits in Nelore cattle.
    da Silva Neto JB; Peripoli E; Pereira ASC; Stafuzza NB; Lôbo RB; Fukumasu H; Ferraz JBS; Baldi F
    Anim Genet; 2023 Jun; 54(3):271-283. PubMed ID: 36856051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Genomic breeding values, SNP effects and gene identification for disease traits in cow training sets.
    Naderi S; Bohlouli M; Yin T; König S
    Anim Genet; 2018 Jun; 49(3):178-192. PubMed ID: 29624705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Moghaddar N; Gore KP; Daetwyler HD; Hayes BJ; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():97. PubMed ID: 26694131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Weighted single-step genomic BLUP improves accuracy of genomic breeding values for protein content in French dairy goats: a quantitative trait influenced by a major gene.
    Teissier M; Larroque H; Robert-Granié C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jun; 50(1):31. PubMed ID: 29907084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
    Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Quantitative trait loci markers derived from whole genome sequence data increases the reliability of genomic prediction.
    Brøndum RF; Su G; Janss L; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Boichard D; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):4107-16. PubMed ID: 25892697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sharing of either phenotypes or genetic variants can increase the accuracy of genomic prediction of feed efficiency.
    Bolormaa S; MacLeod IM; Khansefid M; Marett LC; Wales WJ; Miglior F; Baes CF; Schenkel FS; Connor EE; Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Stothard P; Herman E; Nieuwhof GJ; Goddard ME; Pryce JE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Sep; 54(1):60. PubMed ID: 36068488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accounting for Population Structure and Phenotypes From Relatives in Association Mapping for Farm Animals: A Simulation Study.
    Mancin E; Lourenco D; Bermann M; Mantovani R; Misztal I
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():642065. PubMed ID: 33995481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Relevance of genetic relationship in GWAS and genomic prediction.
    Pereira HD; Soriano Viana JM; Andrade ACB; Fonseca E Silva F; Paes GP
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Feb; 59(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29190011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.